What's new

US - China Cold war begins, Will India join?

Think again..until some miracle happens, no country can challenge US's standing in the world for another century.

that's you Indians perspective cause you had been under western colonial rule for too long,but the world doesnt share your mentality.

Pew survey finds China seen as top economic power
Bloomberg Businessweek - 14 Jun 2012

BEIJING — For the first time, people responding to a global survey are more likely to view China and not the United States as the world's leading economic power.

The results of the Pew Research Center survey do not reflect reality: America's economy remains well ahead of its closest rival. But it does highlight China's steadily rising public image amid rapid growth, as well as the erosion of the United States' status as the global superpower, especially after the 2008 financial crisis left it struggling with recession and high unemployment.

The 21-nation poll found that 41 percent of people said China was the world's economic power, while 40 percent favored the U.S. Among the 14 nations that were asked the same question in 2008, the margin was wider: 45 percent placed the U.S. on top four years ago, with just 22 percent for China, but in the latest poll China was favored 42 percent to 36 percent.

The trend was especially strong in Europe: 58 percent of people in Britain saw China as the leading economy, versus just 28 percent for the United States. Even in the U.S., respondents were about evenly divided on the question. Turkey and Mexico were the only countries where more than half of people consider the United States the leading economic power.

"Over the last few years, perceptions about the global economic balance of power have been shifting," Pew said in the report.

China passed Germany as the biggest exporter in 2009 and has overtaken Japan as the world's second-biggest economy. But its situation is complex: It is relatively poor by income per person, while the United States is among the richest. The United States is the global center for the auto, computer, finance, aerospace and other industries.

China's competitive edge is its large pool of low-cost labor, but that is shrinking as wages rise and the Chinese population ages. The World Bank and the communist government's own advisers warn it must make basic changes to its economic strategy to boost productivity and keep incomes rising.

Those nuances are reflected in the Chinese public's more tempered views of their country in the Pew survey. Only 29 percent of people interviewed saw it as the leading economy, versus 48 percent for the United States.

The polls were nationally representative surveys conducted in March and April by 26,210 telephone or in-person interviews in 21 countries, including Brazil, Japan, India, France, Egypt, Tunisia, Pakistan and the United States.

The survey also found that China's image has grown more negative over the past year in the United States, Japan and parts of Europe.

Across the 21 nations surveyed, the median percentage with positive views of China and the United States were about the same, at 49 percent and 52 percent, respectively. But Pew noted that overall figure concealed big differences in some countries. In Japan, 72 percent saw the U.S. favorably, versus just 15 percent for China. In Pakistan, 85 percent saw China favorably while just 12 percent said the same for the United States.

The Associated Press

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jun/13/pew-survey-finds-china-seen-as-top-economic-power/
 
.
Thin about this China Declared 90B$/year spending on avg over 10 years ..

America declared spending 700b$/year on avg over 10 years.



Who the fk in the right mind would even compare.
 
. .
China just needs to take over the South China Sea and the East China Sea and this so-called Cold War is over :lol:
 
.
that's you Indians perspective cause you had been under western colonial rule for too long,but the world doesnt share your mentality.

Thats the typical response that you Chinese give for not cheerleading you. Also top economic power doesn't really transform into a super power.

Thin about this China Declared 90B$/year spending on avg over 10 years ..

America declared spending 700b$/year on avg over 10 years.



Who the fk in the right mind would even compare.

Or in otherwords the biggest military power the mankind had ever seen.
 
.
Thats the typical response that you Chinese give for not cheerleading you. Also top economic power doesn't really transform into a super power.

.

won't be long,we focus on the economy first,USSR focused military first and went bankrupt,we wont follow their path,once you become the top economic power,other success will come with it.US also first claimed economic superemacy and went for military.
 
.
It's a stupid article.

B-1 is not stealthy. It has no chance of survival against China's modern, integrated, and over-lapping air defenses.

----------

EFMWo.jpg


Reference: Radar Cross Section (RCS)
You call your self American(I know you are (Han Chinese) but you don't know anything about US military. B1 only operates to destroy ground targets including mass or carpet bombing to flatten the enemy. They operate when airspace is cleared & SAM launchers are neutralized. They always fly in conjunction with strike fighter planes like F15 SE.
 
.
Another century???

Even U.S. does not believe that. :)

I have to agree that indian people are always confident, not only in themselves, but also someone they worship. :)

Think again..until some miracle happens, no country can challenge US's standing in the world for another century.
 
.
won't be long,we focus on the economy first,USSR focused military first and went bankrupt,we wont follow their path,once you become the top economic power,other success will come with it.US also first claimed economic superemacy and went for military.

Dude US spends 700 billion per year on an average and supposedly maintains 700+ bases around the world. They even own a island base in Indian Ocean. I don't see China matching that in the near future. May be after 100 years perhaps.

Another century???

Even U.S. does not believe that. :)

I have to agree that indian people are always confident, not only in themselves, but also someone they worship. :)

Again another typical reply for not supporting you.
 
.
Dude US spends 700 billion per year on an average and supposedly maintains 700+ bases around the world. They even own a island base in Indian Ocean. I don't see China matching that in the near future. May be after 100 years perhaps.

.

Have to agree on this The USA will remain the sole superpower for time to come and China won't spend as much as it.
 
. .
Have to agree on this The USA will remain the sole superpower for time to come and China won't spend as much as it.

Thank you for a level headed reply. Best of luck for China on their journey to Super Powerdom, but until your spending cannot match US i don't see you reaching that position.
 
.
maybe I don't know that much,but I m pretty sure this guy knows that better than you.

Sorry!..I thought this was about USA and China?????...I have been following your posts for the last 1 year or so....You never stick to the topic..as far as your cut and paste of what other news or people have written try posting something of your own...Opps sorry...You guys dont do original stuff...Never mind!:pop:
 
.
Thank you for a level headed reply. Best of luck for China on their journey to Super Powerdom, but until your spending cannot match US i don't see you reaching that position.

Superpower maybe not for the next 20-30 years but that's not the main focus first focus is Economy military comes after that a good lesson learned from the USA is not to overspend.
 
.
Who remembers these Hindustanians talking bad about Turkey on Syria conflict??

They are sh*tting their pants now or what? :D India must join and not be affraid. You always joined for the sake of imperialism, why now holding back? =DDDDD

India Urged Again To Pursue Non-Alignment

Non-alignment was and is a logical, rational and ethical response to this polarisation and pervasive iniquity. Non-alignment didn't mean passive neutrality, but the active pursuit of options that might reform the world by accelerating decolonisation, reducing inequality and expanding space for the self-reliant development of the former colonies. Third World countries that chose to align with the Western bloc turned into Banana Republics or lost out on both democratisation and development and became anaemically dependent on the West.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom