What's new

UN: Bangladesh urban population will overtake rural population by 2030

India has more electricity consumption than BD for sure.

....and it plays heavily into what we count (and you don't) as urbanised. Thanks for proving my point. Now enjoy looking at those maps some more to see how badly you are stagnating on the ground in reality development wise.

So BBS is lying or does not know about Dhaka population then?

Basically BBS sucks, so who knows what its more right or more wrong about. Whats the point of more urbanisation if your people eat less and earn less than 2010 (measured by the same BBS)?
 
.
Who gives a rat's about Sri Lanka?

@Homo Sapiens was trying to compare with Pakistan and India.

If you really believe that cities like Chittagong are not counted as "urban" in India and Pakistan, then you are even more retarded than I thought.:cheesy:

BD urbanisation is going up a lot quicker than Pakistan and India and has just beaten India and that is more reason for heart-burn from a loser like you. Urbanisation is used as a primary marker of a country's development.

BD is a tiny country of course urbanization going to be easy here. I am worried about the management. Look how unorganize Dhaka is. Islamabad looks Europe compared with Dhaka.
 
. .
Urbanization does not mean coming to the megacity but to the urban centers to avail the utility and municipal services. The only way to provide those services is through urbanisation. The more urban means more developed the population is. If your urbanization rate is low that means your people are not living in those FTZs and industrial parks rather living in the remote villages or up in the mountains.
I think, unless there are job opportunities, people will not move from rural to urban areas. However, there is another side. I have seen many of the towns and cities are now being expanded to include many surrounding villages. So, people in the expanded urban areas will be regarded as urban people. This kind of urbanization may happen.

Another point is the possible heavy urbanization of the future industrial zones like Mirsarai, Iswardy, Matarbari and Paira port areas. Heavy industrialization and economic activities will cause creation of many new jobs in these areas, and this will cause people from even far away regions, say from north, to come and seek jobs. This will result in the heavy urbanization of the country.
 
.
As you can see from the reply below yours, its basically butthurt and incompetence (and NASA satellite images of much more recent years i.e 2012 - 2016 well after 1971 confirms it).

They will keep bringing it to "1971" but they cannot actually argue any massive transfer of resources (past 1% at best and ignoring what they got in return as well completely) beyond skin deep feelz on it:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-...er-than-pakistans.536089/page-7#post-10137373

They will soon find a way to blame this on Pakistan and 1971 too (no matter that its a 2010 - 2016 time period):

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bang...g-pakistan-behind.556972/page-8#post-10471573

What part of India has much greater electricity generation do you not understand?
Of course India will "light-up" more as it has far more street lights and other sources of light due to err.. greater electricity supply.:cheesy:

lol at this self-proclaimed "1% fiscal transfer" and somehow what BD got in return makes up for it? Your retardation knows no bounds.
BD should have got "in return" without having to transfer any resources, as the resources are distributed based in need and not in ethnic grounds and all parts of the country should get the same institutions. You should know as that is the only thing keeping your "country" intact after 7 decades.
2 billion dollars a year in today's money is reckoned to have been transferred in the 1947-1971 period in a proper study that was done, and that comes to much more than 1% of GDP bearing in mind the much smaller BD economy in the 1950s or 1960s.
 
Last edited:
.
What part of India has much greater electricity generation do you not understand?

Which part of because of such factors, we have way different standards of urbanisation than you...do YOU not understand?

Sorry.... its not good enough for us to have BBS threshold of "if you live somewhere in some gutter area near other people in sufficient density even if you have no basic electricity, roads, hospitals, schools or whatever else....you are still urban". Just like its not good enough for us to launder inflation into real GDP to indulge in political propaganda with the illiterate sheeple...while they consume less calories and earn significantly less than they did 6 years back (by own govt studies).

So again have a good butthurt look at that NASA picture to see how your "capital city" has about the same output as our tier III and tier IV cities. @Skull and Bones @kaykay It's such a great urbanised area ;) ...it basically looks like you have to divide your urbanisation rate by 2 to correlate to Indian standards and about by 3 to correlate to Sri Lankan ones @Gibbs @Godman
 
.
What part of India has much greater electricity generation do you not understand?
Of course India will "light-up" more as it has far more street lights and other sources of light due to err.. greater electricity supply.:cheesy:

lol at this self-proclaimed "1% fiscal transfer" and somehow what BD got in return makes up for it? Your retardation knows no bounds.
BD should have got "in return" without having to transfer any resources, as the resources are distributed based in need and not in ethnic grounds and all parts of the country should get the same institutions. You should know as that is the only thing keeping your "country" intact after 7 decades.
2 billion dollars a year in today's money is reckoned to have been transferred in the 1947-1971 period in a proper study that was done, and that comes to much more than 1% of GDP bearing in mind the much smaller BD economy in the 1950s or 1960s.

So - the problem is not really how much electricity they 'generate', which may be okay. It's the effed up infrastructure that carries electricity to village people's homes. They never had rural electrification coops at the massive scale we did (certainly not when we started, in the mid-70's).

As usual the Sanghis will be trying to show 'india shining' (literally) but the rest of the world knows full well what is going on. Look at this NPR story...

What's It Like To Live Without Electricity? Ask An Indian Villager

india-energy-11_custom-2d241b7ce0ad405821669dc8bfae029272bc1a6f-s1200-c85.jpg

Without horsepower, they rely on human power: Mother and daughter-in-law Sheela and Sunita Devi shred sugarcane into feed.

Imagine living in a world with little or no light when the sun set. That's the plight of an estimated 300 million Indians — a quarter of the population, mostly the rural poor.

They're not left completely in the dark. Kerosene lamps provide light. Cow dung patties provide fuel for cooking. But these options take a toll on time and health. That's why India's prime minister is calling for global partnerships to bring green energy to the powerless millions.

The village of Sadikpur is a good place to gain an understanding of life without electricity. It's about a five-hour drive from Delhi in India's most populous state of Uttar Pradesh, in the north of the country.

The road leading to the village is lined with cow dung pies drying in the sun, a serene if jarring scene that lends a 19th-century feel.

They're made by women like Sagarwati, 30. She digs her hands deep in manure and slaps cow dung into paddies to burn as fuel to cook for her three children.

Watching mother and daughter-in-law Sheela and Sunita Devi provide the manual horse-power for their shredder, I discover that it's a village operated by hand. Their scarves dangling dangerously close to the wheel they push to move the blade that slices sugarcane into feed for animals, who are quartered steps from their door.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "exposure to indoor air pollution" as a result of smoke from burning animal or vegetable matter is estimated to cause more than a half a million premature deaths a year in India.

One study has found that India's indoor pollution contributes to disabilities and early death to a greater degree than tobacco, high blood pressure and heart attacks, says Rahul Tongia. He's a fellow with Brookings India who specializes in sustainable development and energy policy.

"It disproportionately impacts those who are indoors a lot, which is women and children," Tongia adds.

The World Health Organization says India has 154 deaths per 10,000 people from chronic respiratory diseases — the world's highest rate.

And in Sadikpur, there lack of electricity could jeopardize its future. Farmer Papu Singh, 28, says more than one family has turned down his proposal for marriage. The brooding bachelor asks, "Who wants to marry a poor man" in a place with no power?

It's not as if Sadikpur hasn't tried to get electricity. The village chief has a file spilling with petitions accumulated over the years, asking for connection to the national power grid. The requests are caught up in a complex web of government edicts, public power companies and private suppliers that is electricity in India.

The problem turns out to be one of numbers. The village falls short of the 3,000 residents required to qualify for electricity.

At the local electric company, we ask the superintendent engineer Punkaj Kumar how it can be that decades after independence a sizeable village like Sadikpur is still without power.

india-energy-12_custom-fd4c784320d2542912d6d672258b24e553c6006d-s1200-c85.jpg


Millions of Indian women shape cow dung into pies, dry them in the sun and use them as cooking fuel. This scene is on the road leading to the village of Sadikpur in the northern Indian state of Utter Pradesh.

But there's a difference between reaching a village and connecting to all its houses. The 2011 census says that just 55 percent of rural homes use electricity as the primary source of lighting. By comparison, the World Bank says 99.7 percent of Chinese homes have access to electricity.

The yawning energy shortfall in one of the world's largest electricity markets is stirring opportunity.

A group of some 200 high-profile investors convened in New Delhi this week to strategize on renewable energy for India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi told them that India needs $100 billion in green energy and is prepared to offer incentives.

Companies in attendance ranged from the U.S.-based SunEdison to the Indian conglomerate Reliance. They pledged to double India's energy capacity by adding 250,000 megawatts of sustainable green energy to the national grid over the next five years. As in the U.S., coal is India's main source of energy.

India's Minister for Power, Coal and Renewable Energy, Piyush Goyal told NPR that even if "some fraction" of the commitments does not materialize, the pledges will help reduce India's dependence on fossil fuels.

"And for the people of India, it's more power to the villages, it's more power to the common man, it's more power to the last man on the street who's been deprived of it for 67 years," Goyal says.

In the short term, small entrepreneurs are making a go of it.

"This is the place where you don't have any electricity at all," says Ananth Aravamudan, who accompanied me to the remote villages that lie in land in the southern Indian state of Karnataka that the government wants preserved as forest.

Aravamudan is with the Indian energy company Selco (Solar Electric Light Company) which has provided power solutions to 100,000 underserved households since 1994. Field staff works with local banks to make loans to poor villagers to buy Selco's $200 solar home lighting system on installments for as little as 100 rupees — $1.60 — a week.

Its founder, social entrepreneur Harish Hande, says the mission is to "eradicate poverty and the darkness" with renewable energy. He says the poor are not looking for sympathy; they are looking "for a partner."

india-energy-15_custom-e88c689f16aebd15330380ca2504b4436c391bf2-s1200-c85.jpg


Frustrated by the lack of power, farmer Dummada was the first in his village to buy into an affordable solar lighting system.

In the village of Tulasikere, women fetch water from a well as they have for centuries. A 36-year-old farmer named Dummada says "there's been no development here for the last three generations" though politicians have promised "roads, lighting and health centers."

Harish Hande says, "There is a huge potential of entrepreneurs, mathematicians, innovators, inventors that is just lurking behind darkness. So by putting that one light, we are taking the first step out of ten" toward a more equitable India.
 
.
^^ The dullard literally ignores the NASA night maps that show the reality of the evidence of LDC Beggar swamp compared to India, lol.

If its this bad in India, its literally 10 times worse in Beggar swamp delta, just remember that is what the NASA maps clearly show. So think twice before you keep cherrypicking for India ;) ...that you are a magnitude worse or more.

You really can't make this crap up, click to expand them if you want:

2012:

bdlights1-jpg.475515


2016:

bdlights2-jpg.475516


Time for billu to cry more:

New satellite imagery released Thursday by NASA shows the vast growth of Indian cities in recent years.

Huge swaths of northern India, relatively dark in 2012 night shots, are lit up by huge new urban areas in imagery from 2016. (Whereas Bangladesh remains stagnant and LDC-like for all to see, LITERALLY;) )

According to the Oxford Economics Global City Forecast, of the 20 fastest-growing cities in the 2015-19 period, fourteen are in India.

Surat, in north-western Gujarat province, is expected to grow around 10% a year until 2030, "making it the strongest growing city in our global database," according to Oxford Economics.


https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/13/asia/india-nasa-satellite-night-trnd/index.html
 
.
An Indian barber holding a candle, has a haircut for a customer at his shop in Kolkata, India.
slide_241933_1306403_free.jpg


A building is seen dark following a power outage in Kolkata, India (AP Photo/Bikas Das)
slide_241933_1306383_free.jpg


An Indian man watches as he and others wait inside a stalled train for its services to resume following a power outage in New Delhi, India (AP Photo/Rajesh Kumar Singh)
slide_241933_1306566_free.jpg


Indian stranded passengers wait for train services to resume at a railway station following a power outage in New Delhi, India (AP Photo/Rajesh Kumar Singh)
slide_241933_1306619_free.jpg


Indian stranded passengers wait on a platform and some of them on rail tracks for the train services to resume following a power outage at Sealdah station in Kolkata, India (AP Photo/Bikas Das)
slide_241933_1306690_free.jpg


A handwritten notice about power failure is pasted outside a Metro station after Delhi Metro rail services were disrupted following power outage in New Delhi, India (AP Photo/ Manish Swarup)
slide_241933_1306728_free.jpg


India’s huge need for electricity is a problem for the planet

By Annie Gowen

POWER PLAY | Cheap electricity, a changing climateThis is part of a series exploring how the world’s hunger for cheap electricity is complicating efforts to combat climate change.

India’s leaders say that the huge challenge of extending electric service to its citizens means a hard reality — that the country must continue to increase its fossil fuel consumption, at least in the near term, on a path that could mean a threefold increase in greenhouse-gas emissions by 2030, according to some estimates.

When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi talked climate change with President Obama in September at the United Nations, he was careful to note that he and Obama share “an uncompromising commitment on climate change without affecting our ability to meet the development aspirations of humanity.”

Fossil fuel generation of electricity is the largest single source of greenhouse-gas emissions worldwide. Yet demand for inexpensive power will rise in a great tide in the decades to come, especially in South Asia and sub-
Saharan Africa, the two regions of the globe with the least access to electricity. All the countries of Africa, taken together, have twice as many people without electricity as India does — 622 million. No country is content with that.

“It’s a matter of shame that 68 years after independence we have not been able to provide a basic amenity like electricity,” Piyush Goyal, India’s minister of state for power, coal and new and renewable energy, said recently.

The Indian government has launched an ambitious project to supply 24-hour power to its towns and villages by 2022 — with plans for miles of new feeder lines, infrastructure upgrades and solar microgrids for the remotest areas.

If India’s carbon emissions continue to rise, by 2040 it will overtake the United States as the world’s second-highest emitter, behind only China, according to estimates by the International Energy Agency.

Yet the Indian government has long argued that the United States and other industrialized nations bear a greater responsibility for the cumulative damage to the environment from carbon emissions than developing nations — with Modi urging “climate justice” and chiding Western nations to change their wasteful ways.

Total carbon dioxide emissions for India were 1.7 tons per capita in 2012, the most recent complete data available, compared with 6.9 tons for China and 16.3 tons for the United States, according to the World Resources Institute. Officials say they are keenly aware of India’s vulnerability to the impacts of climate change: rising sea levels, drought, flooding and food security.

Yet the government says it must depend on fossil fuels to bring an estimated 30 percent of the population out of extreme poverty.

“We cannot abandon coal,” said Jairam Ramesh, the former environment minister and climate negotiator, and author of the book “Green Signals: Ecology, Growth, and Democracy in India.” “It would be suicidal on our part to give up on coal for the next 15 to 20 years, at least, given the need.”

‘We are just surviving’
Although 300 million Indians have no access to power, millions more in the country of 1.2 billion people live with spotty supplies of electricity from the country’s unreliable power grid. The grid failed spectacularly in 2012, plunging more than 600 million people into total blackout.

In the country’s high-tech capital of Bangalore, for example, residents have recently had to endure hours of power outages each day after repairs and a bad monsoon season prevented the state’s hydroelectric and wind power plants from generating enough electricity.



