US committed to a permanent seat for India in a reformed UN Security Council

[jamahir]

what the hell is "reformed uno security council"??

there can be either a reformed uno ( and consequent abolishment of uno-sc ) or uno must be abolished/paralleled.

What would make the world sit and take notice of India is if India grows and become the world's economic engine.

janaab, india's economy is majorly majorly dependent upon the west... secondly, what is "world's economic engine"??

 

[ito]

what the hell is "reformed uno security council"??

there can be either a reformed uno ( and consequent abolishment of uno-sc ) or uno must be abolished/paralleled.



janaab, india's economy is majorly majorly dependent upon the west... secondly, what is "world's economic engine"??

Every country's economy is dependent on other's. That is how economies are inter twinned and work. West was a big market for Chinese goods. Similarly China was a cheap good producer for west. Economic engine is something that acts as catalyst for economic growth for many countries.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Permanent UNSC seat vs Permanent UNSC seat with Veto powers ... 2 different things.

 

[ito]

Permanent UNSC seat vs Permanent UNSC seat with Veto powers ... 2 different things.

I don't think India would agree for a seat without a veto.

 

[Hindustani78]

Focus on growing economy, GDP per capita and military power than other nations like Russia, UK and France and then demand permanent seat.

For the past 7 years , India has showed that it deserve permanent UNSC seat.

India's economy is growing and its even stable. India do have the third largest military which is already working to maintain world peace and India contributed nearly 180,000 troops, the largest by any country in UN peace keeping force.

I don't think India would agree for a seat without a veto.

India has to get Permanent UN Seat with full powers similar like P5.

 

[jamahir]

India has to get Permanent UN Seat with full powers similar like P5.

which will not happen... india at present is not a leader but sadly a western camp follower.

 

[ito]

For the past 7 years , India has showed that it deserve permanent UNSC seat.

India's economy is growing and its even stable. India do have the third largest military which is already working to maintain world peace and India contributed nearly 180,000 troops, the largest by any country in UN peace keeping force.



India has to get Permanent UN Seat with full powers similar like P5.

That is what India has been insisting.

 

[Taygibay]

How the hell does that little RAT france deserve an entire seat at the UNSC?

Due to your confusing flags, I cannot truly know what your stand is ( Türkiye I'd guess ) and
I usually try not to get involved in discussions about France that are impolite or trollish but …

Mali, RCA, Barkhane, support to Iraq's fight against Da'esh without involvement in Syria all
show that little rat to come to the rescue of its international partners and needy countries as
soon ( and fast ) as it is required while India cannot maintain peace within its own borders.
That little rat has maintained peace and collaboration with all its immediate neighbors for the
last 70 years even those like Germany with whom it had major ( 1871-WW I-WW II ) bugs.

Wake me up when India is at peace with Pakistan, China and Bangladesh without any chan-
ce of a war erupting and commits the necessary troops to saving foreign lands, not just BHs.

Accessorily, as indicated above, that rat is not the one in the P5 slowing India's access to a
veto and along the UK was almost alone in not sanctioning it in 1998.

I don't p1ss on Turkey nor the Netherlands ( why? there's no need, they are a threat to no one );
keep your insults to yourself, especially in matters that do not concern you & about which you
no precious little, please!

Tay.

 

[Rank]

For the past 7 years , India has showed that it deserve permanent UNSC seat.

India's economy is growing and its even stable. India do have the third largest military which is already working to maintain world peace and India contributed nearly 180,000 troops, the largest by any country in UN peace keeping force.



India has to get Permanent UN Seat with full powers similar like P5.

what is your contribution in world peace by the way ? LOL 1,80,000 troops in Africa not world lol ... You never ever participate in any global conflicts pr issues... just batain batain batain... nothing else more...

India has no power on ground in terms of military power projection and the solo powers knew that India will never ever participate with them in any conflict because of fear of backfire.

These solo powers like Russia, USA and China which include France and UK are completely independent in military and military hardware. On the other side India is highly DEPENDENT on foreign military hardware. India is biggest arm importer. Accept the reality no one is interested in power sharing or offering Veto power tu duur ke baat hey even UNSC permanent seat (without veto).... unke aankh say dekhoo jinhonay agaay lagaya huwa hey.. they're just getting $$ from you and thats all... US knew that keep pushing India in their circle while passing such statements. In real US is also not interested too...

 

[Hindustani78]

That is what India has been insisting.

African countries, Arab countries, Latin American countries, Asian Countries, Central Asian Republics and enough EU members states supports Permanent seat for India.

 

[Manindra]

LMAO.....so you really believe you have more influence than we and France.

You are British still have comprehension issue in English

 

[Hindustani78]

what is your contribution in world peace by the way ? LOL 1,80,000 troops in Africa not world lol ... You never ever participate in any global conflicts pr issues... just batain batain batain... nothing else more...

Republic of India is helping African countries in improving living standards and providing medicines , helping in telecommunication, power, irrigation and Agriculture sector and can even help in space and civilian Nuclear sector if needed.

 

[Rank]

Republic of India is helping African countries in improving living standards and providing medicines , helping in telecommunication, power, irrigation and Agriculture sector and can even help in space and civilian Nuclear sector if needed.

Sir g have you been into Africa ? or any of your relative... let me know that i will get you back sir.

PS: My uncle serve in UN Africa.... He is still on the mission since 2003. Trust me... i know your and everyone investment... and how these solo powers playing with poor.

 

[Hindustani78]

Sir g have you been into Africa ? or any of your relative... let me know that i will get you back sir.

PS: My uncle serve in UN Africa.... He is still on the mission since 2003. Trust me... i know your and everyone investment... and how these solo powers playing with poor.

I know thats why i am saying .

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

I don't think India would agree for a seat without a veto.

It really isn't about what India thinks, but what every single one of the current P5 thinks, and whether the world believes that the addition of yet more veto powers (instead of removing or diluting the existing ones) is progress and will help the UNSC function better.

India's demand for a veto in the UNSC is regressive and damaging for the United Nations, and further widens the international caste system and global inequalities.

India is on the wrong side of history on this issue. While plenty of nations would support a permanent Indian UNSC seat today, adding a veto into the mix helps no one and does nothing except massage India's ego.

This isn't the International Cricket Council representing perhaps 5 significant cricket revenue generating nations, where India will be able to push through what it wants because it has a lock on the majority of cricket revenues.