Difference of opinion should be respected and as said before same is case that due to obvious ground realities Pakistan Govt has to maintain balance.The 96% of Pak population is Muslim out of which 15% are Shia and they have key positions in Civil and Military both. On other side Sunni sect majority is obviously has tilt towards KSA.
I want to finish discussion on following points.
1- The gas pipeline project was stopped due to UN sanctions, Pakistan officially contacted with UN and USA but never got required green signal.
2-As per Iran Iraq Conflict and Pak support please read
The Bear Trap: Afghanistan's Untold Story.
3-Pakistan has stance that Yemen and Syria conflicts should be resolved through dialogue. Never sent direct force to involve in conflict despite obvious monetary benefits. Only Raheel Sharif and few others in personal role have been allowed to help KSA in defense strategies.
4-Despite clear evidence of recruitment of Shia youth in Znabya Brigade never accused Iran openly same are other matters.
5-Kulbhushan detail in wiki link given:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulbhushan_Jadhav
6-The relations between Iran and Turkey shall improve with Russian influence I am sensing it and the block is not for military only but overall common interests.
7-Pak and Iran have much to cooperate in case of Military at least at technical level i.e Iran can provide technical help in case of SAM/Radar development and rebuild of old Attack Helicopters. Meanwhile Pak can help in armor, improvement in sensors especially related to fighter jets and even in case of Naval assets.
In the end Sectarian based policies are basis for rift and conflicts sooner Iran and KSA learn better it is or ultimate destruction is waiting in near future.
Please enlighten me about role of Iran in Bosnian war, never heard bout it.
(Ghaza is almost destroyed by Israel and no Muslim nation even condemns Israel, meanwhile in the past Hiszbollah is accused of sectarian violence in Lebanon.)