A world in the dark: 1.3 billion people living in developing countries have no electricity VIEW GRAPHIC
A world in the dark: 1.3 billion people living in developing countries have no electricity
Many of the giant IT companies have their own generating systems — Infosys, for example, is building its own solar park — but small businesses and residents in rural and urban areas are suffering, said Harish Hande, the chairman of Selco-India, a social enterprise that provides solar power in Karnataka.

“How do we manage our supply and make sure we put money aside for infrastructure? If you look at the future, it’s what we need,” he said, “but there’s not a single thing that’s moving ahead.”

Estimates show that India’s power woes cost the economy anywhere from 1 to 3 percent of gross domestic product — an impediment to Modi’s hopes to expand the economy and make the country more hospitable to manufacturing, according to Rahul Tongia, a fellow with Brookings India. Electricity demand will increase sevenfold by mid-century as the population continues to grow, experts say.

Energy access is worse in rural areas. Bihar, one of India’s poorest states, has a population of 103 million, nearly a third the size of the United States. Fewer have electricity as the primary source of lighting there than in any other place in India, just over 16 percent, according to 2011 census data. Families still light their homes with kerosene lamps and cook on clay stoves with cow-dung patties or kindling.

2300-India-power-606-v4.jpg

In Bagwan village, students at the local middle school swelter in concrete classrooms without fans. A diesel generator rattles and spews black smoke outside the offices of the Union Bank of India.

“Electricity touches each and every sector of life,” said Rajesh Kumar Singh, a farmer who is the village sarpanch, akin to a mayor. “I can’t see TV properly. I can purchase an air conditioner, but I can’t run an air conditioner. Every piece of equipment that runs by electricity we can’t have. So life is not good for us. We are just surviving.”

Singh, 44, lives with his large extended family in a spacious home around an open-air courtyard where most of the cooking is done in a clay oven fueled by cow dung. He shows off his small refrigerator, which cannot be used to store food for any length of time because of the uneven electricity supply.

“I have a refrigerator, but it’s just sitting there. It’s just a showpiece,” he said, and sighed. “We are cursed to live in Bihar.”

‘Business as usual’
In Bihar, the average per-capita electricity consumption is 203 kilowatt hours per person per year, compared with about 1,000 kilowatt hours for India as a whole, about 4,000 for China and about 12,000 for the United States, according to estimates from the World Bank and India’s Central Electricity Authority.

Pratyaya Amrit, the secretary of the energy department for Bihar, said that the state is about seven to 10 years behind the rest of the country, a fact that is not lost on his constituents. His office is trying to link the last remaining 2,000 villages with power and improve conditions for 40 percent of the rest that have bad infrastructure.

“They will ask you: ‘My village. By when? Please get it done,’ ” Amrit said.

Indian officials want 100 ‘smart cities.’ Residents just want water and power.]

At the same time, the Indian government says it wants to develop its economy using green technology, setting up 100 smart cities and touting its work with energy efficiency in industrial buildings and making LED light bulbs affordable.

“Two-thirds of our buildings have yet to be built, and half of the roads and infrastructure have yet to be created,” said Samir Saran, a senior fellow and vice president at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi. “There’s an opportunity to build at least some of them right for the first time — if we can create the right financial ecosystem.”

Rescue plan
In recent months, the Indian government has announced plans to modernize its national grid and is preparing to address the financial woes of the country’s state-owned utility companies, some of which are mired in debt, to the tune of $66 billion. The rescue plan is likely to include power tariff hikes — a politically unpopular concept in a country where many residents are used to heavily subsidized power. In 2010, according to a World Bank estimate, 87 percent of all electricity consumed by domestic customers was subsidized.

In Bihar, 30 percent of power is lost to transmission and distribution as well as theft, Amrit said, although independent analysts say the number may be higher.

Dark comes quickly in Chowkipur village, a small community about two hours from Bihar’s capital of Patna. Parents pull out kerosene lanterns as soon as the sun goes down so their children can study. The young men gather on the grass to play a board game called Ludo, lighting the board with their mobile phones, which they charge for 5 rupees per hour — about 8 cents — in town.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indian officials want 100 ‘smart cities.’ Residents just want water and power.

Rama Lakshmi

AJMER, India — Ajmer’s famous 13th-century Sufi shrine draws millions of pilgrims from around the world every year. The city recently launched a new Web site called “Amazing Ajmer.” But life in this ancient city of 550,000 people in northern India is anything but amazing.

Running water is available for just two hours every two days. Only 130 of 125,000 homes in the city are connected to the sewage system. Dirty water flows in open drains in cramped neighborhoods. Stepwells and lakes have become garbage dumps. Illegal buildings and slums dot the city. And only two traffic lights work.

But soon, Ajmer could be transformed into a 21st-century “smart city” — an urban-planning term for the gleaming metropolises of the future that Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to create by 2022.

These modern marvels would be connected by grids in which water, electricity, waste removal, traffic, hospitals and schools are seamlessly integrated with information technology to run them more efficiently.

The government has set aside $7.5 billion to make it happen, and Modi officially launched the program Thursday. But it’s a grand vision that the residents of Ajmer — one of the 100 cities designated for the modernization — are not quite ready for.


Even as it becomes a buzzword, many people here are unclear about what it means to be a smart city. And others question whether Modi’s fascination with smart cities in South Korea, China and Abu Dhabi can be duplicated in India.

The ambitious project also signals a marked shift in Indian politics, analysts say. For decades, the village dominated the country’s political and economic decisions, a stubborn legacy that dates to Mahatma Gandhi’s constant refrain that “India lives in its villages.” But now the pace of urbanization is so rapid that policymakers can no longer look away.

More than 350 million Indians live in cities. According to a McKinsey Global Institute report, urban expansion will grow in the next few years “at a speed quite unlike anything India has seen before.” By 2030, more than 600 million Indians will live in crowded cities crumbling with creakyinfrastructure.

In a radical departure from the previous government’s rural focus in the past decade, Modi wants to boost cities as engines of economic growth. By 2030, officials say, 70 percent of India’s economic output is expected to come from the cities.

“Cities in the past were built on riverbanks. They are now built along highways. But in the future, they will be built based on availability of optical-fiber networks and next-generation infrastructure,” Modi said last year, shortly after taking office.

In the past eight years, the smart-cities rubric has become fashionable among global urban planners who want to use digital technology and big data to create surveillance-heavy intelligent systems that control how people live, consume energy, go to work, and stay healthy and safe.

India’s program involves radical renovation of deteriorating cities as well as constructing new municipalities from scratch, similar to a Wall Street-like financial hub called the GIFT city in Modi’s home state of Gujarat — where the progress is nowhere near its promised hype.


When Modi and President Obama met in Washington in September, U.S. companies selected three Indian cities, including Ajmer, to become smart cities. Last month, IBM, Oracle and several other companies met officials in Ajmer to discuss using smart technology to solve some of the city’s challenging water, traffic and waste problems.

“While we are trying to bring 21st-century technology, we also need to sort out some 19th-century challenges in Ajmer,” said Mukesh Aghi, president of the U.S.-India Business Council, which organized the meeting. “Basic services like sanitation, health, roads and electricity have not kept up with the pace of growth in these old cities. We can leverage smart technology to leapfrog some of these problems.”

Aghi said that the U.S. companies are considering a pilot project to install smart electricity meters that will help consumers track consumption and promote conservation on their own.

Ajmer’s residents have already posted a billboard in the heart of town declaring themselves a smart city. But many wonder whether the initiative is just an urban fantasy of technology and real estate companies that is being imposed on Ajmer.

“Can we first work toward becoming a functioning city before aspiring to be a smart city? We lack even the basic services that a city should typically provide,” said Suresh Mathur, a retired schoolteacher who runs a city cleanliness drive called “My Clean School.”

Other critics have dismissed Modi’s smart-cities plan as a 21st-century urban utopia, as a distant Neverland and Orwellian. They say that the idea is more suitable for richer nations whose citizens can afford to take basic urban services such as drinking water, toilets or electricity for granted.

“The Western definition of the smart city is spineless, if not altogether redundant in India — a mere glossing over of civic services and infrastructure,” Gautam Bhatia, an architect and author on urban design, wrote in The Hindu newspaper.

Some worry about damaging or destroying Ajmer’s famous cultural heritage.

“We can’t import a first-world concept of a smart city and plant it here. It has to be culturally appropriate,” said Onkar Singh Lakhawat, chairman of Heritage Preservation and Promotion Authority of Rajasthan.

Officials have held 22 meetings with residents in the past five months to convince them of the merits of the smart-city plan.

“Before you take part in the Olympics, you engage in warm-up exercises, build your stamina, physical fitness and change your attitude,” said Dharmendra Bhatnagar, divisional commissioner. As first steps, his office is arranging a flower show and a photography contest.

The big challenge, Aghi said, is figuring out where the funding for the program will come from. Most city corporations in India are severely cash-strapped. Modi wants Indian and foreign companies to invest in the program, but there is no estimate yet.


One idea is that private companies charge residents a fee to recover their investment. But that could be problematic. Last year, when a private company in Ajmer received a contract to collect and recycle trash, residents protested in the streets and refused to pay.

“There is a mind-set among people that the government should give everything free,” said the city’s mayor, Kamal Bakolia.

In the cramped and labyrinthine lanes leading to Ajmer’s Sufi shrine, there is plenty of chatter and jokes about Ajmer’s new designation. One pilgrim covers his nose with his scarf near an open drain and asks a resident, “When will your city become smart?”

Earlier this year, before Ajmer was chosen for smart-city status, Modi had also included it in a list of 12 “heritage cities” he planned to develop. And a few years ago, the government launched a program to make Ajmer a “slum-free city.”

“Real estate prices have shot up since all this talk of smart city began,” said Syed Munawwar Hussain, the shrine custodian. “We are a world-renowned city, but we are still waiting to become a world-class city.”
 
. .
View attachment 475736

According to this pic, BAL have given special focus on Dhaka only. That's why there is no load-shedding in Dhaka, whereas, there is not much improvement outside Dhaka.

Might also be why the overall household (real) income has dropped because of the over prioritisation on Dhaka (that has basically dumped inflation on everywhere else for little result)...this is problem with centralised development model. BD needs to hedge more with more cities given its population is 170 million....Dhaka itself is getting very congested because of it. Dhaka - CTG corridor is doing worse than Ranchi - Durgapur one (with far less population)...that is not good enough...this is where BD needs to get its act together in developing one major industrial corridor. @bluesky
 
.
Sri Lanka total: 114,093 km ,paved: 16,977 km ,unpaved: 97,116 km
Bangladesh total: 21,269 km ,paved: 2,021 km ,unpaved: 19,248 km
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2085.html
CIA factbook's data on paved road in Bangladesh is fake beyond any limit. Even Metropolitan Dhaka(306 sq.km) has 2,400 km paved road. And here it is showing entire Bangladesh has only 2021 km paved road!:sick: This is even less than what Bangladesh had in 1971.

Paved road in Bangladesh now currently stand at 120,000 km out of total 355,000 km road.

View attachment 475736

According to this pic, BAL have given special focus on Dhaka only. That's why there is no load-shedding in Dhaka, whereas, there is not much improvement outside Dhaka.
Dhaka get around 2,000 MW out of 10,000 MW electricity supplied by national grid. Very normal for a capital city which also contain 12 percent of entire population.

I have already shown that, this illumination map is wrong. According to this map, BIMARU state Bihar and Uttar Pradesh is the most illluminated part of India. Although in reality, that 2 states has the lowest household electricity connection and per capita consumption within India.

