CenterLeft
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2015
- Messages
- 93
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
There are 4 very good reasons why US cannot attack Pakistan.
1. Attacking Pakistan means the US would be attacking their own supply lines to Afghanistan. Attacking from the Arabian Sea or from Afghanistan itself means starving the Afghan mission of resources and having the Taliban make a run for Kabul. The US will need to withdraw from Afghanistan before taking on Pakistan.
2. Fighting a nuclear armed country is different from fighting a non-nuclear country. With the development of the Nasr missile, Pakistan has demonstrated the capability to miniaturize nuclear weapons. A suitcase bomb in a flight to Chicago, or a container shipped to Europe would be a nightmare. Alarm bells will be ringing in London and Paris before the ink is dry on the press release from the Ministry of Defence.
3. Talking of nightmares, the West's worst nightmare is nuclear weapons "falling into the hands of terrorists." Pakistan can make that happen.
4. The US has not won a war since 1945. Pakistan is 2.5 times larger than Iran and 6 times larger than Iraq and Afghanistan. After not winning in Iraq and Afghanistan, the neocons have been itching to attack Iran. Despite bipartisan support, this would be very difficult to pull off even though Iran is systematically demonized in the Western press. Iran would be a bite too big to chew. If Iran is difficult to attack despite the demonization, how difficult is it to Pakistan to attack? It has not been demonized as much and is even a bigger bite. And it does not even pose a direct threat to Israel.
So quit dreaming. Donald Trump may look dumb. He isn't this dumb. And no my Indian friends, Trump isn't going to fight the war for you that you yourself cannot fight. The US has run out of countries to attack. The only ones left standing today are too difficult to destabilize without problems coming back to haunt the US. Examples include China, North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, Turkey, etc. These countries are therefore natural allies to each other.
1. Attacking Pakistan means the US would be attacking their own supply lines to Afghanistan. Attacking from the Arabian Sea or from Afghanistan itself means starving the Afghan mission of resources and having the Taliban make a run for Kabul. The US will need to withdraw from Afghanistan before taking on Pakistan.
2. Fighting a nuclear armed country is different from fighting a non-nuclear country. With the development of the Nasr missile, Pakistan has demonstrated the capability to miniaturize nuclear weapons. A suitcase bomb in a flight to Chicago, or a container shipped to Europe would be a nightmare. Alarm bells will be ringing in London and Paris before the ink is dry on the press release from the Ministry of Defence.
3. Talking of nightmares, the West's worst nightmare is nuclear weapons "falling into the hands of terrorists." Pakistan can make that happen.
4. The US has not won a war since 1945. Pakistan is 2.5 times larger than Iran and 6 times larger than Iraq and Afghanistan. After not winning in Iraq and Afghanistan, the neocons have been itching to attack Iran. Despite bipartisan support, this would be very difficult to pull off even though Iran is systematically demonized in the Western press. Iran would be a bite too big to chew. If Iran is difficult to attack despite the demonization, how difficult is it to Pakistan to attack? It has not been demonized as much and is even a bigger bite. And it does not even pose a direct threat to Israel.
So quit dreaming. Donald Trump may look dumb. He isn't this dumb. And no my Indian friends, Trump isn't going to fight the war for you that you yourself cannot fight. The US has run out of countries to attack. The only ones left standing today are too difficult to destabilize without problems coming back to haunt the US. Examples include China, North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, Turkey, etc. These countries are therefore natural allies to each other.