Unless Kashmir issue is solved, Mumbai-like attacks always a possibility

[ajtr]

Not really. He was just giving friendly advice that the motivation to keep attacking India would always exist among Kashmiri separatists. Resolve Kashmir and end it. Actually if you listen to this statement the tone, the context was there, but you know its a continuation of subverting Imran's message just to make him look bad.

Take this as a positive that he understands that there is a pressing danger for India and would try to curtail these dangers from India as opposed to a guy who doesn't think that Mumbai like attacks are a possibility still.

Such motivational advice are also called as blackmail.But one thing is clear how har they try to potray imran as liberal none gonna get serious about him even pakistani s call him taliban khan for indians it will be too hard to digest.

 

[Iggy]

Such motivational advice are also called as blackmail.But one thing is clear how har they try to potray imran as liberal none gonna get serious about him even pakistani s call him taliban khan for indians it will be too hard to digest.

Well he is liberal, good for us. If he is Talibani, better for us.. Its not that hard to digest.. Its a win-win situation for us if he is elected..

 

[Wickerman]

Such motivational advice are also called as blackmail.But one thing is clear how har they try to potray imran as liberal none gonna get serious about him even pakistani s call him taliban khan for indians it will be too hard to digest.

If he is actually Taliban Khan and not a liberal, then its good for India.

Pakistan will go down the drain, get destabilized. India will have more and more ammo to pursue denuclearization of Pakistan through political posturing and pressure.

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

That is why rafale and su-30mkis are coming with precision guided munitions khansaab.

 

[Bang Galore]

Not really. He was just giving friendly advice that the motivation to keep attacking India would always exist among Kashmiri separatists.

Hafeez Saeed a Kashmiri? Ajmal Kasab a Kashmiri? Or are Kashmiri separatists so down that others have taken over? Nobody has died & nominated Imran Khan to speak for the Kashmiris. He speaks for his interest & we recognise that.

Wherever there is oppression of people and their land is occupied forcefully,where thousands have already been killed and more so going daily,there will be reaction and there will be revenge....Mumbai attacks were similar reaction from Indian mujahideen....

If it was an attack from "Indian Mujahideen"....why on earth should we speak to Pakistan on Kashmir?

 

[Iggy]

[/B]

If it was an attack from "Indian Mujahideen"....why on earth should we speak to Pakistan on Kashmir?

Dont think that it will end with Indian Mujahideen.. Lot of parties will come in to play soon.. I am even expecting a Christian organisation behind the Mumbai attacks

 

[timetravel]

if kashmir is resolved, pakistan will cause terror in othr regions for some other fabricated reason like kashmir.
so inida should keep kashmir alive unless its resolved in indias favor

right.. this terror will continue till India is finished, and Pakistan is the regional power of south asia. This is because of the ideology of Pakistan, that they are more superior owing to their culture and religious similarity. India being ahead is totally ironical for them and unacceptable. Give Kashmir, give Punjab and then the states to the south would be terrorised by the terrorists on a daily basis and more of bomb blasts in all remaining Indian cities.

Not really. He was just giving friendly advice that the motivation to keep attacking India would always exist among Kashmiri separatists. Resolve Kashmir and end it. Actually if you listen to this statement the tone, the context was there, but you know its a continuation of subverting Imran's message just to make him look bad.

Take this as a positive that he understands that there is a pressing danger for India and would try to curtail these dangers from India as opposed to a guy who doesn't think that Mumbai like attacks are a possibility still.

So it is a blackmail. Also it is Pakistan's responsibility to provide ZERO support to such elements in its country. If Pakistan is serious about that then there is no way such attacks could happen.

It is a blackmail. What is Kashmir is given, and then tomorrow terrorists find some other reason to attack India still? Then we follow their those demands also or else they will continue to do terrorist attacks?

So unless India gives Kashmir there will be terrorist attacks. After giving Kashmir Next statement will be, unless India gives or does this or because India did this so there are terrorist attacks.

There is no dearth of reasons to justify terrorist attacks in India. Give Kashmir, then they will say we will attack because of Ayodhya, then next reason will be moral support to Sikhs in Khalistan, then next reason will be Gujarat. Next reason will be some thing else. So terrorist attacks wont stop no matter what happens to Kashmir.

Why there are terrorist attacks in Pakistan? Who is being oppressed there for whose freedom the terrorists are attacking?

Wherever there is oppression of people and their land is occupied forcefully,where thousands have already been killed and more so going daily,there will be reaction and there will be revenge....Mumbai attacks were similar reaction from Indian mujahideen....

same question to you,
Why there are terrorist attacks in Pakistan? Who is being oppressed there for whose freedom the terrorists are attacking?

Why did terrorists attack USA? Why did terrorists attack UK? and other parts of world.

It takes 2 minutes to find a reason to launch terrorist movement by people who want to do terrorism. The only way to stop terrorists is state's control on them. Only way terrorists can thrive is if Pakistan govt allows them to, otherwise they have no chance of any activities..

Now if Pakistan says terrorist attacks can happen, that means that they are saying that they will not control their activities, so this translates into blackmail that give Kashmir or face attacks. This is not acceptable and this is like waging covert war against India to fulfill political objectives.

 

[airmarshal]

Such motivational advice are also called as blackmail.But one thing is clear how har they try to potray imran as liberal none gonna get serious about him even pakistani s call him taliban khan for indians it will be too hard to digest.

No leader can ever give away on Kashmir. This is a fact. Digest it or not. Musharraf tried his best to give you many solutions. It was your loss you did not accept any of them. Internally, Pakistan position has also hardened.

So Pakistanis if they elect 'Taliban' Khan or 'Liberal' Khan, it will be the same. No giving up on Kashmir.

 

[Paan Singh]

No leader can ever give away on Kashmir. This is a fact. Digest it or not. Musharraf tried his best to give you many solutions. It was your loss you did not accept any of them. Internally, Pakistan position has also hardened.

So Pakistanis if they elect 'Taliban' Khan or 'Liberal' Khan, it will be the same. No giving up on Kashmir.

Unfortunately,In back end pakistani leaders accept that they cant convince india even they can keep shouting but they are afraid of public.Even your army despite of being out of siachin says about the withdrawal of both nations from siachin but they are not on siachin.

so its lip service which u have habit to listen from your leaders.

 

[rockstarIN]

No leader can ever give away on Kashmir. This is a fact. Digest it or not. Musharraf tried his best to give you many solutions. It was your loss you did not accept any of them. Internally, Pakistan position has also hardened.

So Pakistanis if they elect 'Taliban' Khan or 'Liberal' Khan, it will be the same. No giving up on Kashmir.

We want you to stick on and pay the higher price for just holding for such position.

 

[Hobo1]

Im the Dim should also remember if there is possibility Mumbai-like thing, then there also possibility of 71 like thing. India's brand new Mig29Ks would love to better the record of Indian missile boats at Karachi Harbor.

 

[Bang Galore]

No leader can ever give away on Kashmir. This is a fact. Digest it or not. Musharraf tried his best to give you many solutions. It was your loss you did not accept any of them. Internally, Pakistan position has also hardened.

So Pakistanis if they elect 'Taliban' Khan or 'Liberal' Khan, it will be the same. No giving up on Kashmir.

How is it our loss? We still have what we want. Nobody gives a damn what you chaps hope for, doesn't matter what your "leaders" can't give, you can harden your positions as much as you like....it simply makes no difference to us. You hold cards that are weak & are getting weaker, any solution to Kashmir will be on our terms. If not, no issue; we are fine with the status quo.

 

[Hobo1]

Son Of Taliban wouldn't be bad name for IM.

 

[Rig Vedic]

Im the Dim should also remember if there is possibility Mumbai-like thing, then there also possibility of 71 like thing. India's brand new Mig29Ks would love to better the record of Indian missile boats at Karachi Harbor.

This is a wrong attitude.

Obviously India will have to go on building capabilities in many dimensions.

However, rather than any overt war, the danger is that extremism will damage Pakistani society from inside.

 

[Arav_Rana]

Gurgaon: Pakistani cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan on Wednesday said time was up for trying to solve India-Pakistan issues through "militancy and militarily" but asserted that unless Kashmir issue was resolved, there was "always a possibility" of Mumbai-like attacks. Khan, chief of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, also said if his party comes to power, he will not allow terrorism against India to originate from his country's soil.
Addressing a World Economic Forum meeting, he said while improvement in bilateral trade was welcome, the issue of Jammu and Kashmir must also progress on a parallel line. Terming a solution to the Kashmir issue as "vital", he said "trade, connections, along with cricket matches will help. At the same time, we should develop some sort of a roadmap to resolve Kashmir issue, which is vital".
"Because unless we operate on both plains, there is always a possibility, as it happened, relationships were improving, confidence building measures, cricket matches, people-to-people contacts, and then came Mumbai." Stressing the need for a "new relationship", he said "no more trying to resolve our problems through militancy and military but through politics. It should be two-pronged. One to normalise, open up relationships with trade on one side and then start a dialogue on Kashmir."

He also noted that his party has three former Pakistani Foreign Ministers who have told him that they had "come pretty close to resolving" the Kashmir issue. He said lack of trust was a basic problem in Indo-Pak relations which got worse after Mumbai attacks and added that efforts should be made to increase the trust factor.
"We need to have a new relationship. The moment we form the government, we will be able to control militancy and terrorism in our country. Only a strong government can say that 'look we take responsibility for what happens from our soil', whether it is with India or whether it is with the US," Khan said.

and he made this statement while addressing World Economic Forum meeting.
One side these people can not talk about economic only in World Economic Forum meeting, and on other side they cry that we should keep away cricket, n rest sh!t from politics.

Whatever indirectly he is saying does not matter which party comes in pakistan, we ll never stop terrorism from our soul and same time we ll not accept that we are responsible.

BTW he is sick or what ? He is like rahul gandhi, becz whenever rahul opens his mouth, he acts like joker.