US anti-Iran plan revealed

[T-Rex]

If you want wars...... so you'll have it... But sadly you can't defeat Israel... They are more dedicated to their cause than you people.

Since when did the nazis become zionists?

 

[Heinz89]

Since when did the nazis become zionists?

Since morons become super morons.......... just don't babble and answer my questions!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[T-Rex]

Since morons become super morons.......... just don't babble and answer my questions!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nazis and zionists are the greatest morons of all!

 

[drunken-monke]

I guess U must be kidding with Pakistan....Cuz we can't even save us from the drones so howcome Pakistan is going to side with Iran...Yea! maybe help Iran get beatup like its been beatenup everyday by the drones.....Did our Nukes worked against drones or against US/NATO till now......
Yea! But I guess India is in a position to side with Iran and use its Nukes against US/NATO......

Now this is a trolling gor sure..

Remember, when Pakistan was feeling American Military action in the past few months, Jn. Kiyani warned that they are a nuclear armed nation. The threat is enough than action itself.

Imagin a Iranian SUb, armed with nuclear warhead reach near American Mainland or EU mainland, if they at all attack, it would be havock....

The perception of threat is more useful than threat itself

 

[Al Bhatti]

Wrong post

 

[Chogy]

Imagin a Iranian SUb, armed with nuclear warhead reach near American Mainland or EU mainland, if they at all attack, it would be havock....

Iran is struggling just to field land-based IRBM's with conventional warheads. A nuclear submarine with nuclear weapons is a faint and distant dream. That's like saying "When North Korea launches their nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, equipped with Su-35 and tactical nuclear warheads, WATCH OUT."

I have a lot of respect for Iranian culture. I think Iranians in general have enormous potential, if they could get out from under the Khamenei thumb. Their recent "green" movement which was brutally suppressed after the last stolen presidential election speaks volumes about their desire for reform and democracy.

 

[poseidon]

Iran can only threaten the usa by its unconventional warfare, but as i said many times and the fellow above me said, we are not at war with their great persian people, we are war with their mullas,ayatollahs...

 

[Arian]

Iran is struggling just to field land-based IRBM's with conventional warheads. A nuclear submarine with nuclear weapons is a faint and distant dream. That's like saying "When North Korea launches their nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, equipped with Su-35 and tactical nuclear warheads, WATCH OUT."

I have a lot of respect for Iranian culture. I think Iranians in general have enormous potential, if they could get out from under the Khamenei thumb. Their recent "green" movement which was brutally suppressed after the last stolen presidential election speaks volumes about their desire for reform and democracy.

But you also can't deny Iran's capability to produce chemical/biological stockpile if it feels the need. Iran had a large stockpile of chemical weapons that it destroyed them as a moral gesture. If you believe only uncoventional warheads are good for Iran in case of a war, then Iran can produce chemical and biological weapons, also it can produce hundreds of white phosphorous warheads as well. (maybe we should include dirty bombs too?)

Iran can only threaten the usa by its unconventional warfare, but as i said many times and the fellow above me said, we are not at war with their great persian people, we are war with their mullas,ayatollahs...

That doesn't make sense to me at all. If our countries go into a war, you can't distinguish between great Iranian people and the Mullahs. War is war, and if someone attack us, we'll defend our nation unitedly, no matter what kind of lunatics are running the country.

 

[poseidon]

But you also can't deny Iran's capability to produce chemical/biological stockpile if it feels the need. Iran had a large stockpile of chemical weapons that it destroyed them as a moral gesture.



That doesn't make sense to me at all. If our countries go into a war, you can't distinguish between great Iranian people and the Mullahs. War is war, and if someone attack us, we'll defend our nation unitedly, no matter what kind of lunatics are running the country.

My friend, i would pray that not a single innocent Iranian life gets lost. But just think for a second how great you country would be if you were not under these rulers? Your country was one of the most respected countries on the planet in the 70s...but now look at you. You need to go back to your ancient roots and denounce islam. All the Iranian i have met here in us wether they were my student or just random, none of them liked the idea of islam on their country.

If war starts the Iranian people should not back the regime, you should let them fall. even among the basij, there are many men,womens who are against your current regime, but why they are serving them i have no idea.

 

[Arian]

My friend, i would pray that not a single innocent Iranian life gets lost. But just think for a second how great you country would be if you were not under these rulers? Your country was one of the most respected countries on the planet in the 70s...but now look at you. You need to go back to your ancient roots and denounce islam. All the Iranian i have met here in us wether they were my student or just random, none of them liked the idea of islam on their country.

If war starts the Iranian people should not back the regime, you should let them fall. even among the basij, there are many men,womens who are against your current regime, but why they are serving them i have no idea.

I'm personally an atheist, but I don't believe denouncing Islam is a sign of progression. That's just religious intolerance, nothing more. Although I consider all Abrahamic religions as problematic for the world's peace, because they have outdated religious laws, I believe that the followers of these religions have all rights to practice their religions and beliefs and that's their undeniable right. just like it's my undeniable right to be agnostic.

Actually that's far from the reality. Iranians are a patriotic and nationalistic people. some Iranians are even ultra-nationalists if you ask me. not only they won't let the regime fall, they'll support the regime at any cost. just ask Iranians on this forum. many of the Iranians on this forum are irreligious, but still they support Iran against aggressive countries.

 

[poseidon]

I'm personally an atheist, but I don't believe denouncing Islam is a sign of progression. That's just religious intolerance, nothing more. Although I consider all Abrahamic religions as problematic for the world's peace, because they have outdated religious laws, I believe that the followers of these religions have all rights to practice their religions and beliefs and that's their undeniable right. just like it's my undeniable right to be agnostic.

Actually that's far from the reality. Iranians are a patriotic and nationalistic people. some Iranians are even ultra-nationalists if you ask me. not only they won't let the regime fall, they'll support the regime at any cost. just ask Iranians on this forum. many of the Iranians on this forum are irreligious, but still they support Iran against aggressive countries.

You need to note that the Iranian atheist and so on will defend the Iranian land from the outsiders because of their love for your land, BUT they dont say they are doing it because they like the Iranian regime. they do it because as you say they see it as a honour of sort to defend their land. but anyway i am not saying Islam itself is a problem, its the fact that Iranian leader and saudis and so on, use it as a excuse to cause devision between themselves and their people.

I will pray for your people, but a change will hopfully come from the Iranians people inside Iran like the 70s, i think usa needs to respect that if the Iranian people are really fed up that much with their regim, then they will protest their a$$es off.

 

[Arian]

You need to note that the Iranian atheist and so on will defend the Iranian land from the outsiders because of their love for your land, BUT they dont say they are doing it because they like the Iranian regime. they do it because as you say they see it as a honour of sort to defend their land. but anyway i am not saying Islam itself is a problem, its the fact that Iranian leader and saudis and so on, use it as a excuse to cause devision between themselves and their people.

I will pray for your people, but a change will hopfully come from the Iranians people inside Iran like the 70s, i think usa needs to respect that if the Iranian people are really fed up that much with their regim, then they will protest their a$$es off.

Indeed. They'll defend the Iranian land for the sake of the love for Iran, not because they are in favor of the regime's behavior and actions. Your country defends the Saudi interests and arms them to the teeth, even though they are a repressive regime which is hundred times more brutal than the Iranian regime. don't you see any double standards here?

You can't expect a country to have more than 3 revolutions in a century. Actually if it wasn't for the ill-intentions of global powers seeking dominance in our region, the Persian constitutional revolution in 1906 had successfully established a democratic constitutional monarchy in Iran. But unfortunately it was ruined by Russia and Britain at that time. Also, Had the USA rejected the British request to back a coup against Iran's democratically elected prime minister, Dr. Mossaddegh, Iran would've never morphed into a dictatorship under the Shah. so I prefer that American people only pray for us and understand that the situation of the people inside Iran is none of their business, and they should know that we'll respect the USA more than now in that case, although even now the majority of Iranians respect the USA.

 

[poseidon]

Indeed. They'll defend the Iranian land for the sake of the love for Iran, not because they are in favor of the regime's behavior and actions. Your country defends the Saudi interests and arms them to the teeth, even though they are a repressive regime which is hundred times more brutal than the Iranian regime. don't you see any double standards here?

You can't expect a country to have more than 3 revolutions in a century. Actually if it wasn't for the ill-intentions of global powers seeking dominance in our region, the Persian constitutional revolution in 1906 had successfully established a democratic constitutional monarchy in Iran. but surely it was ruined by Russia and Britain at that time. Also, If It wasn't for the CIA backed coup 'operation Ajax' Dr. Mossaddegh who was a democratically elected prime minister of Iran hadn't been ousted. so I prefer that American people only pray for us and understand that the situation of the people inside Iran is none of their business, and they should know we'll respect the USA more than now in that case, although even now the majority of Iranians respect the USA.

Our 1% needs to replaced by the 99%, the american government is not the american people, most of us are against a military action. The british always poke their noses where it does not belong and one day they will have that nose bitten off.
I have faith in your people and will love to see you one day free.

 

[Al Bhatti]

15 Nov 2011

Saudi Prince Rebuffs Talk of Strike on Iran

Saudi Arabia's former intelligence chief said Nov. 15 his country opposes any military strike on Iran, amid rising tensions over the Islamic republic's nuclear program.

"Such an act, I think, would be foolish. And to undertake it ... would be tragic," said Prince Turki al-Faisal, his country's former intelligence chief and a former ambassador to Washington, speaking at a National Press Club briefing.

A military strike would rally Iranians around their government, the prince argued.

"If anything, [a potential military strike] would only make the Iranians more determined" to develop nuclear weapons, he added.

Israel in recent weeks has warned Tehran of possible military strikes against its nuclear sites, and fears of such an attack have increased following the release last week of a U.N. nuclear watchdog report accusing Tehran of working to develop nuclear warheads to fit inside its medium-range missiles.

Iran has long rejected western and Israeli allegations that its nuclear program is geared toward military objectives, saying its activities are solely civilian.

And tensions have risen between Iran and Saudi Arabia in recent weeks, since U.S. allegations surfaced that Iranian officials plotted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington.

Tehran has denied the accusations, but Riyadh has taken them seriously and said it was weighing "a suitable response."

Saudi Prince Rebuffs Talk of Strike on Iran - Defense News

 

[T-Rex]

Iran is struggling just to field land-based IRBM's with conventional warheads. A nuclear submarine with nuclear weapons is a faint and distant dream. That's like saying "When North Korea launches their nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, equipped with Su-35 and tactical nuclear warheads, WATCH OUT."

I have a lot of respect for Iranian culture. I think Iranians in general have enormous potential, if they could get out from under the Khamenei thumb. Their recent "green" movement which was brutally suppressed after the last stolen presidential election speaks volumes about their desire for reform and democracy.

Well, the truth is out; Iran was never a threat to the west, it's all lies hatched by israel and uncle sam.