I though with homogenous population, largely single party systems and largely non mountainous area of Bangladesh made it easy to be develop? Why so small road length, and mostly unpaved ?
CIA factbooks road data for Bangladesh is horribly wrong. Bangladesh's total road network is 355,000 km out of which 120,000 km are paved.See these posts-
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/revi...rstp-2015-2035-for-greater-dhaka-area.559554/
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/a-story-of-significant-progress.479770/
Excerpt-
RHD is responsible for building national highways (12.2 metre in width), regional highways (11.0 metres) and Zila roads (7.3 metres), while LGED is responsible for Upazila roads (7.3 metres), Union roads (4.9 metres) and village roads (3.7 metres). All national highways, regional highways and nearly half of the Zila roads are bituminised and the rest are brick-soled. The total length of roads in Bangladesh today is over 354,890 km, with 3813 km of national highways, 4247 km of regional highways, 13,242 km of Zila roads (of RHD), 39,756 km of Upazila roads, 46,259 km of Union roads and 247,574 km of village roads, under LGED. On an average each of the nearly 80,000 villages has almost 4.44 km of road length and there is a kilometre of road for about 450 Bangladeshis (assuming total population being 160 million). These should be respectable figures for a lower middle income country. However, the per capita availability of bituminous roads is very low.
 
.
Paved road in Bangladesh now currently stand at 120,000 km out of total 355,000 km road.

Measured by chitty Bangladesh....under whatever standards you claim as "paved".

No one else cares about your paper-led development model....the reality is Dhaka is ranked alongside Damascus, Tripoli in liveability...."paved" roads and all.

I have already shown that, this illumination map is wrong.

Yeah RAW has hacked and controlled NASA apparently...because some BAL-worshipping swamp beggar said so :rofl: @Skies

@django @Desert Fox @Valar @Major Sam @MUSTAKSHAF Now you understand why this lot are so easy to convince about 3 million BS. They literally won't believe direct evidence shown to their pathetic faces.....they can only accept what their feelz allows for (and preferably zero evidence or as close to it as possible because that just gets in the way of the feelz).

According to this map, BIMARU state Bihar and Uttar Pradesh is the most illluminated part of India.

They happen to be the most populated parts of India too (esp density wise)....this is surprising? They are not that much more illuminated if you actually look at the full map, definitely lower on per capita level than rest of India (click to expand):

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/india-2016.jpg


Although in reality, that 2 states has the lowest household electricity connection and per capita consumption within India.

Yet NASA verifies they are doing way better than Bangladesh (even your capital city) lol. Man that sucks for you doesnt it? There goes your stupid urbanisation, electricity and paved road standards like the flooding in a Dhaka street scene ;)
 
.
Measured by chitty Bangladesh....under whatever standards you claim as "paved".

No one else cares about your paper-led development model....the reality is Dhaka is ranked alongside Damascus, Tripoli in liveability...."paved" roads and all.



Yeah RAW has hacked and controlled NASA apparently...because some BAL-worshipping swamp beggar said so :rofl: @Skies

@django @Desert Fox @Valar @Major Sam @MUSTAKSHAF Now you understand why this lot are so easy to convince about 3 million BS. They literally won't believe direct evidence shown to their pathetic faces.....they can only accept what their feelz allows for (and preferably zero evidence or as close to it as possible because that just gets in the way of the feelz).



They happen to be the most populated parts of India too (esp density wise)....this is surprising? They are not that much more illuminated if you actually look at the full map, definitely lower on per capita level than rest of India (click to expand):

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/india-2016.jpg




Yet NASA verifies they are doing way better than Bangladesh (even your capital city) lol. Man that sucks for you doesnt it? There goes your stupid urbanisation, electricity and paved road standards like the flooding in a Dhaka street scene ;)
Indeed. "Progress" is an illusion.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom