What's new

US plans to gut aid to India but continue with $200 mn to Pakistan

Why would an American taxpayer whose dollars are used to give Aid not be concerned about someone who seems to be asking for our aid? lol
Being an American taxpayer won't change your origin, which is Indian. Never forget that
 
.
Neither India nor china have asked for aid , hell India itself gives aid to other countries , 27% of Bhutanese GDP I'd from indian aid money . US aid programs are used to increase their influence for geopolitic & economic ties
 
.
LOL gibberish? I asked you about American aid and you made it into a Modi rant?

I don't care if Modi did or did not do this or that.

I'm simply asking you based on your objections. Are you of a political belief that you guys would bring handouts back? As an American taxpayer, I'd like to know.

Feel free to keep bashing and maligning India, but please answer my simple question. and Oh...google can't translate your last line. Keep it in English if you like my opinion or prefer to have me read it. Thanks.


What has an impersonating American got to do with my political affiliation?

You have issues.
See a pakistani doctor.
The world bank etc give loans , not aid.

Err!

r45t6y.png


Current affairs defunct dude.
 
. .
So you want my taxpayer money as a handout but can't bring yourself, to be honest. Got it.

And what does the following gem of your in the following imply:

I would take it as a sign of significant progress for not needing aid during non-critical times

You have clearly made up your mind on India not needing an aid in the above sentence.
So why now 180 deg turn with the following:

So you want my taxpayer money as a handout but can't bring yourself

Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)?
Its Ritalin time for you!
Go to bed kid.

You are on my five star ignore list now!
 
.
What has an impersonating American got to do with my political affiliation?



Err!

View attachment 395139

Current affairs defunct dude.
A good definition, but how is it connected to present India ?
"
China on Monday offered $43 billion to the IMF's crisis-fighting reserves, rounding off a global push to nearly double the Fund's war chest to $456 billion to help protect countries from fallout from the euro zone debt crisis.

China's contribution was part of a pledge by Group of 20 countries made in April to supply the International Monetary Fund with extra firepower.

"These resources are being made available for crisis prevention and resolution and to meet the potential financing needs of all IMF members," said IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde.

"They will be drawn only if they are needed as a second line of defense" when other IMF loans have been depleted, she said in a statement during a Group of 20 summit in Mexico.

The leaders of BRICS nations -- Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa -- said earlier that they "agreed to enhance their own contributions to the IMF" but had insisted that the money be used only after existing funds were depleted.

According to a chart published by the IMF, Brazil, Russia and India each pledged $10 billion, while South Africa offered $2 billion. G20 host Mexico also contributed $10 billion."

Does not match the alternate reality in which you stay " ashok".
 
.
And what does the following gem of your in the following imply:

I would take it as a sign of significant progress for not needing aid during non-critical times

You have clearly made up your mind on India not needing an aid in the above sentence.
So why now 180 deg turn with the following:

So you want my taxpayer money as a handout but can't bring yourself

Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)?
Its Ritalin time for you!
Go to bed kid.

You are on my five star ignore list now!

You seem to have trouble distinguishing the two comments

The first comment I'm confirming India's rise and not needing AID today

The second comment I'm questioning you, you who seemingly is bereaved that there is no aid as some political failure.

You need to calm down and start comprehending what was written.
 
.
A good definition, but how is it connected to present India ?
"
China on Monday offered $43 billion to the IMF's crisis-fighting reserves, rounding off a global push to nearly double the Fund's war chest to $456 billion to help protect countries from fallout from the euro zone debt crisis.

China's contribution was part of a pledge by Group of 20 countries made in April to supply the International Monetary Fund with extra firepower.

"These resources are being made available for crisis prevention and resolution and to meet the potential financing needs of all IMF members," said IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde.

"They will be drawn only if they are needed as a second line of defense" when other IMF loans have been depleted, she said in a statement during a Group of 20 summit in Mexico.

The leaders of BRICS nations -- Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa -- said earlier that they "agreed to enhance their own contributions to the IMF" but had insisted that the money be used only after existing funds were depleted.

According to a chart published by the IMF, Brazil, Russia and India each pledged $10 billion, while South Africa offered $2 billion. G20 host Mexico also contributed $10 billion."

Does not match the alternate reality in which you stay " ashok".


A good definition, but how is it connected to present India ?

1) Definition is different from description.

You came with a nonsensical statement a la >>> The world bank etc give loans , not aid.
And you got debunked adequately.

2) You have failed to establish till now that the present India is free from aid - which it is NOT.

Now have fun with with Google search engine - albeit futile.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom