What's new

US Jets bombed Syrian town with banned Chemical weapons

Oh, so we trust BBC and CNN perhaps : ) ?

Even US President Trump calls CNN fake news:
Donald-Trump-Fake-News-Tweet.jpg

BBC is even worse. It is founded by English regime, and BBC protected rapist Jimmy Savile. Nothing is more disgusting than BBC.
 
Lmao, you wrote all that telling me basically about bias and generalizing. Good job, sir.

Now, you seem to be a person who loves proof, right? Well, give me proof that it is the Syrian Government that has used the Chemical Weapons and not anyone else, and instead of opting to believe a country that has lied before, I will believe that.

Well you clearly didn't understood... Anyway... Not like I care, but I did try...

As for If Western Media or RU media are good or bad...Even That I don't care... Most of them nowadays take their "news" from ppl like me or you, who are willing to share their experience on social media... But the Difference btw BCC/CNN and RT/SPutnik is quite simple... They do the same job, They report the news... But One is trying to stay in the Middle, And the other is letting himself be used Whenever Gov wish... That's the difference...

You can see it as a Madam vs Prostitute...

And last, about Chemical Weapons... Well The proof are found and complied by "independent" organizations... That Pakistan is part of btw and Not by the US gov or CNN/BBC...
So, here they are Free to be browsed on the net... Whatever you wish to believe or not... That up to you...

And Don't get me wrong... I don't care about US or RU prestige... Just wanted to put an alternative view on the subject...

The RU strategy open the door that "Everyone" got the true "Truth"... Therefore an ISIS/AQ/Anti-Pakistani outlet per exemple is "Right"... Since RU logic or yours can apply to them...
 
Well you clearly didn't understood... Anyway... Not like I care, but I did try...

As for If Western Media or RU media are good or bad...Even That I don't care... Most of them nowadays take their "news" from ppl like me or you, who are willing to share their experience on social media... But the Difference btw BCC/CNN and RT/SPutnik is quite simple... They do the same job, They report the news... But One is trying to stay in the Middle, And the other is letting himself be used Whenever Gov wish... That's the difference...

You can see it as a Madam vs Prostitute...

And last, about Chemical Weapons... Well The proof are found and complied by "independent" organizations... That Pakistan is part of btw and Not by the US gov or CNN/BBC...
So, here they are Free to be browsed on the net... Whatever you wish to believe or not... That up to you...

And Don't get me wrong... I don't care about US or RU prestige... Just wanted to put an alternative view on the subject...

The RU strategy open the door that "Everyone" got the true "Truth"... Therefore an ISIS/AQ/Anti-Pakistani outlet per exemple is "Right"... Since RU logic or yours can apply to them...

Don't just tell me there is proof, give me the proof. Any articles, links, reports, anything.
 
Don't just tell me there is proof, give me the proof. Any articles, links, reports, anything.
You can search for it...
But It's not like you care...Since you have your own belief...
Everything is false for you... But hey... Let's try... Here few among many...

https://www.opcw.org/news/article/o...-in-al-hamadaniya-and-karm-al-tarrab-in-2016/
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/men...-syrias-chlorine-bombs-douma-chemical-attack/

Ps: In case you get the "It' snot true vibe"... Just remember that ASSad Did abide by "allegedly" removing his Chemical stock after "ACCEPTING" his "ALLEGED MISTAKE" of using it in 2012-2013... Just saying...If you didn't understood this sentence... it means "ASSad said he did for the first attack"... and RU accepted to be the guarantor of "removing" the stock back in the days...

And last... The US/Zionist/TR fantasy that they gave them chemical canister... Just remember that Ghouta was an enclave next to Damascus SINCE the beginning of the conflict, in few Words it means "NO CONTACT WITH ANYONE SINCE THE BEGINNING"...

When such "Precision" are given to ppl who behave like you...Their answer is always the same " You Terro supporter" and then they rage quit... Let's see your reaction...
 
always trust the nation blocking UN investigation in chemical weapon use... like Russia...and totaly belive them if they make a claim who is useing chemical weapons.... get real kids..
 
You can search for it...
But It's not like you care...Since you have your own belief...
Everything is false for you... But hey... Let's try... Here few among many...

https://www.opcw.org/news/article/o...-in-al-hamadaniya-and-karm-al-tarrab-in-2016/
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/men...-syrias-chlorine-bombs-douma-chemical-attack/

Ps: In case you get the "It' snot true vibe"... Just remember that ASSad Did abide by "allegedly" removing his Chemical stock after "ACCEPTING" his "ALLEGED MISTAKE" of using it in 2012-2013... Just saying...If you didn't understood this sentence... it means "ASSad said he did for the first attack"... and RU accepted to be the guarantor of "removing" the stock back in the days...

And last... The US/Zionist/TR fantasy that they gave them chemical canister... Just remember that Ghouta was an enclave next to Damascus SINCE the beginning of the conflict, in few Words it means "NO CONTACT WITH ANYONE SINCE THE BEGINNING"...

When such "Precision" are given to ppl who behave like you...Their answer is always the same " You Terro supporter" and then they rage quit... Let's see your reaction...

You make a claim, you prove it. Can't get simpler than that.

But anyways, thanks for the citations and for proving yourself wrong.

Firstly, I will ignore the bellingcat link because that is a news agency.

Now, onto the link provided that of OPCW, since you didn't bother to read the very article you linked, let me ease the pain of opening a link for you. The report states, " The results show that no organophosphorous nerve agents or their degradation products were detected in the environmental samples or in the plasma samples taken from alleged casualties.", and also that, "The Fact-Finding Mission also issued a report on 2 July 2018 addressing allegations of chemical weapons use in Al-Hamadaniya, Syria on 30 October 2016, and Karm al-Tarrab, Syria on 13 November 2016. On the basis of the information received and analysed, the prevailing narrative of the interviews, and the results of the laboratory analyses, the FFM cannot confidently determine whether or not a specific chemical was used as a weapon in the incidents that took place in the neighbourhood of Al-Hamadaniyah and in the area of Karm al-Tarrab."
 
You make a claim, you prove it. Can't get simpler than that.

But anyways, thanks for the citations and for proving yourself wrong.

Firstly, I will ignore the bellingcat link because that is a news agency.

Now, onto the link provided that of OPCW, since you didn't bother to read the very article you linked, let me ease the pain of opening a link for you. The report states, " The results show that no organophosphorous nerve agents or their degradation products were detected in the environmental samples or in the plasma samples taken from alleged casualties.", and also that, "The Fact-Finding Mission also issued a report on 2 July 2018 addressing allegations of chemical weapons use in Al-Hamadaniya, Syria on 30 October 2016, and Karm al-Tarrab, Syria on 13 November 2016. On the basis of the information received and analysed, the prevailing narrative of the interviews, and the results of the laboratory analyses, the FFM cannot confidently determine whether or not a specific chemical was used as a weapon in the incidents that took place in the neighbourhood of Al-Hamadaniyah and in the area of Karm al-Tarrab."

See... Useless... Why should you give your opinion when you didn't bother checking for what you asked?
Anyway... You are not the first neither the last... So, My Intervention wasn't entirely for you... But since you played your part in my line of though, I thank you...At least the "Next Lurking Guy" will get a glimpse on how many among you behave/ Wish to behave...

It was a pleasure... Knowing "another" one of you guys... At least you didn't end up swearing or rage quit as the others...
 
US will protect human right all over the Globe and good luck to those who will receive it
 
See... Useless... Why should you give your opinion when you didn't bother checking for what you asked?
Anyway... You are not the first neither the last... So, My Intervention wasn't entirely for you... But since you played your part in my line of though, I thank you...At least the "Next Lurking Guy" will get a glimpse on how many among you behave/ Wish to behave...

It was a pleasure... Knowing "another" one of you guys... At least you didn't end up swearing or rage quit as the others...

Lmao, so your own link proves you wrong so you resort to saying simply that I am just another biased deluded person who should search on his own.

I am sorry but is this some criminal case that I am supposed to provide evidence for your claims. It's a basic principle, make a claim, provide the evidence for it.

Also, I did check your link referred to on the organization webpage, and quoted to you there's findings. You chose to ignore it.

Good job on proving yourself again and again though only to end up spinning me off as a biased deluded person. Keep it up and keep telling people to find evidence on their own for your claims.
 
1. Except they do and have used it before. See the links below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A-1E_drops_white_phosphorus_bomb_1966.jpg
1966? LOL You seriously try to prove with 52 year old pic?

2. It is banned for certain situations, you can visit https://www.icrc.org/en/document/1980-convention-certain-conventional-weapons#.VKkpP2SG-rY, download the file and check Protocol III. White Phosphorus although not categorized as a chemical weapon, it is an incendiary weapon. It cannot be dropped on civilians, places with concentrations of civilians, and it cannot be delivered by air in such places. So thereby dropping it in a city is indeed against the Geneva Convention.
So u confirm my point. WP is not banned. Only if it used as incendiary weapon in certain circumstances.

Russian MoD are pathological liars.
 
they used nukes on japan which means they can use an weapon
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom