US Jets bombed Syrian town with banned Chemical weapons

[500]

USA uses WP. Confirmed from Iraq. Israel uses WP confirmed in Gaza. WP is ban for offensive use. It is only allowed to be used as smoke screen not as bomb.

US and Israel use WP in smoke artillery shells. Which is not banned. US and Israeli jets dont use any WP.

WP is a chemical weapon and is banned.

No, its not a chemical weapon and its not banned.

Assad is a confirmed chemical weapon used by UN and OPCW.

 

[Lincoln]

1) US air force does not use WP.

2) WP is not banned.

Two lies in one sentence from Russia.

3) WP is not a chemical weapon. A lie from topic starter.

Overall we have 3 lies in first message.

1. Except they do and have used it before. See the links below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A-1E_drops_white_phosphorus_bomb_1966.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:White_Phosphorous_Rockets.jpg

2. It is banned for certain situations, you can visit https://www.icrc.org/en/document/1980-convention-certain-conventional-weapons#.VKkpP2SG-rY, download the file and check Protocol III. White Phosphorus although not categorized as a chemical weapon, it is an incendiary weapon. It cannot be dropped on civilians, places with concentrations of civilians, and it cannot be delivered by air in such places. So thereby dropping it in a city is indeed against the Geneva Convention.

It is true it is mainly used as an incendiary weapon for mainly shielding and to put markings of site of impact. However, White Phosphorus CAN be used as a chemical weapon, you can see it`s effects in the link below, go to the heading 'Signs/Symptoms' on the webpage.

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750025.html

 

[Valeriu]

This is RT.....Tommorow they'll say that Putin is God s messenger on Earth

 

[HannibalBarca]

So ppl are arguing about WP... When the main subject is... "Where Is The proof?" Or shall we believe RT/Sputnik? as if those guys are the "Truth"...

 

[Lincoln]

This is RT.....Tommorow they'll say that Putin is God s messenger on Earth

Oh, so we trust BBC and CNN perhaps : ) ?

 

[HannibalBarca]

Oh, so we trust BBC and CNN perhaps : ) ?

at least they give "their" proofs...While RT/SPutnik... Give their "Words" as a proof...
Or maybe when you watch any FoxNews you believe?

Here for you...
"New types of Aliens appeared in Antarctica...By RT"

Just believe... it's easier.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

So ppl are arguing about WP... When the main subject is... "Where Is The proof?" Or shall we believe RT/Sputnik? as if those guys are the "Truth"...

we did believe ysa before iraq war . where are wmds?

 

[rambro]

There are only a handful of countries that can outright attack others with impunity

no prize for guessing.

 

[HannibalBarca]

we did believe ysa before iraq war . where are wmds?

BBC or CNN never gave "Proof" of WMDs... US officials did... that's a difference... One is giving the news...Not creating it...
Every news outlet reported the WMDs news...even Russian news outlet...
No one could said at that time if US officials were right or not... Not the fault of the Media...

 

[Valeriu]

Oh, so we trust BBC and CNN perhaps : ) ?

nope.never

 

[Lincoln]

BBC or CNN never gave "Proof" of WMDs... US officials did... that's a difference... One is giving the news...Not creating it...
Every news outlet reported the WMDs news...even Russian news outlet...

Quit making a fool out of yourself and read the article then. This is not RT saying it, this is the Russian Defense Ministry saying it.

https://www.rt.com/news/438008-us-strikes-syria-white-phosphorus/

 

[HannibalBarca]

Quit making a fool out of yourself and read the article then. This is not RT saying it, this is the Russian Defense Ministry saying it.

https://www.rt.com/news/438008-us-strikes-syria-white-phosphorus/

Still, where is the proof... Why when it's RU, you have to believe...
When Chemical weapons are documented in Syria with physical proof... You guys don't believe... So now why should we for RU words?

RT/Sputnik and the RU gov is the same guys... or even that you don't believe?

See the bias Logic of you guys?

 

[Lincoln]

Still, where is the proof... Why when it's RU, you have to believe...
When Chemical weapons are documented in Syria with physical proof... You guys don't believe... So now why should we for RU words?

RT/Sputnik and the RU gov is the same guys... or even that you don't believe?

See the bias Logic of you guys?

The country which destroyed another saying they had weapons of mass destruction now wants to destroy another country saying they have chemical weapons. Which one do I believe? I do have bias and for the right reasons.

What's the proof that the Chemical weapons are being dropped in Syria are being done so by the Syrian Government and not the Rebels or the United States?

Also, because RT is apparently RU government that means it doesn't count if the government makes a statement which is then cited by RT? But it's fine if the US makes a statement and it's cited by CNN or BBC and is considered as undeniable proof, what's the logic in that?

 

[HannibalBarca]

The country which destroyed another saying they had weapons of mass destruction now wants to destroy another country saying they have chemical weapons. Which one do I believe? I do have bias and for the right reasons.

What's the proof that the Chemical weapons are being dropped in Syria are being done so by the Syrian Government and not the Rebels or the United States?

Also, because RT is apparently RU government that means it doesn't count if the government makes a statement which is then cited by RT? But it's fine if the US makes a statement and it's cited by CNN or BBC and is considered as undeniable proof, what's the logic in that?

The logic is simple... What you say equal ZERO... Not in the sense that I don't care about your opinion...But Since RU strat since years is to flood the "Truth" with multiple "Opinions" Then NEither the Pro-RU or Pro-US can/should trust neither of them...

Can't you see the pattern... What you say don't matter as long as you don't believe in it... Truth and Facts aren't important for the simple minded ppl... Because it's too hard for them to search/Accept an alternative in what they "think" to be true...
Like yourself per exemple... When you put against each other their "Truth" RU and US... You try to find the one you hate the most and believe the other just for the sake of it...

And on the simplest way to see or not if you believe in something because of its ability to seek the real truth..It's when a retarded RT article is made on Pakistan...Where at this moment... from nowhere you find the will to say "RT BS news"... Why then? Well as long as your ego is not fed...you will not abide by their "Truth"...

All of RU strategy is to target ppl like you... and it's working... Since instead of providing me with proof that they are right...You try to prove me that the enemy is wrong...

 

[Lincoln]

The logic is simple... What you say equal ZERO... Not in the sense that I don't care about your opinion...But Since RU strat since years is to flood the "Truth" with multiple "Opinions" Then NEither the Pro-RU or Pro-US can/should trust neither of them...

Can't you see the pattern... What you say don't matter as long as you don't believe in it... Truth and Facts aren't important for the simple minded ppl... Because it's too hard for them to search/Accept an alternative in what they "think" to be true...
Like yourself per exemple... When you put against each other their "Truth" RU and US... You try to find the one you hate the most and believe the other just for the sake of it...

And on the simplest way to see or not if you believe in something because of its ability to seek the real truth..It's when a retarded RT article is made on Pakistan...Where at this moment... from nowhere you find the will to say "RT BS news"... Why then? Well as long as your ego is not fed...you will not abide by their "Truth"...

All of RU strategy is to target ppl like you... and it's working... Since instead of providing me with proof that they are right...You try to prove me that the enemy is wrong...

Lmao, you wrote all that telling me basically about bias and generalizing. Good job, sir.

Now, you seem to be a person who loves proof, right? Well, give me proof that it is the Syrian Government that has used the Chemical Weapons and not anyone else, and instead of opting to believe a country that has lied before, I will believe that.