US No Longer Has Resources to Start Full-Scale War Against Iran - Prof

[Tokhme khar]

Bullshit. We see how they fight in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. Don't bullshit yourself. The US is a joker, much like you. Had they known what they are doing, Iran would have been easy to tackle, but it is not the case. Only hindu pak type joker like you guys are scared of them.

As a conventional army, Iran won't even be able to put up a fight. You will have to resort to guerrilla warfare. But then you will also not have a country anymore.

Technology is also reaching a point where small arms are becoming outdated in a conventional war. So even guerrilla warfare will have limits and you will end up resorting to terrorism instead.

Warfare is slowly becoming the domain of the rich and powerful.

 

[Tps43]

Nonsense........msm propaganda. The US hasn't won a single war since WWII, unless you count Grenada or Panama.

Afghan war of 80s?

 

[Tokhme khar]

Still on going........the US has lost big time!

Afghan war of 80s?

 

[GumNaam]

trump could have KSA's crown prince mbs pick up the tab...

 

[Tps43]

Still on going........the US has lost big time!

Not the so called wot I am talking about soviet one

 

[Tokhme khar]

Soviets lost big time too. Now it's the turn of the shitbilly. They too are being shown the door.

Not the so called wot I am talking about soviet one

Attacking and laying to waste countries like Iran, Turkey or Pakestan is beyond the capabilities of the US. We can see this from the last 25 years of rhetoric coming out of the beltway. So in other words.......only Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Germany and Japan were weak enough (small enough populations) to get invaded/ pounded. The US doesn't even have the balls to touch the three strongest muslim non Arab countries. This is a fact folks.......take it as a comment/ observation, if nothing else.

 

[randomradio]

You are wrong, we can stop American in conventional war.

You are only made to believe that by the Iranian propaganda machine. But it's so far from the truth that it's funny.

In a conventional war, only the Soviet Union had the ability to defeat the US.

The Iran of today is not even 1% as strong as the Nazis were during WW2. And the Americans were so much stronger than the Nazis even then, let alone today, and they were still weaker than the Soviets of the time. And this is when the Americans were fighting on multiple fronts.

The reality is even the militaries of India and China today are like flies compared to the US. Even China is 2 decades away when it comes to just putting up a fight, let alone defeat the US in a war. And India is at least 3 decades away.

As for Iran, it will never achieve the required strength to beat the US. In fact, you don't even qualify to put up a fight.

You guys can't even fathom that the $7T that the US spent in their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is literally peanuts to them. There are many companies in the US that are literally ten or more times richer than Iran. Apple's quarterly revenues are twice as big as Iran's yearly revenues. Even Apple can raise an army and defeat the Iranian military, forget the US Government.

 

[Tokhme khar]

Here we have an aboriginal person talking on behalf of shitbilly losers, when they couldn't win in Donbas, SCS, Iraq, Afghanistan Syria, Lebanon and Yemen, despite a $600 billion per year defense budget for the last decade....actually, they haven't won a single war yet since WWII.......if we don't count their police actions in Grenada and Panama......

You are only made to believe that by the Iranian propaganda machine. But it's so far from the truth that it's funny.

In a conventional war, only the Soviet Union had the ability to defeat the US.

The Iran of today is not even 1% as strong as the Nazis were during WW2. And the Americans were so much stronger than the Nazis even then, let alone today, and they were still weaker than the Soviets of the time. And this is when the Americans were fighting on multiple fronts.

The reality is even the militaries of India and China today are like flies compared to the US. Even China is 2 decades away when it comes to just putting up a fight, let alone defeat the US in a war. And India is at least 3 decades away.

As for Iran, it will never achieve the required strength to beat the US. In fact, you don't even qualify to put up a fight.

You guys can't even fathom that the $7T that the US spent in their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is literally peanuts to them. There are many companies in the US that are literally ten or more times richer than Iran. Apple's quarterly revenues are twice as big as Iran's yearly revenues. Even Apple can raise an army and defeat the Iranian military, forget the US Government.

 

[timmy_area51]

 

[OldTwilight]

IF IRI could fight against her Corruption and use some average admins , then I would suggest to get revenge on Israel before the day and force USA to exist the deal , then Iran should leave NPT and make nukes and share "how to do" thing with countries like Turkey , Egypt , KSA , Algeria and put eternal threat on Europe ...
all this is depend on IRI capabilities to fight corruption and mismanagement ...

 

[beijingwalker]

The reality is even the militaries of India and China today are like flies compared to the US. Even China is 2 decades away when it comes to just putting up a fight, let alone defeat the US in a war. And India is at least 3 decades away.

