What's new

Unfair advantage of Deaths and Drones

Please remove your cute Jerry mouse in your avatar, you seem very biased, unfriendly and stupid twisting logic.

Keep trolling again. :disagree:
I usually dont reply back to trolls like you...but let me clear it that I had also posted this.. (post #19)
levina said:
373 cilvilians and 275 militants killed!!!
Definitely unfair!!

Pakistan so far has been a test bed for the American superpower.High time US started to project drones as a pinpoint precision weapons with limited collateral impact.
Unforyunately drones not just cause injuries and killings, but drone attacks also include property damage and severe economic hardship and emotional trauma for injured victims and surviving family members. Is US gonna pay for this?
The main issue with drone attack (from my POV) seems to be poor intelligence gathering.
While am not against the use of drones but am definitely against using it on civilians without proper intelligence data.
Failure because it earned lesser gains than the harm it did. Their own people started questioning the legality of carrying these strikes in a foreign soil, and protesting against innocent civilians being killed.
or
Pakistan and Yemen both've been on the receiving end of drone strikes.
I'm surprised your govt (which is vociferous about Kashmir) did not raise this issue in UN. Would it not 've been more apropos for NS to talk about drone attacks in north-west Pak than talking about kashmir (Indian side) in UN?


Who these people would be then? Terrorists? They don't hold any control over press, Pakistan? It has no control over its own domestic press how would it control International press. So who these people are Obama? USG? or US citizens? (by the way latter mostly watch fox news and are as unaware as some castaways on some island)
Hmm..
Somehow I feel the number of deaths (by drone attacks) has been reduced to almost half in this article. True?
 
If same thing done by PAF jets using unguided bombs and rockets then all killed people will become militants and Pakistani will hail their air force. No civilian die in PAF attacks which use dump bomb and has much less endurance compare to very accurate hellfire missile. I think that USA should use b-52 and carpet bomb whole area.so pakistanis won't complain about drone.
You genius civilians have fled the area,so yes militants are being are targeted ,if there are any civilian casualties it's their fault they were told to leave.How do you figure PAF jets use unguided bomb.For your information we don't need the US anymore, Zarb-e-azb will finish the last know militant in the area.
 
my only complain with Pakistan army is that it is not using chemical weapons on the remote hideouts and cave networks which will not only save countless lives of our soldiers who have to go there on foot later and face ambushes but also instil fear among the cave dwelling pests and scum the TTP are.
Flame thrower has been used to clear caves and tunnels...
Good question is why Pakistan accept US Drone at first place, why accept the drones in 2007 where no other countries can accept it ????

Is Pakistan slow learner or even realize later after 20 years?
Mush ahs done so much damage to Pakistan that no other in our history of 67 years has done...
If same thing done by PAF jets using unguided bombs and rockets then all killed people will become militants and Pakistani will hail their air force. No civilian die in PAF attacks which use dump bomb and has much less endurance compare to very accurate hellfire missile. I think that USA should use b-52 and carpet bomb whole area.so pakistanis won't complain about drone.
PAF used laser guided bombs,which are deployed by intel given from CAD unit on ground.....

Pakistan and Yemen both've been on the receiving end of drone strikes.
I'm surprised your govt (which is vociferous about Kashmir) did not raise this issue in UN. Would it not 've been more apropos for NS to talk about drone attacks in north-west Pak than talking about kashmir (Indian side) in UN?
Majority of Pakistani polticans have property and business worth trillion dollers in WEST and US,they will do nothing so as with bureaucracy..
 
Majority of Pakistani polticans have property and business worth trillion dollers in WEST and US,they will do nothing so as with bureaucracy..
It's quite expected with PPP,but do you remember how PMLN before the elections had a tough stand against Drone strikes,the very moment they came into power,they couldn't do shit and didn't do shit.
 
If same thing done by PAF jets using unguided bombs and rockets then all killed people will become militants and Pakistani will hail their air force. No civilian die in PAF attacks which use dump bomb and has much less endurance compare to very accurate hellfire missile. I think that USA should use b-52 and carpet bomb whole area.so pakistanis won't complain about drone.

Would have been better if you hadn't actively shared your thoughts. First just do little research equip yourself with time periods of both these kind of attacks, circumstances on the ground and populace presence.

Otherwise commenting on a matter that is almost International and attempting to defame Pakistan and its forces is never a good idea
 
You genius civilians have fled the area,so yes militants are being are targeted ,if there are any civilian casualties it's their fault they were told to leave.How do you figure PAF jets use unguided bomb.For your information we don't need the US anymore, Zarb-e-azb will finish the last know militant in the area.

And Pakistan never used its air force before your operation zarb e whatever? It doesn't matter whether there is any operation going on or not, Pakistani jets only kill terrorists.

I really doubt that Pakistan can afford expensive guided bombs most of time.
 
Last edited:
And Pakistan never used its air force before your operation zarb e whatever? It doesn't matter whether there is any operation going on or not, Pakistani jets only kill terrorists.

I really doubt that Pakistan can afford expensive guided bombs.
Guys we got a genius here , Einstein would be a better word.Can't afford :rofl:
 
Flame thrower has been used to clear caves and tunnels...

.
if correct then its excellent deployment
also phosphorus grenade does the same thing.
but chemicals render those caves unusable for a longer period too. anyway whatever gets the job done
I prefer both the scorched as well as decomposed and green terrorist corps
 
I usually dont reply back to trolls like you...but let me clear it that I had also posted this.. (post #19)

Read again what Irfan Balouch said : hi

you must be high

Unfair advantage of Deaths and Drones

check these protesters specially the last American ones
I dont think they have any empathy towards the "good terrorists"

but never mind your vision and logic is blurred by the gas and fat you get visiting this site and its threads



Jerry loser? :o:
 
Guys we got a genius here , Einstein would be a better word.Can't afford :rofl:
That was an error. I wanted to say that I really doubt that Pakistan can use guided bomb most of time. Btw why did you ignored my first paragraph?
 
Pakistan and Yemen both've been on the receiving end of drone strikes.
I'm surprised your govt (which is vociferous about Kashmir) did not raise this issue in UN. Would it not 've been more apropos for NS to talk about drone attacks in north-west Pak than talking about kashmir (Indian side) in UN?

Levina if you think I am an idiot just simply say it, this issue can never be equated with Kashmir issue please, there is no analogy. Don't bring Kashmir here to this discussion table.

When US invaded Afghanistan, what was the UN's stance on that invasion? What was even your own country's stance at that time?

Hmm..
Somehow I feel the number of deaths (by drone attacks) has been reduced to almost half in this article. True?

Nobody can give an accurate number, and I feel number of US and Nato's deaths reported in Afghanistan is quarter the number of actual fatalities.
 
That was an error. I wanted to say that I really doubt that Pakistan can use guided bomb most of time. Btw why did you ignored my first paragraph?
Take your meds dude. Knas replied to your first bullshit paragraph and i quote "PAF used laser guided bombs,which are deployed by intel given from CAD unit on ground."
 
but chemicals render those caves unusable for a longer period too. anyway whatever gets the job done

The only purpose is not only to kill miscreants hiding in caves or hideouts I think, what about the intel gathering afterwards? Would chemicals allow our troops to do that?
 
Levina if you think I am an idiot just simply say it, this issue can never be equated with Kashmir issue please, there is no analogy. Don't bring Kashmir here to this discussion table.

When US invaded Afghanistan, what was the UN's stance on that invasion? What was even your own country's stance at that time?
Gosh!
why 're you guys always ready to split and slice at the mere mention of Kashmir?

But the question still remains why didnt NS take up this issue in UN? I agree UN's help would not 've changed much, but Pak could've got the support of other nations in this matter.

Nobody can give an accurate number, and I feel number of US and Nato's deaths reported in Afghanistan is quarter the number of actual fatalities.
True that!
 
Take your meds dude. Knas replied to your first bullshit paragraph and i quote "PAF used laser guided bombs,which are deployed by intel given from CAD unit on ground."

ok. I admit that Pakistan is a super rich country which can afford guided bomb everytime, something which even USA can't afford. Now answer this, before this operation whenever pakistan bombed militants. Only militants were killed?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom