What's new

Understanding Imran ,THE REASONS BEHIND HIS support to TTp?

it was a combined decision by Ik, NS, parliament, ISI, Army and Ulema.
But criticizing one is not fair unless a hidden agenda behind it.
Media doing it for their rating, still dont know how media works, go spend some time in media offices, see how their works, how they made issues for shows If they dont do that then what will happen to trillion Rupees industry.
India should not do dialogue with Kashmiris as per your definition....
TTP is a terrorist but we need to isolate them first, it is good for us that TTP group starts killing each other through agreement, by doing this we can save our soldiers life and civilians security for long term.
U lack operational knowledge too.
marginalize them by creating groups amongst them and will do operation when US leave, if we do operation now then they leave and escape to Afghanistan and then come back with more resources and weapons and kill more. It was already done in the past. So many TTP leaders escaped due to it and doing operation from there.
Operation can be done when they have no place to hide in Afghanistan and that will be done when US leave.
Brother please understand the scenarios and reality.
These criminals will be killed by us but patience is the key. Wait for the right and then bang.
I hope you understand.

what world are you living in? they are never giong to leavve--even now they are saying 20,000 plus men remain plus 100,000 mercenaries--thats equal to the total of the limited contingent of soviet forces in the 80's....

friend how many times you hve met with prince chrls of england?lolzzz
how many pics you hve with him?
come on sometimes we,just need to be real, what he was doing the day, & time plz note that, what happend in peshawar ?
like all politicians, he dont jst give a dam about it, i mean foolish poor pakistanis?
its just the image he devloped for them but, back in england he have a different image, the real image what he is, & what he was?
i m not a supporter of both IMRAN or ALTAF but dont you think, we are jst talking about 2 different classes even in england, one was the golden playboy, hving realationships of the month, & been in the royal guset list? a real lackey for the British?
the other was a poor, one who jst went there by luck? & was never invited in any royal wine buffets?

poor??? with millions in cash found in his residence---living for decades in vilayet on what income? he is a scumbag if ever there was one....a crook charlatan and evnemy of humanity...
 
thanks friend!
after every dam blood bath, peoples keep thinking about him, & when they can satisfied thiemselves yhey all end up like you, cause they dont have someone else?
his unexperincenesss has cost us so many lives, & if you think its brilliant, his idea of giving the terrorists a office & then a sign, like a bomb blast to fight a election next time, all i can say is , pakistan ka alllha hi hafiz!
plz stop asurting me about afghan talibs, or pakistan talibs?
i was in PA so i, know more thn you r jst trying now?

your army experience seem to have been for naught---retired / left as a captain or major? grumbling in the ranks....

I dont support IK especially after he included feudals and crooks like "pirs", gaddi nasheens as well as charlaltans like "nawaz is still my leader" bloke....

you are not going to enslave 14 million armed ppl in the pakhtunkhwa,,,,,,,like I said in post #5 the paksitanis need to figure what is going on first and then they can do something...


but nothing is going to work inthe present setup---only captians and majors will die by the dozens---what re thye fighitng for? to keep hamza zhahbaz as de facto CM of punjab? to keep asif in his hacienda in lahore? to keep the fat toad of vilayat in contrl of karachi? IN ancient times e.g korea they used to wipe out the entire clan of the rebels if the rebellion was defeated......you need to clean out the entire clans of there feudals, robber baron businessmen, fake pirs and faqirs and treacherous generals like tariq and then only can youbegin to do something meaningful
 
what world are you living in? they are never giong to leavve--even now they are saying 20,000 plus men remain plus 100,000 mercenaries--thats equal to the total of the limited contingent of soviet forces in the 80's....

They will leave but YES they have their soldiers around 20 k there,
My argument is at least there will be no threat to us BY these 20 K soldiers because this number is very limited for war against Pakistan so we can kill TTP in Aghanistan. At this time by having 100K soldiers in Afghanistan we are thinking about US attack against us if we start attacking TTP in Afghanistan. Its all about operational tactics, go asked military about it.
 
your army experience seem to have been for naught---retired / left as a captain or major? grumbling in the ranks....

