Levina
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2013
- Messages
- 15,278
- Reaction score
- 59
- Country
- Location
I usually dont reply back to trolls like you...but let me clear it that I had also posted this.. (post #19)Please remove your cute Jerry mouse in your avatar, you seem very biased, unfriendly and stupid twisting logic.
Keep trolling again.
levina said:373 cilvilians and 275 militants killed!!!
Definitely unfair!!
Pakistan so far has been a test bed for the American superpower.High time US started to project drones as a pinpoint precision weapons with limited collateral impact.
Unforyunately drones not just cause injuries and killings, but drone attacks also include property damage and severe economic hardship and emotional trauma for injured victims and surviving family members. Is US gonna pay for this?
The main issue with drone attack (from my POV) seems to be poor intelligence gathering.
While am not against the use of drones but am definitely against using it on civilians without proper intelligence data.
Pakistan and Yemen both've been on the receiving end of drone strikes.Failure because it earned lesser gains than the harm it did. Their own people started questioning the legality of carrying these strikes in a foreign soil, and protesting against innocent civilians being killed.
or
I'm surprised your govt (which is vociferous about Kashmir) did not raise this issue in UN. Would it not 've been more apropos for NS to talk about drone attacks in north-west Pak than talking about kashmir (Indian side) in UN?
Hmm..Who these people would be then? Terrorists? They don't hold any control over press, Pakistan? It has no control over its own domestic press how would it control International press. So who these people are Obama? USG? or US citizens? (by the way latter mostly watch fox news and are as unaware as some castaways on some island)
Somehow I feel the number of deaths (by drone attacks) has been reduced to almost half in this article. True?