UNHCR Chief: China can play key role in solving refugee crises

[seven7seven]

China is not responsible for any of the the refugee crises around the World. Let Westerners clear up the mess they make.

Uncontrolled immigration destabilises a nation and is designed to obliterate the cultural identity of that country. China must only accept limited amounts of immigrants, who are the brightest and most talented, and can have a positive impact on Chinese economy. These immigrants must also be willing to embrace Chinese Confucian culture and identity. China must not invite trouble onto its own doorstep.

 

[TaiShang]

Chinese and Japanese don't want their Cities become like Paris today

Paris Today

Reverse colonization. The West is morally and politically responsible to handle it.

Thankfully, China has no such historical baggage. Hence, cannot be asked for any favor that goes against its national development and security.

 

[Daniel808]

Reverse colonization. The West is morally and politically responsible to handle it.

Thankfully, China has no such historical baggage. Hence, cannot be asked for any favor that goes against its national development and security.

Honestly, I am feel sympathetic with these people.
They must seeking refugee far from their homeland, because of 'West' destroying their homes.

But when I see what the 'West' to do, I become sick with that.
That the 'West' who Bombed and bring War to the home of those people. Ruin those people peaceful Life.

But now, The 'West' want China to Clean their sh!t? what the hell.

Chinese is not Dumb, Mr.West

 

[Zsari]

1. Real refugees should be accepted, but in the right and fair amount. All countries should participate on it so that the burdon is shared by every country. Its the right of every human to flee from war and accepted as refugees.

2. It has to be strong and strict security and identity check before taking refugees. Dont make the mistake germany did. No open borders and no "welcome all" culture. Or else China will be flooded with illiterated, demanding, unrespectfull, perky, crimal fake refugees.
Beside if this, the country in war should be assisted in every form to regain stability. This benefits the stability in the region and in the world.

Conclusion:
Refugees to China? Yes, in the right amount and with strict checkings.
Assistance to the involved country.

The article is not talking about accepting refugees, but investment in the refugee hosting countries. The root cause however should be the refugee generating countries. However the instability there is foremost a security issue and throwing money at it won't solve the problem, especially when you already have number of wealthy states throwing money in there to generate violence.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

You miss the nuance of language but that's all right.

What I said was this - the global response to the situation in the Middle-East/North Africa can be either based in reality or in victimhood. It seems to me that you are basing your response on reality. That is unacceptable to the SJW platform. According to it, all problems faced by people in that region can be laid on the doorstep of other nations. Of course, while they specifically talk about Western nations, it would logically apply to all nations, insofar as they have dealt with that part of the world in any manner.

For example, I am sure that you are aware that the presence of Israel is often cited as a primary reason for the situation in that part of the world. Support for the Zionist entity is a major reason why the US is blamed. Question is, does the Chinese government have any dealing with the Zionist entity? Defence? Trade? If the answer is yes, then why is China not indirectly responsible for the current situation?

Then we come to the issue of Iran. According to the Saudis and their allies, Iran is the principal instigator in the region. Does China buy oil or invest in Iran? If yes, there you go again.

The House of al Saud and other authoritarian regimes in the Middle-East are also cited as a reason for the discord. Does China buy oil from these nations? If yes, then it must follow that the Chinese are propping up illegitimate, oppressive regimes, against whom much of the public anger is directed.

So you see, whichever way you look at it, you can always find indirect correlation between what a country does and the consequences in the Arab World. According to this theory, there is essentially no difference between the US military support for the House of al Saud and others buying oil.

Of course, one could also take the sane, rational and more nuanced view that interacting with Arab governments as part of international commerce does not mean that China or any other country is responsible for the chaos. But that would mean that at least part of the blame had to be shared by the Arabs themselves. And we cannot allow that, can we?

Hey, don't get angry at me. I am just the messenger. Hope your doubts are now clarified.

Your entire walltext of strawman arguement is a gross misrepresentation of China's position.

China is 1 of the very few countries in the world(other then famously-neutral nations like Switzerland, etc) to be friends with multiple states in opposing factions, simply because she is a pragmatic country that vehemently opposes interfering in other's affairs and is instead- way more interested in making $$$ instead.

e.g Israel vs Arab world. China enjoys good relations with both, even though they know their friend, the Chinese- are also friends with their enemy.

Thus, you're just a 'messenger' who spews bullshit prophecies.

 

[Jacob Martin]

Your entire walltext of strawman arguement is a gross misrepresentation of China's position.

I am glad that you took the time out to find out at least one possible type of logical fallacy. Now kindly take time out to actually understand what I wrote in this post as well as the others.

On a lighter note - I am not denigrating you or anyone else here by saying this. But surely this has to do with the fact that English is the second/third language for most Chinese? Only one Chinese member understood the sarcasm in my post (hint, look at who thanked my posts on this thread and responded to them). Surely, that cannot be because the Chinese don't understand sarcasm as a people? It would be racist to say such a thing.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

"Root causes" is a euphemism for denial of the proposition that the problems in the Middle-East/North Africa could have anything to do with doctrine. It is predicted upon the assertion that when people profess a set of beliefs that would obviously lead to violence, we are to assume that they are, in fact, either lying or deluded. Apparently, the true cause of all violence and misery are despotism , poverty or foreign intervention. It can have nothing to do with belief.

It does not matter whether or not China has done anything to cause the present situation. If you believe in the above-mentioned thesis, then there is always some tangential proof that all counties are complicit in causing the misery that is currently unfolding.

Chinese are very smart people. They have come a long way and now are the one of the world's most powerful nation. So they know very well, how western countries can hurt them by raising human issues. Glad to know Chinese people are aware of the danger saudi refugeed carry with them. I am pretty sure nothing would stop China now because they have started thinking like a superpower. No f***ing emotions

In international humanitarian. We are willing to provide necessary assistance to the Syria refugees. Food, water, clothes, etc. But receiving refugees to our country, we really do not have the ability, nor this obligation... We did not bomb Syria, on the contrary, we have called for a peaceful settlement. But who agrees with us?

Now that the refugee problem is bothering the west, US suddenly noticed China... What??????

What did we do wrong? Instead of US receiving refugees? More than 300 thousand blacks in Guangzhou (I just speak Guangzhou). That's enough for us, and now you want us to continue to take in the Middle East refugees?

God, we are developing countries, great United States of America, please forgive us.

 

[Jlaw]

US should take all Syrian refugees.**** the west. They started the mess let them finish the mess.

China is not responsible for any of the the refugee crises around the World. Let Westerners clear up the mess they make.

Uncontrolled immigration destabilises a nation and is designed to obliterate the cultural identity of that country. China must only accept limited amounts of immigrants, who are the brightest and most talented, and can have a positive impact on Chinese economy. These immigrants must also be willing to embrace Chinese Confucian culture and identity. China must not invite trouble onto its own doorstep.

This is a ruse by western to disrupt China's development and create chaos in China. I see through this ruse. Chinese leaders should see through this tactic also.
**** the west.