What's new

US Apologizes to Pakistan For Salala Attack

You have to learn to ignore. I am more of neutral kinds, but I was felt that it was not apology.

It's quite clear it is an apology. Maybe you should take a careful look at your command of the English language, as in your words you did say that "I was felt it was not an apology".

And tell me how is US apology bad for us?

Why did you selectively just quote one part of my post? Why don't you hop back a few weeks/months and see what your compatriots were writing (about an apology that will never happen). Your question has also been answered by other Pakistanis on this forum a few posts ago.
 
Apology is to convince people where as its the money offered to leaders that will really help in opening NATO routes :P
 
Text of Clinton statement on Pakistan


AP WASHINGTON — The following is the text of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s statement apologizing to Pakistan for a November NATO airstrike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers and Pakistan re-opening supply lines to Afghanistan that it had closed as a result:


Personal Post .This morning, I spoke by telephone with Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar.

I once again reiterated our deepest regrets for the tragic incident in Salala last November. I offered our sincere condolences to the families of the Pakistani soldiers who lost their lives. Foreign Minister Khar and I acknowledged the mistakes that resulted in the loss of Pakistani military lives. We are sorry for the losses suffered by the Pakistani military. We are committed to working closely with Pakistan and Afghanistan to prevent this from ever happening again.

As I told the former Prime Minister of Pakistan days after the Salala incident, America respects Pakistan’s sovereignty and is committed to working together in pursuit of shared objectives on the basis of mutual interests and mutual respect.

In today’s phone call, Foreign Minister Khar and I talked about the importance of taking coordinated action against terrorists who threaten Pakistan, the United States, and the region; of supporting Afghanistan’s security, stability, and efforts towards reconciliation; and of continuing to work together to advance the many other shared interests we have, from increasing trade and investment to strengthening our people-to-people ties. Our countries should have a relationship that is enduring, strategic, and carefully defined, and that enhances the security and prosperity of both our nations and the region.

The Foreign Minister and I were reminded that our troops — Pakistani and American — are in a fight against a common enemy. We are both sorry for losses suffered by both our countries in this fight against terrorists. We have enhanced our counter-terrorism cooperation against terrorists that threaten Pakistan and the United States, with the goal of defeating Al-Qaida in the region.

In addition, I am pleased that Foreign Minister Khar has informed me that the ground supply lines (GLOC) into Afghanistan are opening. Pakistan will continue not to charge any transit fee in the larger interest of peace and security in Afghanistan and the region. This is a tangible demonstration of Pakistan’s support for a secure, peaceful, and prosperous Afghanistan and our shared objectives in the region. This will also help the United States and ISAF conduct the planned drawdown at a much lower cost. This is critically important to the men and women who are fighting terrorism and extremism in Afghanistan. Foreign Minister Khar has informed me that, consistent with current practice, no lethal equipment will transit the GLOC into Afghanistan except for equipping the ANSF. In concluding the call, I reiterated our deep appreciation to the Government and the people of Pakistan for their many sacrifices and their critical contribution to the ongoing fight against terrorism and extremism.
 
This appology does not mean anything as it will open the same routes which are used to arm and fund terrorist in our own country...a backstab to the nation...we should have planned to close the NATO routes permenantly...can someone draw the analogy between CIA and AL CIAda


NATO chief apologizes, Pakistani Taleban vow revenge
NATO chief apologizes, Pakistani Taleban vow revenge | ArabNews


Angered by repeated attacks by NATO helicopters on militant targets within its borders, Pakistan blocked one of the supply routes for NATO troops in Afghanistan after a strike killed three Pakistani soldiers in the western Kurram region.
“I expressed my regret for the incident last week in which Pakistani soldiers lost their lives,” Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi in Brussels.
“I expressed my hope the border will be open for supplies as soon as possible.”
The apology came after gunmen attacked a convoy of trucks taking goods to Western forces in Afghanistan on the outskirts of the Pakistani capital.
Senior police officer Mirwaiz Niaz said at least a dozen gunmen opened fire on tankers at a depot near Islamabad late on Sunday, killing three guards. They then set fire to 13 vehicles.
Pakistani Taleban militants claimed responsibility.
“We will continue such attacks all over the country to avenge drone attacks and attacks by foreign forces inside Pakistani territory,” Taleban spokesman Azam Tariq told Reuters by telephone from an undisclosed location.
Hours later, suspected militants attacked trawlers carrying supplies for NATO through the southwestern province of Baluchistan, killing one man, police said.
Pakistan has officially said the border has been closed for security reasons and the Taleban threat of more attacks will likely prolong the closure of the vital supply route — now in its fifth day — and further strain ties with ally Washington, which has long demanded Pakistan crack down on militants.
About half of all non-lethal supplies for western forces in land-locked Afghanistan pass through Pakistan, giving Pakistan considerable leverage over the United States, which is scrambling to contain a raging Taleban insurgency in Afghanistan before it starts withdrawing troops in July next year.
“Efforts are underway to resolve this issue, but there is a lot of anger in Pakistan about the border incursion,” a senior Pakistani government official told Reuters.
ISAF spokesman Major Joel Harper told Reuters in Kabul “recent attacks in Pakistan have no immediate impact — less than 1 percent of all trucks and traffic experience any pilferage or damage.”
“That said ... it is an important element of the Pakistani economy, it’s important to our logistics stocks. As attacks take place, NATO has no alternative but to seek other routes into Afghanistan — we are exploring other logistics routes with other countries in the north.”
NATO maintains a northern distribution network through Russia and central Asian republics for about 30 percent of its non-lethal supplies, Harper said.


