What's new

Unironically: Could declaring Sharia Law in Pakistan solve it's insurgency problem?

If you do implement sharia law, that would nullify the reason for the existence of religion based parties and organizations. Their main demand is sharia as their single point manifesto.
Therfore there would be no justification for Jui/JI/TLP/TTP. They can therefore be banned and dismantled as can any religion based parties, and if they don’t comply declare them as fitna/Munafiq etc.. and wipe them out under sharia law.
Cut 50% defence budget and allocate 25% of it towards nationalizing madrassas, and education in general. no private madrassas allowed, no source of brainwashed cannon fodder for terrorists..
50% might be too much, but yes some cutting down would help.

And formal education is very important for scientific and research advancement, we don't want to fall behind the rest of the world, our goal should be to lead.

Honestly to me I see a meritocratic system of governance under Sharia Law as something that could bring stability.

But I'm open to hear the opposing opinion. Because there's probably many things wrong with this idea.
 
.
Islam is a play-thing which is abused to satisfy the egos of Pakistani people - especially the mullahs.

Shariah in Pakistan would be as Islamic as the "Islamic Republic" is Islamic.

There is no sincerity towards Islam by a significant minority - if not a majority.
 
.
Islam is basically quite liberal system

The theocracy in some Muslim countries is similar like Ancient Christian where Church is so powerful.

While in Islam we have this

Dl_aD6DU8AEv6Kv.jpg


They have taken their rabbis and monks as well as the Messiah, son of Mary, as lords besides Allah,1 even though they were commanded to worship none but One God. There is no god ˹worthy of worship˺ except Him. Glorified is He above what they associate ˹with Him˺!

 
. . .
"They" have power to financially choke a nation, to coerce it in various ways due to their leverage of critical technologies and trade.
Unironically, "They" were not supposed to have the power to "choke a nation, to coerce in in various ways due to Pakistan's leverage of nukes".
 
.
Exactly.

Proportionally speaking, most Muslims would agree with instituting the same quality of Islam as Rasul'Allah (SAW) and the Sahaba (RA) did. Note, it wasn't all dandy during the Khilafah Rashidun (e.g., assassinations, civil war, etc). However, we're human, not angels. Even with their flaws, the Sahaba (RA) did a good job expanding the state, building a professional army, building a navy, and integrating diverse populations.

Good leaders will kill good leaders (e.g., the first Muslim civil wars), but they will never kill their country. However, in Pakistan, we're dealing with leaders who will kill their opponents and take the country down. 1971 is a textbook example.

Nope, you cannot justify that. That kill this and kill that is not Islamic.

---------------------

The Battle of the Camel, also known as the Battle of Jamel or the Battle of Basra, took place outside of Basra, Iraq, in 36 AH (656 CE). The battle was fought between the army of the fourth caliph Ali (r. 656–661), on one side, and the rebel army led by Aisha, Talha and Zubayr, on the other side. Ali was the cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, while Aisha was a widow of Muhammad, of whom Talha and Zubayr were both prominent companions. Ali emerged victorious from the battle, Talha and Zubayr were both killed, and Aisha was sent back to Hejaz afterward. The triumvirate had revolted against Ali ostensibly to avenge the assassination of the third caliph Uthman (r. 644–656), although Aisha and Talha are both known to have actively opposed him. The three also called for the removal of Ali from office and for a Qurayshite council (shura) with Talha and Zubayr to appoint his successor.


----------------------------------------------

If there is differences within Muslim people then non violence way should be the solution, not through war like what we see with first Muslim civil war, or other example is Taliban way when they dont agree with former Afghan government.

Other example are

ISIS dont agree with Taliban version of Islam and they make a war against Taliban

TTP doesnt aggree with Pakistan government and they wag war against Pakistan government

ETC, ETC, ETC SIMILAR THINKING

Killing another Muslim will get huge Punishment

Quran-4vs93_muslimhowto.png


The solution for differences should be solved in peaceful way and Democracy is one of them

surah-ash-shuraa-ayat-38.png
 
Last edited:
.
Sounds like you feel eventually one day there will be an Islamist coup

In Canada, where he is? Or UK where you are? That alone tells us all much about your lip servicing hot air. :D
 
. .
No, in Pakistan, which this defence forum is orientated around :yahoo:

LOL. Obviously you want Pakistanis to live in the 13th century while you enjoy life in the 21st century where you are. Hypocrite! :D
 
.
LOL. Obviously you want Pakistanis to live in the 13th century while you enjoy life in the 21st century where you are. Hypocrite! :D
My opinion has no tangible effect, it is merely a suggestion among many, ultimately it is the people of Pakistan who will decide. Besides, it is an Islamic Republic, is it not? So why so sternly against the legislation of Islam? :bunny:
 
.
ultimately it is the people of Pakistan who will decide.

Of course. Why impose your views on them?

So why so sternly against the legislation of Islam?

LOL. Please read my posts above. If the people of Pakistan want sharia, they should have it, AS I SAID ABOVE. When they are able to decide on one day to celebrate Eid, it will be a good first step towards that goal. :D
 
. .
Sharing opinions on a public forum =/= imposing your views !!

HAHA. This is you trying to shame them into agreeing by declaring them essentially non Muslim by guilt:

If you're a Muslim, which the majority of Pakistan is, this should not be as a problem to you should it? If you believe in Islam then surely you believe in your God's governance system.

Utterly shameless and hypocritical of you and your ilk.
 
Last edited:
.
HAHA. This is you trying to shame them into agreeing by declaring them essentially non Muslim by guilt:



Utterly shamless and hypocritical of you and your ilk.
Not at all, it is a very relevant question to this thread, Pakistanis, and Muslims in general!

How can you believe your creator was sufficient enough to set highly calculated mathematical and physical laws that organize planets in orbit but wasn’t sufficient enough to create laws that organise human society??

There must be a reason for rejecting the latter or lack of true belief

@Indos Would you not agree?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom