How about his mob vs other’s mob?When you say in person!- He versus a Mob I suppose- Which is the new normal in todays India!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about his mob vs other’s mob?When you say in person!- He versus a Mob I suppose- Which is the new normal in todays India!
What about it!How about his mob vs other’s mob?
Need to start somewhere. Why not 30-A? Just because Muslims will not like it?No- Hows that for an answer- Put the whole proposal in front not just Art-30 A- The whole system needs a revamp.
What is wrong with that?
It is the basis of evolution "Survival of the fittest"
It is the basis of diplomacy (UNSC permanent seats given to victors of WW2)
It is the key to winning wars
Yeah safoora too Thought something similar when she was shouting those slogans. Unfortunately only things burning there was her loins.All FIRES usually start from an echo chamber. When I say I can burn India to the ground, it's not an empty threat
No so that Muslims feel that they are also included- If you are not aware of inclusiveness, please go ahead and educate yourself. For any proposal to succeed, first and foremost you need to include all the stakeholders, do that first and then decide inclusively what Article should be addressed first- Its that simple.Need to start somewhere. Why not 30-A? Just because Muslims will not like it?
What is wrong with that?
It is the basis of evolution "Survival of the fittest"
It is the basis of diplomacy (UNSC permanent seats given to victors of WW2)
It is the key to winning wars
So now you are claiming to know more than constitution framers. I have given you the account on constituent assembly discussion. They were only accommodative to other religions. They never meant for these religions to hijack the constitution. Today everyone seems to think that India was always secular. No it was not. It's only when Sangh was getting popular among the Hindus, the Congress played the secular card. But that didn't help as they lost power in 1977 itself to Sangh. You cannot revision the history to suit your needs.So what-The word socialist was added to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd amendment act of 1976 as well- Whats your point!- Dont want to call India a Secular Nation in true meaning, then go for an Amendment and make it a Hindu Rashtra or "Secular within the Hindu definition"- By the way this is what Congress did- India's secularism does not separate religion and state- There lies the problem-Should have been seperate State and religion and we would not be having this discussion today- So yes Sang did give the congress a tough time to add- "not to separate religion and state"- - Its time to evolve and fix the mistakes of the past.
Sure. You are like a shit to us. So there.You all are like little cockroaches to me.
They lost power due to Indra Gandhi and Emergency- not because of Sang!- So what happened after that were Sangh able to re capture power and how long did it take after the so called reason.But that didn't help as they lost power in 1977 itself to Sangh. You cannot revision the history to suit your needs.
Sure. You are like a shit to us. So there.
Everyone in the world knows that Indian cockroaches are obsessed with shitting due to a lack of toilets in the country.
shitty come back from the shit. Try again.Everyone in the world knows that Indian cockroaches are obsessed with shitting due to a lack of toilets in the country.
Excuse me!- You were the one who posted the 1976 amendment- I just posted the same as well- I did not see the reason why you did that so I just showed you that it does not matter when the term Secular was added- It was added, thats how you evolve.- India was formed and rejected TNT- To better define that and make that constitunal amendment it was added later. Are you telling me that India was formed on the basis of Hindu rashtra before 1976?So now you are claiming to know more than constitution framers. I have given you the account on constituent assembly discussion. They were only accommodative to other religions. They never meant for these religions to hijack the constitution. Today everyone seems to think that India was always secular. No it was not.
shitty come back from the shit. Try again.
They are all interconnected. Don't ascribe everything to one reason.They lost power due to Indra Gandhi and Emergency- not because of Sang!- So what happened after that were Sangh able to re capture power and how long did it take after the so called reason.
Lol. I pity the developed country which has to bear you. I, who live in India have enough degrees from those developed countries and make as much that I could put you to employment in my household. I suggest you to tone down moron.All right, amoeba. Someone from a developed country just gave you 30 minutes of his valuable time. Consider yourself with very fortunate. Bade logoo say bat karke fayda pahonchta hai, I hope that fayda reaches you as well.
An unemployed Indian like you is a burden to everyone. Now go play in the traffic, I am dismissing you rightaway.