Despite its anger, Pakistan can’t afford to long antagonise an ally that provides $2 billion in military aid a year — aid vital for Pakistan’s own fight against militants, analysts say.
“There has to be some solution and I think there will be one. But there is an anger and you have to address it,” a Pakistani security official said.
Officials at the US embassy in Islamabad said despite the protests by Pakistan and the closing of the border, cooperation in flood relief missions and security assistance continues.
“Cooperation is continuing on a lot of levels. Contextually, we’re still in a better place than we were two years ago in terms of cooperation,” said a senior embassy official. “From that perspective, we’re working now to address their concerns.”
Rasmussen said the killing of the three Pakistani soldiers was unintended and showed the need to improve coordination between the NATO and the Pakistani military. He said a joint investigation was under way.
“It is important we step up our cooperation,” he said.
That cooperation could be slow in coming, however, because the US CIA has escalated its unacknowledged campaign of pilotless drone strikes against Al-Qaeda-linked militants in Pakistan’s northwest, with 21 attacks in September, the highest number in a single month on record.
Civilian casualties caused by the drone strikes have infuriated many Pakistanis and made it harder for the government to cooperate with the United States.
The strikes preceded warnings by Britain and the United States of an increased risk of terrorist attacks in Europe, with Washington saying Al-Qaeda might target transport infrastructure.
Pakistan is under heavy US pressure to crack down harder on militants in the northwest of the country near the Afghan border, parts of which are described as a global hub for extremists.
(Additional reporting by Chris Allbritton, Faisal Mehmood and Zeeshan Haider in Islamabad, and Saud Mehsud in Dera Ismail Khan; Writing by Chris Allbritton; Editing by Robert Birsel and Sugita Katyal)
 
It's quite clear it is an apology. Maybe you should take a careful look at your command of the English language, as in your words you did say that "I was felt it was not an apology".



Why did you selectively just quote one part of my post? Why don't you hop back a few weeks/months and see what your compatriots were writing (about an apology that will never happen). Your question has also been answered by other Pakistanis on this forum a few posts ago.

I don't want to hop back because I live on earth and not PDF, but it seems that you are shying away from a direct question which is "How is the US apology bad for India"?
 
most news wires except for india (obviously) are using the world 'apology'!!!
 
Good idea, but as usual afghan government will not agree this.
Look the small country Sri Lanka they fought with militant in decades.
Taliban are very evil, very difficult to control Them.
They can destabilize this region for 50 years.

Interview with a Suicide Bomber

They are saying all Muslims should come in Miran Shah

Animals like these should be tortured till they are next to death, then they should be provided treatment and this process should be repeated until their inhumane and impure wishes of death are met!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
most news wires except for india (obviously) are using the world 'apology'!!!
Our or any media has so much competition that they either present worst things in worst ways and good things in best way. They are driven by TRP just like any other country's, to present what soothes the audience more. For POV of general public of India, US "apologizing" to Pakistan, is worst news. You can formulate the rest.

Same happens when situation is opposite if News is about India and Pakistan media is concerned.
 
I don't want to hop back because I live on earth and not PDF, but it seems that you are shying away from a direct question which is "How is the US apology bad for India"?

What you should say is that you are too lazy to search for the answer yourself, secondly I didn't say anything about an apology being bad for India. I just refereed to what your countrymen were saying a few months ago. That should have been quite simple to understand.
 
I am minding my own business buddy. Indians have huge investments in afghanistan too u know. We all want taliban to be kicked out by US and we appreciate all the help that pakistan is providing to help US (therefore us) achieve their goals. Thank you very much for helping us even at your own expense.

And don't you worry, we shall ensure that you get your just rewards with interest once NATO/US depart from Afghanistan.
 
I understood the statements made by Clinton. High level officials doesn't want to say bad silly statements "I kill your daddy, I kill your mommy, I kill your son, so today I kill your soldiers, I apology"

This is formal statements we expected, that's enough they acknowledges their mistakes clearly and misusing against Pakistan. That is how high level diplomatic communicated.
 
And don't you worry, we shall ensure that you get your just rewards with interest once NATO/US depart from Afghanistan.

i'm not sure about having hopes pinned on a two bit government, led by Karzai, whose writ doesn't apply to much of the country.
 
What you should say is that you are too lazy to search for the answer yourself, secondly I didn't say anything about an apology being bad for India. I just refereed to what your countrymen were saying a few months ago. That should have been quite simple to understand.

Lots of people said many things. Even some pakistanis said that the routes should not be opened or that they will be opened in a month. Does that mean all of them are idiots?

You are just jumping around acting like by making US issue an apology pakistan has conquered the world. Hell, even Shahrukh khan got an apology that didn't take seven months. The apology itself is pointless. Its the NATO supply routes that is the only tangible trophy and US has it now.

And don't you worry, we shall ensure that you get your just rewards with interest once NATO/US depart from Afghanistan.

Keep dreaming about the future friend. Btw, its 2012 & not 2014.
 
Keep dreaming about the future friend. Btw, its 2012 & not 2014.

You already missed more then you realize, it's a good thing you are dumb enough to believe that we did not ensure a great deal of say in Afghanistan's future for this transit route.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom