US anti-Iran plan revealed

[regular]

Fundamental teaching of all religions : Do the right thing and dont bother about what others are saying. Victory will be yours.

If Iran is really on the righteous path, this will be a good acid test.

umm....But Iran is doing nothing wrong. Its just following a peaceful path for survivability.....I guess Iran will be fine......

 

[T-Rex]

Assalam alaikum

I don't think there will be any war at all

TARIQ

That's what the Arab sultans and sheikhs think, but if anything these Arab despots are famous for their follies.

 

[tallboy123]

if any war starts who will side with Iran against US,NATO,Israel,UK and saudi's(US puppet force)......???

Pakistan? Iraq? Afghanistan?...Libya? Egypt?? Who ???
Do u think Iran can survive a hour of air battle with their air force?

Pakistan has nukes, probably they may support Iran... just my guess.....put up ur POV people

 

[pak-marine]

if any war starts who will side with Iran against US,NATO,Israel,UK and saudi's(US puppet force)......???

Pakistan? Iraq? Afghanistan?...Libya? Egypt?? Who ???
Do u think Iran can survive a hour of air battle with their air force?

Pakistan has nukes, probably they may support Iran... just my guess.....put up ur POV people

its going to be iran against the rest of the world

 

[Major Shaitan Singh]

One need to understand that Iran has Submarines and that can hit US and Europe mainland.
Iran Air-defence is good it is capable of shooting down low flying aircraft.
To drop Bunker Buster Bomb aircraft has to come down to certain altitude and that time it can get hit.

Isreali and American Satellite are hunting for Iran Sub Location they can get refilled from Cuba and Argentina.
They are detailed studing about destruction and impact on Gulf of Oman which will done by IRG Navy.

Iran has mass produced Mini Submarine

Isreali Public is not much worried about Iran Nukes the Media is worried and Politican are trying to sell it for their vote bank.

 

[OrionHunter]

No chance of WW3,,, but for sure it would be one sided gang bang........

Gang bang? Ooops! You're watching too much ****!! Sheeeesh!

Ok seriously, if Iran's nukes are taken out then be prepared for a massive jump in oil prices as Iran will undoubtedly close the Straits of Hormuz for shipping. Be prepared to shell out Rs 120 to Rs 150 per litre of petrol!

 

[regular]

if any war starts who will side with Iran against US,NATO,Israel,UK and saudi's(US puppet force)......???

Pakistan? Iraq? Afghanistan?...Libya? Egypt?? Who ???
Do u think Iran can survive a hour of air battle with their air force?

Pakistan has nukes, probably they may support Iran... just my guess.....put up ur POV people

I guess U must be kidding with Pakistan....Cuz we can't even save us from the drones so howcome Pakistan is going to side with Iran...Yea! maybe help Iran get beatup like its been beatenup everyday by the drones.....Did our Nukes worked against drones or against US/NATO till now......
Yea! But I guess India is in a position to side with Iran and use its Nukes against US/NATO......

 

[T-Rex]

Israel's self-fulfilling prophecy on Iran
Another round of Middle East confrontation involving Israel may kick-start after the latest IAEA report.
John Bell and John Zada: 10 Nov 2011 12:56


MADRID, SPAIN - With the release of the IAEA's indicting report into Iran's nuclear activities, the starting gun for another round of Middle East confrontation involving Israel has gone off. The report, coming at a time of de-stabilising change across the region, threatens to transform a low-level, proxy conflict between Israel and Iran into a more violent and direct confrontation.

Since the discovery of a secret Iranian nuclear facility at Natanz a decade ago, Israel and the West have engaged in a shadow war against Iran involving implicit threats, muscle flexing, convoluted diplomacy and intelligence intrigues. Reacting to Tehran's bellicose anti-Zionist rhetoric, Israeli politicians have repeatedly said they would not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran. Ever since, the shadow of a military intervention against the Islamic Republic has hung over the world like a dark sceptre.

But so far, Israel has refrained from launching a very risky operation, choosing instead to deter Iran and stymie its ability to produce nuclear weapons. Indeed, the latest smoke signals of war coming from Israel could be part of its strategy to frighten Tehran. But with the IAEA report, and a quickly morphing political situation in the region, it may be that Israel is turning a corner in its resolve to finally act.

The local context has changed considerably for Israel. The Arab spring has shattered all assumptions and threatens decades-old alliances. Symbolic but meaningful gains by the Palestinians at the UN have compounded Israel's sense of powerlessness and uncertainty. As Palestinians gain ground on the world stage and old Arab allies become strangely indecipherable, the more tangible issue of Iran makes for an alluring diversion - and a reassertion of primacy.

Some Arab Sunni leaders are deeply fearful of Iran's regional ambitions, and may be giving quiet nods of approval to a strike that would hobble the Shia giant across the Gulf - even from Israel. Moreover, Israel may act while the United States is still in Iraq. An Iranian retaliation against American targets there could draw a reluctant USA indirectly into war - a salient Israeli objective.

Despite these calculations, an attack on Iran will come at terrible cost of lives and destruction on both sides. Those who claim Iran is a paper tiger will not be in the direct line of fire in Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and Israel. The damage will not just be material. The positive spirit of the Arab revolutions, focused on practical not ideological goals, will be swept away in the aftershocks. Indeed, any future Iranian anti-regime protest movement will be trumped by national anger against the attack.

The great irony is that this will be a self-fulfilling prophecy: instead of pre-emption and prevention, the attack will ensure decades of Iranian search for a nuclear option aimed at attacking Israel. In other words, Israel will have traded the mere possibility of an attack for its certainty.

Most damaging of all, this war will mean yet another turn of the cycles of violence in the Middle East. The strike, another trauma forged more deeply into Middle Eastern memory, will provide another reason for Arabs to hate Israel. Today's nods of support will rapidly turn into recriminations as Arab leaders will be forced to respond to their newly empowered publics demands for justice against Israeli aggression - and the killing of Muslims.

There is another way forward for the region, away from more trauma. It begins, but does not end, with the creation of a Palestinian state. The formative trauma between Israel and the Arabs was in Palestine in 1948. Its resolution will not dissolve all the problems with Iran, but it will cut off anti-Israeli sentiments at the pass, and point to fresh and healthy ground.

Many Israelis shirk at any link between the Palestine issue and Iran. But, the Middle East is much more of an inter-related and dynamic organism that many in the West or Israel care to perceive. History and dignity count much more than some care to admit.

This tough decision to go to fresh ground is unappealing to politicians. Instead, reassertion of control amidst shocking change, and misperceptions from the past threaten to rule the day. We saw it happen after 9/11 in Iraq, and the current events may well mean war, and decades of healing unnecessary - and possibly fatal - wounds.

 

[tallboy123]

I guess U must be kidding with Pakistan....Cuz we can't even save us from the drones so howcome Pakistan is going to side with Iran...Yea! maybe help Iran get beatup like its been beatenup everyday by the drones.....Did our Nukes worked against drones or against US/NATO till now......
Yea! But I guess India is in a position to side with Iran and use its Nukes against US/NATO......

are u kidding??Iran is technologically far ahead of india...

India will just sit back and watch iranian's test their new systems against F-22's and EF and Rafale's.....
And india will receive the report about the performance of EF and Rafale which will be helpful to select the winner..as this will be the second test ground for EF and Rafale
If not nuke armed pakistan side with Iran then who??? will only God come to Iran's rescue??

 

[tallboy123]

One need to understand that Iran has Submarines and that can hit US and Europe mainland.
Iran Air-defence is good it is capable of shooting down low flying aircraft.
To drop Bunker Buster Bomb aircraft has to come down to certain altitude and that time it can get hit.

Isreali and American Satellite are hunting for Iran Sub Location they can get refilled from Cuba and Argentina.
They are detailed studing about destruction and impact on Gulf of Oman which will done by IRG Navy.

Iran has mass produced Mini Submarine

Isreali Public is not much worried about Iran Nukes the Media is worried and Politican are trying to sell it for their vote bank.

how much capable are these mini submarines against the nuke power attack US submarines and the P3 Orions???

 

[T-Rex]

If not nuke armed pakistan side with Iran then who??? will only God come to Iran's rescue??

Last time when the yanks tried to free their comrades immediately after the revolution didn't God rescue Iran?

 

[tallboy123]

Last time when the yanks tried to free their comrades immediately after the revolution didn't God rescue Iran?

Well, i wish God will this time to save Iran from F-22 and EF and rafales and some F-16's of Israeli airforce.......

 

[TARIQ BN ZIYAAD]

Israel's self-fulfilling prophecy on Iran
Another round of Middle East confrontation involving Israel may kick-start after the latest IAEA report.
John Bell and John Zada: 10 Nov 2011 12:56


MADRID, SPAIN - With the release of the IAEA's indicting report into Iran's nuclear activities, the starting gun for another round of Middle East confrontation involving Israel has gone off. The report, coming at a time of de-stabilising change across the region, threatens to transform a low-level, proxy conflict between Israel and Iran into a more violent and direct confrontation.

