AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Its better we requested newer radars or helicopters or something
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First this is not even armed drone it's a survielence drone and finally USA is paying for it @IceCold
One of americas eldest drones i guess.
- Dont know about the camera but, very short range , and unarmed. I would define this is garbage.
defence.pk logic => armed and huge = the best, unarmed and small = potty.Kid real garbage is what you posted and you obviously have no clue about what you are talking. If you have nothing better to contribute, shut up and learn.
Armed drones are not a silver bullet. Armed drones are only used for attack purpose, when you have sold information about the targets and that comes from surveillance.
This is a very small drone, meaning a very small target probably won't even register on a radar. It's small hence operating cost is very minimal too, can be operated by fewer persons and from smaller places. These are tactical drones and very useful if operated from sea vessels.
Earth curvature is about 7.98 inches per mile, in simple words that means you need to go up 7.98 inches every mile to see an object on surface level, out to 100 miles that becomes 66.5 feet. To overcome this limitation either you increase the height of your vessel/watch tower/ radar, and yourself become visible to the object too, or use such tactical small drones to be able to look out hundred of miles and see your enemy well before he sees you.
Send it out in the evening and let it roam the skies for the whole night looking for the enemies at a fraction of the cost of any other platform. This is the key strength that you idiot fan boys don't see. Bigger and faster is not always the solution.
Why you guys relate every thing with ashamed,if there any thing is going to be used to learn then its good think.its not to be ashmedif our knowledge is still behind scan eagle we must be ashamed
And to expand on what you're saying, when good engineers take a closer look at such platforms they absorb years worth of knowledge and experience which is now part of the products' design. This experience adds to the body of knowledge of our own manufacturers. Reaching the same level of maturity would take 10 times as much time on our own (with our precious anaa intact).Well said sir! Every little God damn thing becomes "Anaa ka muamla!!!!"
Concept of acquiring a mature platform, ancillary equipment including the ground control station, with over 800,000 hours of combat flying under the belt will greatly enhance our knowledge and understanding of such systems is totally missed out here.
We can add to our systems what we learn from here.
We r getting three systems with with four UAV's, one "Superwedge" launcher n one "Skyhook" recovery unit and a ground control and imaging station per system.
The deal also includes training. Typically 2 men operate the UAV with a further 2 are used for maintaining the UAV.
if our knowledge is still behind scan eagle we must be ashamed
i am sure we are jahil people thenActually it is. Now tell me, are you ashamed or should I be?