US Politics

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Trump is devoid of empathy.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Nephew of Donald Trump calls him Donald instead of uncle.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

His own VP has come out against him.

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Kamala Harris is actively considering her political future following her recent defeat in the 2024 presidential election. Reports indicate that she has instructed her advisers to keep her options open for a potential run in 2028 or possibly for the governorship of California in 2026.

Key Details:​

• Current Status: After a challenging campaign, Harris has been taking time to unwind with family and close aides in Hawaii. Despite the setback, she remains determined, telling her inner circle, "I am staying in the fight."
• Potential Runs: Harris is contemplating two main paths:
  • 2028 Presidential Run: She has not ruled out another bid for the presidency, and recent polling shows her leading among potential Democratic candidates with 41% support.
  • 2026 Gubernatorial Run: With California Governor Gavin Newsom term-limited, Harris is considering running for his position. However, insiders suggest that pursuing both a gubernatorial and presidential campaign simultaneously could be challenging due to timing and campaign demands.
• Political Strategy: Harris's allies emphasize the importance of maintaining visibility and political relationships as she navigates her next steps. They suggest she might establish an independent entity to continue engaging with voters and stakeholders while deliberating on her future.
• Public Perception: While some Democratic strategists express mixed feelings about her potential candidacy, others believe that Harris still holds significant political capital within the party. Her ability to mobilize support and navigate complex political landscapes will be crucial as she decides on her next moves.
• Future Considerations: Harris's decisions over the coming months will be closely watched, particularly as she balances her role as Vice President with her aspirations for future office. Discussions with family and advisers during the winter holiday season are expected to shape her strategy moving forward.

Harris's political journey continues to evolve, and her next steps could significantly impact the Democratic Party's landscape leading into the next election cycle.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has publicly criticized the U.S. involvement in the Ukraine conflict, labeling it a "proxy war" with Russia and describing it as detrimental to the Ukrainian people. During a recent town hall event, he stated that the U.S. has turned Ukraine into a pawn in its geopolitical struggles, which has led to missed opportunities for a peaceful resolution.

Key Points from Kennedy's Remarks:​

• Proxy War: Kennedy emphasized that the conflict represents a proxy war where the U.S. is using Ukraine to further its own interests against Russia, rather than genuinely supporting the Ukrainian people.
• Humanitarian Concerns: He expressed that the way the U.S. has conducted its involvement in the war has been "terrible for the Ukrainian people," criticizing the lack of efforts to settle the conflict peacefully.
• Historical Context: Kennedy attributed the current situation to decades of U.S. and NATO policies towards Ukraine and Russia, suggesting that these policies have created conditions leading to the ongoing war.
• Security Concerns: He acknowledged Russia's legitimate security concerns regarding NATO's expansion and suggested that understanding these concerns is crucial for any potential negotiations.
• Call for Truth: Kennedy stressed the importance of restoring America's moral authority globally, even if his views are unpopular among many Democrats who support President Biden's approach to Ukraine.

Conclusion​

Kennedy's statements reflect a critical stance on U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine, advocating for a reassessment of America's role and motivations in the conflict. His perspective highlights broader debates within U.S. political discourse about military involvement and diplomatic strategies in international conflicts.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1862002443158180233

 

[AbdulQadir7]

During a recent discussion, President-elect Donald Trump reportedly suggested to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that Canada could become the 51st state of the United States if new tariffs he plans to impose severely cripple its economy. Trump humorously mentioned that Trudeau could serve as the governor in this hypothetical scenario. This remark came in the context of Trump's announcement of a proposed 25% tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico, which he intends to implement on his first day in office, unless these countries take significant action to curb drug trafficking and illegal immigration across their borders.

Key Points:

• Tariff Threat: Trump has indicated that the tariffs would remain in effect until Canada and Mexico address issues related to drug trafficking and migration. This could potentially lead to significant economic repercussions for Canada, which is heavily reliant on trade with the U.S.
• Trudeau's Response: Trudeau has emphasized that the Canadian border is fundamentally different from the U.S.-Mexico border regarding drug trafficking and migration issues. Canadian officials are preparing for possible retaliatory measures if Trump's tariffs are enacted.
• Political Context: The conversation reflects ongoing tensions in U.S.-Canada relations, particularly concerning trade and border security. Trump's comments may have been intended as a light-hearted jab, but they underscore serious concerns about the potential economic impact of his proposed tariffs on Canada.

This situation highlights the complexities of international relations and trade dynamics between neighboring countries, particularly under a leadership that employs aggressive tariff strategies as a negotiating tool.

 

[Akbar26]

Joe Biden recently became the first U.S. president to visit Angola, signaling the importance of the country in America's strategic efforts to counter China's influence in Africa. The visit highlighted the development of the Lobito Corridor, a major infrastructure project aimed at connecting Angola's Lobito port to Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) via rail and road networks. This initiative seeks to improve access to Africa's mineral-rich regions and reduce reliance on China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects, which have long dominated African infrastructure development.
The Lobito Corridor is part of the U.S.-led Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGI), which aims to promote transparent and sustainable development as an alternative to China's often opaque financing methods. This project, backed by U.S., EU, and African Development Bank funding, intends to modernize 1,344 kilometers of rail, build additional links in Zambia, and facilitate cobalt and copper exports from the region to global markets. The Corridor is seen as a centerpiece in the U.S. effort to showcase its investment in Africa beyond traditional aid, offering a competitive alternative to China's established projects like the TAZARA railway

President Biden's visit also underscored Angola's geopolitical importance. The country has balanced relationships with global powers, including China, the U.S., and Russia. Angola's significant debt to China—primarily tied to infrastructure loans—complicates this balancing act. While the U.S. hopes to deepen economic and possibly military ties with Angola, the nation's strategic location and resource wealth make it a key player in the competition between major powers

Biden's visit aligns with his administration's broader Africa strategy, which aims to enhance U.S.-Africa relations, particularly in infrastructure, critical minerals, and clean energy sectors, while countering China's economic dominance

https://twitter.com/x/status/1864060530349982191

 

[sidkhan2]

In an interview with Tucker Carlson, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused the Biden administration of attempting to leave a deliberately challenging legacy for the incoming Trump administration.Key points from Lavrov's statements:

1. Biden's Administration's Intent

• Lavrov claims the Biden team wants "to leave a legacy to the Trump administration as bad as they can"
• He compared this approach to what Barack Obama did to Trump during his first term

1. Historical Context

• Lavrov recalled Obama's actions in late December 2016, which included:
  • Expelling 120 Russian diplomats and their families
  • Forcing diplomats to travel from Washington to Moscow without direct flights
  • Seizing Russian diplomatic property without allowing Russia to inspect the property

1. Assessment of Trump

• Lavrov described Trump as "a very strong person" who "wants results"
• He emphasized that Trump being "friendly in discussions" does not mean he is pro-Russian
• Noted that the Trump administration imposed significant sanctions on Russia

1. Future Diplomacy

• Lavrov stated Russia will judge the Trump administration "by specific steps"
• He indicated Russia respects the American electoral process and is open to future contacts

Lavrov's comments suggest a complex diplomatic narrative surrounding the transition between the Biden and Trump administrations.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1864828673683059080

 

[Akbar26]

Following the recent pardon of Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden is reportedly considering preemptive pardons for several individuals who may face scrutiny under the incoming Trump administration. Among those mentioned is General Mark Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who has been a target of criticism for his actions during Donald Trump's presidency.

Key Developments:​

1. Pardon Considerations: Biden's team is discussing potential pardons for individuals viewed as adversaries by Trump. This includes not only Milley but also prominent figures like former GOP Representative Liz Cheney, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Senator-elect Adam Schiff. The discussions are driven by concerns over Trump's promises of "retribution" against perceived political enemies once he assumes office.
2. Milley's Controversial Calls: General Milley faced backlash for reportedly assuring Chinese officials during the Trump administration that he would inform them of any impending U.S. military actions. Trump has labeled these actions as "treason," and there are fears that Milley could be prosecuted under a future Trump administration.
3. Biden's Recent Pardon: The consideration for pardons follows Biden's recent decision to grant a full pardon to his son, Hunter Biden, which has sparked significant political backlash. The White House justified this move by stating it was necessary to prevent ongoing political attacks against Hunter.
4. Strategic Shielding: The potential pardons are seen as a strategy to protect key figures from legal repercussions that could arise from Trump's anticipated aggressive approach to governance. This includes shielding individuals who have been involved in investigations related to Trump's actions, particularly those connected to the January 6 Capitol riot.
5. Political Ramifications: The discussions around pardons reflect broader concerns within the Democratic Party about the implications of a Trump presidency. Lawmakers and aides are urging Biden to take proactive measures to safeguard officials who acted in what they believe was the best interest of the country during turbulent times.

Conclusion:​

Biden's consideration of preemptive pardons highlights the ongoing tensions between his administration and Trump's expected return to power. As political dynamics shift, these discussions may shape the future landscape of U.S. governance and accountability, particularly regarding how past officials are treated under a potentially hostile administration.

 

[HaiderAfan]

In the weeks leading up to Donald Trump's anticipated return to the presidency, the Biden administration has initiated the auctioning of unused materials originally intended for the construction of the U.S.-Mexico border wall. This move has sparked significant political controversy and criticism.

Key Details​

1. Auction of Border Wall Materials: The Biden administration is selling off materials, including steel tubing and other components, that were procured during Trump's push for border security. These auctions have been conducted through GovPlanet, an online marketplace for surplus government materials, with some items reportedly starting at bids as low as $5.
2. Political Backlash: Republican lawmakers have expressed outrage over the auctions, framing them as a "waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars." Critics argue that instead of selling off these materials, they should be utilized to enhance border security amid rising illegal crossings. Senator Tim Scott and House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer have been vocal in their condemnation, suggesting that these actions undermine national security.
3. Biden's Justification: The Biden administration has defended the decision to auction off the materials by stating that funds appropriated in 2019 must be utilized by the end of the fiscal year. They argue that this process is in accordance with federal acquisition regulations for disposing of excess property.
4. Timing of Auctions: The timing of these auctions has raised suspicions among Republicans, who suggest that it may be an attempt to complicate Trump's plans to resume border wall construction upon taking office again in January 2025. The administration's decision to approve a new stretch of border wall construction in Texas shortly after initiating these auctions has further fueled this narrative.
5. Public Reaction: The auctions have led to polarized opinions on social media, with some viewing them as a strategic move to hinder Trump’s policy initiatives while others see it as a pragmatic approach to managing government assets.
6. Ongoing Border Issues: The backdrop of these actions includes ongoing challenges at the southern border, where illegal crossings have surged. Republican lawmakers argue that halting wall construction has contributed to this crisis, while the Biden administration maintains that comprehensive immigration reform is necessary.

Conclusion​

The Biden administration's decision to auction off unused border wall materials has ignited a political firestorm as Trump prepares for his return to office. As both parties navigate this contentious issue, it underscores the ongoing debate over immigration policy and border security in the United States. The implications of these actions will likely continue to resonate in political discourse as Trump re-establishes his agenda on immigration and border control.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1867274859581256139

 

[RClarkTaylor]

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinkenexpressed strong support for the establishment of a new government in Syria, emphasizing that it represents a significant opportunity for the Syrian people. He stated, “For the first time in decades, Syria has an opportunity to have a government that is run by and answers to the people, not dominated by a dictator, religious or ethnic group, or outside power.”

Key Points from Blinken's Remarks​

1. Inclusive Transition: Blinken highlighted the need for an inclusive political transition in Syria that would lead to a government accountable to its citizens. This reflects a shift in U.S. policy following the recent overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad.
2. Support for Syrian Aspirations: The Secretary of State reiterated the U.S. commitment to working closely with international partners to help Syrians realize their aspirations for a representative government.
3. Regional Stability Concerns: Blinken's comments also addressed concerns about Syria becoming a base for terrorism and posed threats to neighboring countries. He underscored the importance of ensuring that any new government renounces support for extremist groups.
4. Context of His Visit: Blinken made these remarks during his visit to Jordan, where he met with King Abdullah II to discuss the implications of Assad's ouster and the future of Syria. This visit is part of a broader diplomatic effort to stabilize the region following significant political changes in Syria.
5. International Recognition: The U.S. has indicated that it would recognize and support a new Syrian government if it emerges from an inclusive process that respects minority rights and promotes stability.
6. Challenges Ahead: Despite these optimistic statements, significant challenges remain in establishing a stable and representative government in Syria, particularly given the complex dynamics involving various factions and external influences in the region.

Conclusion​

Blinken's support for a new Syrian government reflects a pivotal moment in U.S. foreign policy towards Syria, emphasizing democratic aspirations and regional security. As the situation evolves, the U.S. administration aims to navigate the complexities of rebuilding governance in Syria while addressing humanitarian needs and countering extremism in the region.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1867313392999936278

 

[AbdulQadir7]

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinkenexpressed strong support for the establishment of a new government in Syria, emphasizing that it represents a significant opportunity for the Syrian people. He stated, “For the first time in decades, Syria has an opportunity to have a government that is run by and answers to the people, not dominated by a dictator, religious or ethnic group, or outside power.”

Key Points from Blinken's Remarks​

1. Inclusive Transition: Blinken highlighted the need for an inclusive political transition in Syria that would lead to a government accountable to its citizens. This reflects a shift in U.S. policy following the recent overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad.
2. Support for Syrian Aspirations: The Secretary of State reiterated the U.S. commitment to working closely with international partners to help Syrians realize their aspirations for a representative government.
3. Regional Stability Concerns: Blinken's comments also addressed concerns about Syria becoming a base for terrorism and posed threats to neighboring countries. He underscored the importance of ensuring that any new government renounces support for extremist groups.
4. Context of His Visit: Blinken made these remarks during his visit to Jordan, where he met with King Abdullah II to discuss the implications of Assad's ouster and the future of Syria. This visit is part of a broader diplomatic effort to stabilize the region following significant political changes in Syria.
5. International Recognition: The U.S. has indicated that it would recognize and support a new Syrian government if it emerges from an inclusive process that respects minority rights and promotes stability.
6. Challenges Ahead: Despite these optimistic statements, significant challenges remain in establishing a stable and representative government in Syria, particularly given the complex dynamics involving various factions and external influences in the region.

Conclusion​

Blinken's support for a new Syrian government reflects a pivotal moment in U.S. foreign policy towards Syria, emphasizing democratic aspirations and regional security. As the situation evolves, the U.S. administration aims to navigate the complexities of rebuilding governance in Syria while addressing humanitarian needs and countering extremism in the region.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1867313392999936278

https://twitter.com/x/status/1867309022799598002