Sharma Ji
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2020
- Messages
- 2,486
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
how has it failed here ?India
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
how has it failed here ?India
After 70 years of democracy, the country is still the most hungry nation on this planet, I wouldn't term it as a success.how has it failed here ?
We're a lot better off than 70 years ago.After 70 years of democracy, the country is still the most hungry nation on this planet, I wouldn't term it as a success.
The human race is better off than 70 years ago, this is for sure, but India is still the hungriest people on this planet ranking next to bottom on almost all human development index lists, please call it a success.We're a lot better off than 70 years ago.
Indian democracy has not failed.
It's not for the military industrial complex to allow occupy or commies or Islamists or anyone else to attain governorship.
They have a handful of "democratic socialists" in congress
Then Indians are tired of Congress, overthrown them and get BJP in charge. BJP is kind of strong ideological, Hindutva religion nationalism. Kind of dangerous and Nazi type.
You can keep trolling all you want but democracy is the system we chose and it has served us well and works for us so far.The human race is better off than 70 years ago, this is for sure, but India is still the hungriest people on this planet ranking next to bottom on almost all human development index lists, please call it a success.
Which part of my comment is not right?You can keep trolling all you want
We're a lot better off than 70 years ago.
Indian democracy has not failed.
The fact remains that the military-industrial complex wants to perpetually keep earning the monies by retaining those governments who wage imperialist wars around the world.
Tell me, how different is the Democrats party from the Republicans ? Obomba won for the Democrats, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for some strange reason and then in 2011 began war against Libya and Syria. The Bush family of the Republicans did the same against Iraq.
The rest of the American bureaucratic system keeps the American public pacified through basketball games, muscle cars, barbaric "games" like WWE and boxing, silly Hollywood action films like Fast and Furious, propaganda films like Rambo and The Dictator, and a general sense that USA is superior.
There are so many homeless people in USA yet the government maintains a hugely expensive military to invade Libya where housing was the basic human right of every person. Doesn't that sound ridiculous ? And who is imminently threatening to invade USA ?
In the current American context, senator Sanders, congresswoman AOC and squad etc.. this: https://www.dsausa.org/I don't understand what "democratic socialists" means ? Tell me what it is in theory and in practice ?
I live here.Which part of my comment is not right?
Where did I say anything of the sort ?I am reminded of something some Indian ultra-nationalists used to say : "America got electricity for its people in a few hundred years but India got electricity in decades". Is this logical ?
No, we're a democracy. BJP fascism fears are overblown and not reality but that is to be expected from the left and other opposition such as Islamists.In practice India is a demagogy.
Totally disagree.The underlying assumption is that the masses can never be at a base level of intellectual capacity where they can make good governance decisions. I don’t agree with that, it is true that countries with poor education levels dont understand democracy and waste it, but the US is at a level where it’s not that big an issue.
Mass must decide the fate of the nation otherwise it'd be a form of dictatorship. & what you mean it is one man one vote? what is the alternative?Western democracy is not democracy at all. It's just one man one vote. It doomed to fail. When Mass decide the fate of the nation, the nation is finished.
The primary flaw of the model is the elective process... a clown circus where right things must be said to the right crowd and whoever takes one more vote takes it all... is it really representative much less merit based? Can the right guy win if he cannot please the crowds? And delivery is much further away...Western democracy is not democracy at all. It's just one man one vote. It doomed to fail. When Mass decide the fate of the nation, the nation is finished.
Real democracy is not about the procedure, but the substance.
The western model nowadays is Delegate Model of Representation. It cannot be functional properly.
The Chinese model is Trustee Model of Representation.
This is the difference. If anyone interested, please refer to Edmund Burke (1723–1792) .