US kills al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in drone strike in Afghanistan

[Indos]

It's needed a hard brain damage to believe 911 attacks was done by AlQaeda or any other group than US deep state.

That event where the year 2000 will be the moment for AQ to launch big attack even is known by what we call as non leadership affiliated AQ organization in Indonesia several years before the event. The detail is not known by non leadership, but something big is about to happen has already been informed.

You live in Spain, where AQ linked organization is very small or even non existence. The one who believe on the conspiration theory is more like Awam people, who dont have connection to intelligence institution or terrorist link organization.

As I said, whether CIA let it to happen, is another matter

 

[kingQamaR]

Is

Is It sarcastic?
Taliban itself a terrorist organization.

This kill will irk al-qaida more against Pakistan. Bcz drone took off from Pakistan.
So basically from al-qaida perspective Pakistan is with kufar America.

Perfect example of a petty fool right here... concerned about Pakistani things like the Taliban and Al-Qaida you people are so micro focused and small-minded it is pathetic. is this what trash comic news your government spoon feeds you trolls in slums

 

[Khan_patriot]

Good riddance

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

AlQaeda is a real terrorist group and must be destroyed.

But that is unrelated to 911 attacks.

You want to believe what you want to be true although it is not true...

 

[ProudPak]

Woow
Amazed at the comments

 

[gambit]

Going against Taliban will only make things worse, cause if Taliban and ISIS join hands than we are looking a new wave of Terror attacks around the world, and than we are back to where we started, Taliban are loose canon let them run their country, they will be busy fighting ISIS and EX Govt who are trying to resist for a long time, I think USA learned their lesson that few misplaced bomb do more damage than it solves anything.

We are against the Taliban, so worse for who? We took over Afghanistan and tried to rehabilitate the country and we failed. I have no problems saying 'failed'. But does Al-Qaeda consider what they are doing as a failure? Of course not. Does the Islamic State? Equally no. So how is it 'worse'? As far as these groups are concerned, that there are 'infidels' is enough to justify what they do. By leaving Afghanistan to the Taliban, we have returned to square one.

 

[Bilal9]

Killing this old "asset" is not gonna matter, whether staged or real. The splinter groups and sleeper cells did not listen to him anyway. Pointless but a moral booster for Biden I'm sure, which he needed desperately..

 

[Dariush the Great]

We are against the Taliban, so worse for who? We took over Afghanistan and tried to rehabilitate the country and we failed. I have no problems saying 'failed'. But does Al-Qaeda consider what they are doing as a failure? Of course not. Does the Islamic State? Equally no. So how is it 'worse'? As far as these groups are concerned, that there are 'infidels' is enough to justify what they do. By leaving Afghanistan to the Taliban, we have returned to square one.

Nope, you invaded Afghanistan and tried to take it over and failed. You also failed in establishing a puppet regime. After many deaths, trillions of wasted money you escaped in the most disgraceful way.

 

[gambit]

Took trillions of dollars and 20 years to know that.

You can look at it two ways: Either we were stupid or too idealistic.

Nope, you invaded Afghanistan and tried to take it over and failed. You also failed in establishing a puppet regime. After many deaths, trillions of wasted money you escaped in the most disgraceful way.

No arguments there. But is that the best you got?

 

[El Sidd]

American unilateral actions end up undermining war on terror. The Afghan government already has a 2 front war on their hands, ISIS-K and Northern Alliance warlords.

Hopefully this will bring closure to victims of attacks attributed to the targeted individual.

 

[Dariush the Great]

You can look at it two ways: Either we were stupid or too idealistic.


No arguments there. But is that the best you got?

Just funny that you made it sound so awesome for the US ''We took over, fk yea mrica mcdonalds''

You took over nothing, there were large areas under Taliban control

 

[gambit]

Just funny that you made it sound so awesome for the US ''We took over, fk yea mrica mcdonalds''

You took over nothing, there were large areas under Taliban control

We were over there, and for 20 yrs, we put little girls into school.

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Perfect example of a petty fool right here... concerned about Pakistani things like the Taliban and Al-Qaida you people are so micro focused and small-minded it is pathetic. is this what trash comic news your government spoon feeds you trolls in slums

Counter with logic. Not with your upbringing.

 

[fatman17]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1554220893336993792

Its about damn time. Rot in hell

Whose air corridor did the US use?

 

[Tomcats]

Also do note, this confirms that the Taliban have violated the Doha Accord in which they stated they would cut off contact with such groups. Instead they are allowing them to settle in the capital with aid from the government itself. So yeah make of that what you will, I'll call it 'foreshadowing' for a certain other deal...