Since the discovery of a secret Iranian nuclear facility at Natanz a decade ago, Israel and the West have engaged in a shadow war against Iran involving implicit threats, muscle flexing, convoluted diplomacy and intelligence intrigues. Reacting to Tehran's bellicose anti-Zionist rhetoric, Israeli politicians have repeatedly said they would not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran. Ever since, the shadow of a military intervention against the Islamic Republic has hung over the world like a dark sceptre.

But so far, Israel has refrained from launching a very risky operation, choosing instead to deter Iran and stymie its ability to produce nuclear weapons. Indeed, the latest smoke signals of war coming from Israel could be part of its strategy to frighten Tehran. But with the IAEA report, and a quickly morphing political situation in the region, it may be that Israel is turning a corner in its resolve to finally act.

The local context has changed considerably for Israel. The Arab spring has shattered all assumptions and threatens decades-old alliances. Symbolic but meaningful gains by the Palestinians at the UN have compounded Israel's sense of powerlessness and uncertainty. As Palestinians gain ground on the world stage and old Arab allies become strangely indecipherable, the more tangible issue of Iran makes for an alluring diversion - and a reassertion of primacy.

Some Arab Sunni leaders are deeply fearful of Iran's regional ambitions, and may be giving quiet nods of approval to a strike that would hobble the Shia giant across the Gulf - even from Israel. Moreover, Israel may act while the United States is still in Iraq. An Iranian retaliation against American targets there could draw a reluctant USA indirectly into war - a salient Israeli objective.

Despite these calculations, an attack on Iran will come at terrible cost of lives and destruction on both sides. Those who claim Iran is a paper tiger will not be in the direct line of fire in Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and Israel. The damage will not just be material. The positive spirit of the Arab revolutions, focused on practical not ideological goals, will be swept away in the aftershocks. Indeed, any future Iranian anti-regime protest movement will be trumped by national anger against the attack.

The great irony is that this will be a self-fulfilling prophecy: instead of pre-emption and prevention, the attack will ensure decades of Iranian search for a nuclear option aimed at attacking Israel. In other words, Israel will have traded the mere possibility of an attack for its certainty.

Most damaging of all, this war will mean yet another turn of the cycles of violence in the Middle East. The strike, another trauma forged more deeply into Middle Eastern memory, will provide another reason for Arabs to hate Israel. Today's nods of support will rapidly turn into recriminations as Arab leaders will be forced to respond to their newly empowered publics demands for justice against Israeli aggression - and the killing of Muslims.

There is another way forward for the region, away from more trauma. It begins, but does not end, with the creation of a Palestinian state. The formative trauma between Israel and the Arabs was in Palestine in 1948. Its resolution will not dissolve all the problems with Iran, but it will cut off anti-Israeli sentiments at the pass, and point to fresh and healthy ground.

Many Israelis shirk at any link between the Palestine issue and Iran. But, the Middle East is much more of an inter-related and dynamic organism that many in the West or Israel care to perceive. History and dignity count much more than some care to admit.

This tough decision to go to fresh ground is unappealing to politicians. Instead, reassertion of control amidst shocking change, and misperceptions from the past threaten to rule the day. We saw it happen after 9/11 in Iraq, and the current events may well mean war, and decades of healing unnecessary - and possibly fatal - wounds.

With respect to these experts they don't a know a thing, arab fought and muslims fought for palestine coz they believe it has our 1st qibla , iranians don't believe in that why they will fightf?

TARIQ

 

[T-Rex]

With respect to these experts they don't a know a thing, arab fought and muslims fought for palestine coz they believe it has our 1st qibla , iranians don't believe in that why they will fightf?

TARIQ

Which Muslims are fighting for your 1st qibla? The Saudis? The Kuwaitis? The Jordanians? None of them are fighting for your 1st qibla, they have always been too busy usurping the powers of the state and that's the fact. Matter of fact, the rulers of those so-called Muslim states are secretly aiding israel in its aggression in the region. So, if Iran fights for your 1st qibla what are going to do?

 

[agentny17]

Which Muslims are fighting for your 1st qibla? The Saudis? The Kuwaitis? The Jordanians? None of them are fighting for your 1st qibla, they have always been too busy usurping the powers of the state and that's the fact. Matter of fact, the rulers of those so-called Muslim states are secretly aiding israel in its aggression in the region. So, if Iran fights for your 1st qibla what are going to do?

We did , but failed :-(. Atleast we tried thu. Only Syria can say that they did the same, with all the respect to all the Muslim countries. Egyptian economy and society is still affected by those wars till now.