Talking is cheap, why do you ask them to try?

Do you know why US dares not to do anything to North Korea? Because they are afraid of China, whenever they fight a war near China,be Korea or Vietnam, as long as China gets involved , they alwary lose.

 

[VEVAK]

The US is capable of going to war against anybody.

Then why don't they?

There is a major difference from being able to go to war with a country and the pro's outweighing the cons in an unnecessary war against a country who isn't really a threat against your homeland.

Today the U.S. can easily go to war against Iran and win quite quickly using Nukes that is easily within their capability to do but there will be little to nothing to gain in doing so
The U.S. can also start an extremely costly conventional war against Iran in which they may be assured of a tactical military victory but the cost of that victory would make those gains inconsequential and a tactical military victory doesn't always equal to a victory at the end.
And there is no doubt that the U.S. can easily bomb Iranian infrastructure & military bases they can also invade from unpopulated and low populated areas from the east, west & land troops in an unpopulated area of Iran's southern coastline.
But those things don't equal to any type of long term victory in a country of 80 Million people

Now why the U.S. doesn't do this relies mostly on calculation they have made as to what Iran's response to a U.S. attack will look like and whether or not those looses will be worth the gains
Today the U.S. military industrial complex is selling over $100 Billion USD worth of it's outdated equipment (out dated in terms of what it uses it's self)
Today the governments and the leadership in the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait & Saudi Arabia are all U.S. puppets with U.S. bases with vast number of U.S. business interests and by the most part they are dictatorships ruled by a handful of families
Today over 1/4 of the world oil supply flows though the Persian Gulf

So does the US have the ability to attack Iran and achieve a tactical military victory? NO DOUBT they do! Will such an attack be beneficial to U.S. interest and will they be able to maintain a pro U.S. government in Iran if they do so? NOT likely!

 

[WordsMatter]

You are only made to believe that by the Iranian propaganda machine. But it's so far from the truth that it's funny.

In a conventional war, only the Soviet Union had the ability to defeat the US.

The Iran of today is not even 1% as strong as the Nazis were during WW2. And the Americans were so much stronger than the Nazis even then, let alone today, and they were still weaker than the Soviets of the time. And this is when the Americans were fighting on multiple fronts.

The reality is even the militaries of India and China today are like flies compared to the US. Even China is 2 decades away when it comes to just putting up a fight, let alone defeat the US in a war. And India is at least 3 decades away.

As for Iran, it will never achieve the required strength to beat the US. In fact, you don't even qualify to put up a fight.

You guys can't even fathom that the $7T that the US spent in their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is literally peanuts to them. There are many companies in the US that are literally ten or more times richer than Iran. Apple's quarterly revenues are twice as big as Iran's yearly revenues. Even Apple can raise an army and defeat the Iranian military, forget the US Government.

Very well said... the hubris of IRI agents on this forum is just beyond belief. As if they live in an alternate reality. To think IRI, with its dilapidated military, corrupt elite and politicians can stand against the US Goliath is hilarious. Not even the Chinese claim such grandiose BS. But then again most IRI agents who say this need to earn their keeps otherwise the IRGC Intelligence arm would be very unhappy with them.

 

[brainiac3397]

The US definitely has the resources, the problem is that it has the wrong resources. For the last few decades, American politicians have been using and manipulating the military for their own political agenda. American fighter jets are falling apart so what does Congress do? Buy more tanks. We don't need more tanks. We have enough tanks. But guess what, those tanks are built by their constitutents in their states who now have more work to do.

Thus, the US military is getting resources it doesn't need and isn't getting the resources it needs because the politicians are wasting the money. To make matters worse, the US politicians don't really care about the military. During the Iraq War, Marines told Rumsfeld that their vehicles didn't have armor so they had to use scrap metal to stick on. He just told them that the US military is great because it's able to improvise(Which is an idiotic response. Why not stop sending crap instead?).

If the US went to war with Iran, it'd be humilitated like it was in Vietnam and instead of the politicians being blamed for undersupporting the military, the military leaders were be blamed and the US military would just lose even more power and influence.

 

[beijingwalker]

Why didn't US try North Korea, that's the country consistently shouts war cry threatening to nuke and wipe US off the face of the earth and they do have nuclear weapons, it's a hard fact that the whole world knows for sure. Why US never threatens North Korea with a war, where's US guts when it comes to North Korea?

We always know that US is nothing but big talk. with their fast declining economic and industrial strength, people will see more and more talking but less and less actions in the future, they just don't have the money to do what they used to be able to do.