I dont support IK especially after he included feudals and crooks like "pirs", gaddi nasheens as well as charlaltans like "nawaz is still my leader" bloke....

you are not going to enslave 14 million armed ppl in the pakhtunkhwa,,,,,,,like I said in post #5 the paksitanis need to figure what is going on first and then they can do something...


but nothing is going to work inthe present setup---only captians and majors will die by the dozens---what re thye fighitng for? to keep hamza zhahbaz as de facto CM of punjab? to keep asif in his hacienda in lahore? to keep the fat toad of vilayat in contrl of karachi? IN ancient times e.g korea they used to wipe out the entire clan of the rebels if the rebellion was defeated......you need to clean out the entire clans of there feudals, robber baron businessmen, fake pirs and faqirs and treacherous generals like tariq and then only can youbegin to do something meaningful

genrls comes from majors & captians?
looking forward for some one like SISI of egypt!
with you on that, wipe out all & forever!

it was a combined decision by Ik, NS, parliament, ISI, Army and Ulema.
But criticizing one is not fair unless a hidden agenda behind it.
Media doing it for their rating, still dont know how media works, go spend some time in media offices, see how their works, how they made issues for shows If they dont do that then what will happen to trillion Rupees industry.
India should not do dialogue with Kashmiris as per your definition....
TTP is a terrorist but we need to isolate them first, it is good for us that TTP group starts killing each other through agreement, by doing this we can save our soldiers life and civilians security for long term.
U lack operational knowledge too.
marginalize them by creating groups amongst them and will do operation when US leave, if we do operation now then they leave and escape to Afghanistan and then come back with more resources and weapons and kill more. It was already done in the past. So many TTP leaders escaped due to it and doing operation from there.
Operation can be done when they have no place to hide in Afghanistan and that will be done when US leave.
Brother please understand the scenarios and reality.
These criminals will be killed by us but patience is the key. Wait for the right and then bang.
I hope you understand.

combined decesion by army, IsI?lolzzx

it was a combined decision by Ik, NS, parliament, ISI, Army and Ulema.
But criticizing one is not fair unless a hidden agenda behind it.
Media doing it for their rating, still dont know how media works, go spend some time in media offices, see how their works, how they made issues for shows If they dont do that then what will happen to trillion Rupees industry.
India should not do dialogue with Kashmiris as per your definition....
TTP is a terrorist but we need to isolate them first, it is good for us that TTP group starts killing each other through agreement, by doing this we can save our soldiers life and civilians security for long term.
U lack operational knowledge too.
marginalize them by creating groups amongst them and will do operation when US leave, if we do operation now then they leave and escape to Afghanistan and then come back with more resources and weapons and kill more. It was already done in the past. So many TTP leaders escaped due to it and doing operation from there.
Operation can be done when they have no place to hide in Afghanistan and that will be done when US leave.
Brother please understand the scenarios and reality.
These criminals will be killed by us but patience is the key. Wait for the right and then bang.
I hope you understand.

combined decesion by army, IsI?lolzzx
 
They will leave but YES they have their soldiers around 20 k there,
My argument is at least there will be no threat to us BY these 20 K soldiers because this number is very limited for war against Pakistan so we can kill TTP in Aghanistan. At this time by having 100K soldiers in Afghanistan we are thinking about US attack against us if we start attacking TTP in Afghanistan. Its all about operational tactics, go asked military about it.

the threat was never ground troops it has always been air power --the USAF can reduce your puny toys toys and toy soldiers to scrap in a few days.....the big bangs you have notwithstanding-----so stay in your shoes and do as you are told or your slave masters [ganja and asif and the toad of vilayet] tell you....
 
the threat was never ground troops it has always been air power --the USAF can reduce your puny toys toys and toy soldiers to scrap in a few days.....the big bangs you have notwithstanding-----so stay in your shoes and do as you are told or your slave masters [ganja and asif and the toad of vilayet] tell you....

lets add a jew agent IK in it? for god sake dont make him fake angel?
like they all made CJ before that?lolzz fake angel of croupt justice.?

http://dawn.com/news/1046695/bloody-attacks-spell-gloom-for-peace-talks

PESHAWAR: Three weeks after the country's main political parties backed the idea of talks with the Pakistani Taliban militants, the plan looks in deep trouble, hit hard by a wave of bloody attacks.

In the space of a week, the northwestern city of Peshawar has suffered three major bombings, killing over 140 people — the vast majority of them civilians.

Hurried denials issued by the main umbrella Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) group hint at divisions within the organisation and the rise of splinter factions keen to pursue their own agenda rather than follow the central leadership.

Peshawar is no stranger to bloodshed. It lies on the edge of Pakistan's tribal areas and has frequently been hit by bombings and shootings.

However, the brutality of the recent attacks — a suicide bombing on a church service, a bomb on a bus carrying government staff home after work and the latest, a powerful car bomb targeting a busy market on Sunday — has shocked locals.

“The government should publicly hang the killers of innocent people,” said Gul Mohammad, a Peshawar junk shop owner.

“I have a very simple question: why is the government so reluctant to launch an army operation against the Taliban?”

The TTP insists it targets only legitimate military assets in its fight against the Pakistani state and says the recent attacks are a conspiracy to scotch the proposed talks.

But a Taliban commander in the country's northwest admitted the prospect of negotiations had led to division within the organisation, which has pledged allegiance to one-eyed Afghan Taliban chief Mullah Omar as well as to Al Qaeda.

“There are even more differences on several other issues and you know Asmatullah Muawiya has also been sacked by our main leadership,” the commander declared.

Muawiya was the militants' commander in Punjab province, who was cast out by the TTP senior leadership for welcoming the government offer of peace talks.

Hardline groups closer to Al Qaeda, more sectarian and anti-West in outlook than the mainstream TTP, have rejected talks outright.

Factions from Mohmand and Khyber tribal areas and Darra Adam Khel district — all neighbouring Peshawar — are said to be staunchly opposed to the peace talks, and the authorities are probing whether they were behind the recent attacks.

Another militant source said overtures made to certain groups had triggered the Peshawar attacks as others sought to make their influence felt.

“The latest bout of attacks has come because the security establishment is selective in talking to the militants. It wants to talk to some elements while crushing the others,” the source related.

Pressure through violence?

Security officials remain sceptical about the TTP denials, saying the sophisticated nature of the three attacks suggested an experienced, well-equipped group was behind them.

“Though TTP has publicly disowned the latest series of bombings, we are very much convinced that TTP as an organisation is involved,” a senior security official in Peshawar said.

“They want to build pressure on both provincial and central governments before the peace talks.”

A pair of suicide bombers smuggled into a church, a remote-controlled bomb planted on a government staff bus and a 200-kilo car bomb exploding in a busy market in the heart of Peshawar; all this could not be the work of a fledgling group, the official declared.

Rahimullah Yusufzai, a senior analyst and expert on militancy in Pakistan said that while the perpetrators of the past week's atrocities were unclear, the outcome was not.

“If the purpose of these attacks was creating an obstruction in the proposed peace talks then these attacks have achieved that goal,” he said.

“Government is under extreme public pressure due to these recent attacks and losing public support on the proposed peace talks.”

Even with public backing, the two sides' positions look difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile.

On one side the TTP have laid down exacting conditions for taking part in talks — the withdrawal of troops from the tribal areas, the release of their prisoners and a government ceasefire.

On the other, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who was in New York for the United Nations (UN) General Assembly as the attacks unfolded, told the Wall Street Journal that the TTP must recognise the Pakistani constitution and lay down their weapons.

Share 0 Comment(s) Print

http://dawn.com/news/1046695/bloody-attacks-spell-gloom-for-peace-talks

PESHAWAR: Three weeks after the country's main political parties backed the idea of talks with the Pakistani Taliban militants, the plan looks in deep trouble, hit hard by a wave of bloody attacks.

In the space of a week, the northwestern city of Peshawar has suffered three major bombings, killing over 140 people — the vast majority of them civilians.

Hurried denials issued by the main umbrella Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) group hint at divisions within the organisation and the rise of splinter factions keen to pursue their own agenda rather than follow the central leadership.

Peshawar is no stranger to bloodshed. It lies on the edge of Pakistan's tribal areas and has frequently been hit by bombings and shootings.

However, the brutality of the recent attacks — a suicide bombing on a church service, a bomb on a bus carrying government staff home after work and the latest, a powerful car bomb targeting a busy market on Sunday — has shocked locals.

“The government should publicly hang the killers of innocent people,” said Gul Mohammad, a Peshawar junk shop owner.

“I have a very simple question: why is the government so reluctant to launch an army operation against the Taliban?”

The TTP insists it targets only legitimate military assets in its fight against the Pakistani state and says the recent attacks are a conspiracy to scotch the proposed talks.

But a Taliban commander in the country's northwest admitted the prospect of negotiations had led to division within the organisation, which has pledged allegiance to one-eyed Afghan Taliban chief Mullah Omar as well as to Al Qaeda.

“There are even more differences on several other issues and you know Asmatullah Muawiya has also been sacked by our main leadership,” the commander declared.

Muawiya was the militants' commander in Punjab province, who was cast out by the TTP senior leadership for welcoming the government offer of peace talks.

Hardline groups closer to Al Qaeda, more sectarian and anti-West in outlook than the mainstream TTP, have rejected talks outright.

Factions from Mohmand and Khyber tribal areas and Darra Adam Khel district — all neighbouring Peshawar — are said to be staunchly opposed to the peace talks, and the authorities are probing whether they were behind the recent attacks.

Another militant source said overtures made to certain groups had triggered the Peshawar attacks as others sought to make their influence felt.

“The latest bout of attacks has come because the security establishment is selective in talking to the militants. It wants to talk to some elements while crushing the others,” the source related.

Pressure through violence?

Security officials remain sceptical about the TTP denials, saying the sophisticated nature of the three attacks suggested an experienced, well-equipped group was behind them.

“Though TTP has publicly disowned the latest series of bombings, we are very much convinced that TTP as an organisation is involved,” a senior security official in Peshawar said.

“They want to build pressure on both provincial and central governments before the peace talks.”

A pair of suicide bombers smuggled into a church, a remote-controlled bomb planted on a government staff bus and a 200-kilo car bomb exploding in a busy market in the heart of Peshawar; all this could not be the work of a fledgling group, the official declared.

Rahimullah Yusufzai, a senior analyst and expert on militancy in Pakistan said that while the perpetrators of the past week's atrocities were unclear, the outcome was not.

“If the purpose of these attacks was creating an obstruction in the proposed peace talks then these attacks have achieved that goal,” he said.

“Government is under extreme public pressure due to these recent attacks and losing public support on the proposed peace talks.”

Even with public backing, the two sides' positions look difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile.

On one side the TTP have laid down exacting conditions for taking part in talks — the withdrawal of troops from the tribal areas, the release of their prisoners and a government ceasefire.

On the other, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who was in New York for the United Nations (UN) General Assembly as the attacks unfolded, told the Wall Street Journal that the TTP must recognise the Pakistani constitution and lay down their weapons.

Share 0 Comment(s) Print
 
lets add a jew agent IK in it? for god sake dont make him fake angel?
like they all made CJ before that?lolzz fake angel of croupt justice.?

i dont support IK as I said earlier----it is you who needs to stop worshipping the fat toad in vilayet...

one should support the principle and not the man----the principle requires that we identify the issues and the protagonists and then choose the side of justice----as I stated in post #5;

as for jew IK---slander is not recommended---- jew agent IK? to begin with it is forbidden, as a muslim, to hate or condemn jews or christians or other for that matter----what you can, and must, oppose is injustice and tyranny by anyone or any group regardless of their faith-----

you hate IK because he is trying to follow the path of islam? I dont know what is in his heart or what he does in secret---but I do know what he says in public---much of it is correct and needs to be suported --so support what is right and oppose what is wrong--he is not an angel--he will make mistakes --so oppose him hi when does that but support what is right whether he or anyone does what is right--support what is right.....
 
the threat was never ground troops it has always been air power --the USAF can reduce your puny toys toys and toy soldiers to scrap in a few days.....the big bangs you have notwithstanding-----so stay in your shoes and do as you are told or your slave masters [ganja and asif and the toad of vilayet] tell you....

Now i agreed on it.
Cheers :)

lets add a jew agent IK in it? for god sake dont make him fake angel?
like they all made CJ before that?lolzz fake angel of croupt justice.?

http://dawn.com/news/1046695/bloody-attacks-spell-gloom-for-peace-talks

PESHAWAR: Three weeks after the country's main political parties backed the idea of talks with the Pakistani Taliban militants, the plan looks in deep trouble, hit hard by a wave of bloody attacks.

In the space of a week, the northwestern city of Peshawar has suffered three major bombings, killing over 140 people — the vast majority of them civilians.

Hurried denials issued by the main umbrella Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) group hint at divisions within the organisation and the rise of splinter factions keen to pursue their own agenda rather than follow the central leadership.

Peshawar is no stranger to bloodshed. It lies on the edge of Pakistan's tribal areas and has frequently been hit by bombings and shootings.

However, the brutality of the recent attacks — a suicide bombing on a church service, a bomb on a bus carrying government staff home after work and the latest, a powerful car bomb targeting a busy market on Sunday — has shocked locals.

“The government should publicly hang the killers of innocent people,” said Gul Mohammad, a Peshawar junk shop owner.

“I have a very simple question: why is the government so reluctant to launch an army operation against the Taliban?”

The TTP insists it targets only legitimate military assets in its fight against the Pakistani state and says the recent attacks are a conspiracy to scotch the proposed talks.

But a Taliban commander in the country's northwest admitted the prospect of negotiations had led to division within the organisation, which has pledged allegiance to one-eyed Afghan Taliban chief Mullah Omar as well as to Al Qaeda.

“There are even more differences on several other issues and you know Asmatullah Muawiya has also been sacked by our main leadership,” the commander declared.

Muawiya was the militants' commander in Punjab province, who was cast out by the TTP senior leadership for welcoming the government offer of peace talks.

Hardline groups closer to Al Qaeda, more sectarian and anti-West in outlook than the mainstream TTP, have rejected talks outright.

Factions from Mohmand and Khyber tribal areas and Darra Adam Khel district — all neighbouring Peshawar — are said to be staunchly opposed to the peace talks, and the authorities are probing whether they were behind the recent attacks.

Another militant source said overtures made to certain groups had triggered the Peshawar attacks as others sought to make their influence felt.

“The latest bout of attacks has come because the security establishment is selective in talking to the militants. It wants to talk to some elements while crushing the others,” the source related.

Pressure through violence?

Security officials remain sceptical about the TTP denials, saying the sophisticated nature of the three attacks suggested an experienced, well-equipped group was behind them.

“Though TTP has publicly disowned the latest series of bombings, we are very much convinced that TTP as an organisation is involved,” a senior security official in Peshawar said.

“They want to build pressure on both provincial and central governments before the peace talks.”

A pair of suicide bombers smuggled into a church, a remote-controlled bomb planted on a government staff bus and a 200-kilo car bomb exploding in a busy market in the heart of Peshawar; all this could not be the work of a fledgling group, the official declared.

Rahimullah Yusufzai, a senior analyst and expert on militancy in Pakistan said that while the perpetrators of the past week's atrocities were unclear, the outcome was not.

“If the purpose of these attacks was creating an obstruction in the proposed peace talks then these attacks have achieved that goal,” he said.

“Government is under extreme public pressure due to these recent attacks and losing public support on the proposed peace talks.”

Even with public backing, the two sides' positions look difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile.

On one side the TTP have laid down exacting conditions for taking part in talks — the withdrawal of troops from the tribal areas, the release of their prisoners and a government ceasefire.

On the other, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who was in New York for the United Nations (UN) General Assembly as the attacks unfolded, told the Wall Street Journal that the TTP must recognise the Pakistani constitution and lay down their weapons.

Share 0 Comment(s) Print

http://dawn.com/news/1046695/bloody-attacks-spell-gloom-for-peace-talks

PESHAWAR: Three weeks after the country's main political parties backed the idea of talks with the Pakistani Taliban militants, the plan looks in deep trouble, hit hard by a wave of bloody attacks.

In the space of a week, the northwestern city of Peshawar has suffered three major bombings, killing over 140 people — the vast majority of them civilians.

Hurried denials issued by the main umbrella Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) group hint at divisions within the organisation and the rise of splinter factions keen to pursue their own agenda rather than follow the central leadership.

Peshawar is no stranger to bloodshed. It lies on the edge of Pakistan's tribal areas and has frequently been hit by bombings and shootings.

However, the brutality of the recent attacks — a suicide bombing on a church service, a bomb on a bus carrying government staff home after work and the latest, a powerful car bomb targeting a busy market on Sunday — has shocked locals.

“The government should publicly hang the killers of innocent people,” said Gul Mohammad, a Peshawar junk shop owner.

“I have a very simple question: why is the government so reluctant to launch an army operation against the Taliban?”

The TTP insists it targets only legitimate military assets in its fight against the Pakistani state and says the recent attacks are a conspiracy to scotch the proposed talks.

But a Taliban commander in the country's northwest admitted the prospect of negotiations had led to division within the organisation, which has pledged allegiance to one-eyed Afghan Taliban chief Mullah Omar as well as to Al Qaeda.

“There are even more differences on several other issues and you know Asmatullah Muawiya has also been sacked by our main leadership,” the commander declared.

Muawiya was the militants' commander in Punjab province, who was cast out by the TTP senior leadership for welcoming the government offer of peace talks.

Hardline groups closer to Al Qaeda, more sectarian and anti-West in outlook than the mainstream TTP, have rejected talks outright.

Factions from Mohmand and Khyber tribal areas and Darra Adam Khel district — all neighbouring Peshawar — are said to be staunchly opposed to the peace talks, and the authorities are probing whether they were behind the recent attacks.

Another militant source said overtures made to certain groups had triggered the Peshawar attacks as others sought to make their influence felt.

“The latest bout of attacks has come because the security establishment is selective in talking to the militants. It wants to talk to some elements while crushing the others,” the source related.

Pressure through violence?

Security officials remain sceptical about the TTP denials, saying the sophisticated nature of the three attacks suggested an experienced, well-equipped group was behind them.

“Though TTP has publicly disowned the latest series of bombings, we are very much convinced that TTP as an organisation is involved,” a senior security official in Peshawar said.

“They want to build pressure on both provincial and central governments before the peace talks.”

A pair of suicide bombers smuggled into a church, a remote-controlled bomb planted on a government staff bus and a 200-kilo car bomb exploding in a busy market in the heart of Peshawar; all this could not be the work of a fledgling group, the official declared.

Rahimullah Yusufzai, a senior analyst and expert on militancy in Pakistan said that while the perpetrators of the past week's atrocities were unclear, the outcome was not.

“If the purpose of these attacks was creating an obstruction in the proposed peace talks then these attacks have achieved that goal,” he said.

“Government is under extreme public pressure due to these recent attacks and losing public support on the proposed peace talks.”

Even with public backing, the two sides' positions look difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile.

On one side the TTP have laid down exacting conditions for taking part in talks — the withdrawal of troops from the tribal areas, the release of their prisoners and a government ceasefire.

On the other, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who was in New York for the United Nations (UN) General Assembly as the attacks unfolded, told the Wall Street Journal that the TTP must recognise the Pakistani constitution and lay down their weapons.

Share 0 Comment(s) Print

OK so you are a FAZLU FAN...
Plz stop giving fatwas like TTP to anyone,
no one is agent, Yes, people do pressurized in some cases, even army pressurized too. remember Musharaf, Who is he, ARMY CHIEF.
Who do you think is right for Pakistan, I just want to know who is the angel and how it looks :)
 
Now i agreed on it.
Cheers :)



OK so you are a FAZLU FAN...
Plz stop giving fatwas like TTP to anyone,
no one is agent, Yes, people do pressurized in some cases, even army pressurized too. remember Musharaf, Who is he, ARMY CHIEF.
Who do you think is right for Pakistan, I just want to know who is the angel and how it looks :)

no body is angel, but anyone giving the freee offices to the most brutal killers of the modren history, must be hving some hidden agenda?
i personaly dont like, fazlu chacha, but he seems to be the most moderte one, off course he needs money..?me too?
pakarmy has proven again & again, that when it comes standing for pakistan, sacrifying for pakistan, it was allways pakistan frist?
not like, prince chrls or gold smiths frist?
or TTp,s offices frist?
 
i dont support IK as I said earlier----it is you who needs to stop worshipping the fat toad in vilayet...

one should support the principle and not the man----the principle requires that we identify the issues and the protagonists and then choose the side of justice----as I stated in post #5;

as for jew IK---slander is not recommended---- jew agent IK? to begin with it is forbidden, as a muslim, to hate or condemn jews or christians or other for that matter----what you can, and must, oppose is injustice and tyranny by anyone or any group regardless of their faith-----

you hate IK because he is trying to follow the path of islam? I dont know what is in his heart or what he does in secret---but I do know what he says in public---much of it is correct and needs to be suported --so support what is right and oppose what is wrong--he is not an angel--he will make mistakes --so oppose him hi when does that but support what is right whether he or anyone does what is right--support what is right.....
you hate IK because he is trying to follow the path of islam?
yes he is following the islamic path, by surrendrring to the brutal killers of muslims, & attending royal wine buffets?
wow its the same of islamic path, followed by terrorists, taking head shots of 14 years olds?
i mean really idealogy is simmilar?
what i am really affrad of is selling pakistani nucks or inviting international forces, to take our nucks, may become islamc path paracticed by TTp supported by NS, IK?
 
you hate IK because he is trying to follow the path of islam?
yes he is following the islamic path, by surrendrring to the brutal killers of muslims, & attending royal wine buffets?
wow its the same of islamic path, followed by terrorists, taking head shots of 14 years olds?
i mean really idealogy is simmilar?
what i am really affrad of is selling pakistani nucks or inviting international forces, to take our nucks, may become islamc path paracticed by TTp supported by NS, IK?

"you hate IK because he is trying to follow the path of islam?" where did this non sense come from---I dont hate IK and I certainly dont hate followers of islam...

"its the same of islamic path, followed by terrorists, taking head shots of 14 years olds?
i mean really idealogy is simmilar?"

I think you cant read english--I said follow what is right and oppose what is wrong --that is islam----what ever the bozos do is not islam and will you oppose islam because these barbarians are commiting crimes in the name of the same?

that is what i am saying you dont follow people or groups of people--you follow principles---this means you oppose and support the same people depending on whether their actions are right or wrong--

life is not simple cut and dried----
 
I often read this writer's articles (n its in Dawn on every Sunday) but this is an opinion ... If i believe this opinion then IK is a brilliant politician ... if i don't then i m an IK fan (which i am) ... How can i ever forget that summer day in May when our whole family was together with one purpose ... to stamp on 'bat' ... otherwise we wudn't care if it was not for IK ... n all those who want operation to kill the 'Taliban' ... we hav done everything n in our neighbourhood the mightiest forces in the history of mankind have tried every method in the book except 'total annihilation' but r they successful ... ???
 
Off topic... :offpost:
Post reported!!

you are no one whom i ever cared?keep it up!:rofl::rofl::rofl:

I often read this writer's articles (n its in Dawn on every Sunday) but this is an opinion ... If i believe this opinion then IK is a brilliant politician ... if i don't then i m an IK fan (which i am) ... How can i ever forget that summer day in May when our whole family was together with one purpose ... to stamp on 'bat' ... otherwise we wudn't care if it was not for IK ... n all those who want operation to kill the 'Taliban' ... we hav done everything n in our neighbourhood the mightiest forces in the history of mankind have tried every method in the book except 'total annihilation' but r they successful ... ???
who is running afghanistan? talibans?
why mighty talibans, went like rats to talk with US in qatar?
 
I often read this writer's articles (n its in Dawn on every Sunday) but this is an opinion ... If i believe this opinion then IK is a brilliant politician ... if i don't then i m an IK fan (which i am) ... How can i ever forget that summer day in May when our whole family was together with one purpose ... to stamp on 'bat' ... otherwise we wudn't care if it was not for IK ... n all those who want operation to kill the 'Taliban' ... we hav done everything n in our neighbourhood the mightiest forces in the history of mankind have tried every method in the book except 'total annihilation' but r they successful ... ???
who is running afghanistan? talibans?
why mighty talibans, went like rats to talk with US in qatar?
sorry bt still, US is in 75% control of afghanistan, they dont care if talibans hold some torabora hieghts?
we need to open our eyes?
shouldnt fall into, JI +PTI FAKE PRAPOGANDA?
that talibans hve won that, war?
you & your family just hve voted a, fake playboy who just wants to be PM, by giving the offices to talibans?
what next, if terrorists demands, to make pakistan talbanistan?
i guss they already, saying it!
what then, when some mullhas strats liking your 14 years old daughter, sister , & when you reject him, he come & takes out a head shot of your 14 years old sister or daughter?
IK,s biggest problem was his love marrige, for money & special contacts, without of them, he will never be able to reach the spot he, is standing now?
but peoples pakistan never voted to him, for the dam soft surrender to terrorists, he is talking now?
US can strike at will any dam time they want, thats real power they hve? with no one to stop?
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom