What's new

ULFA urges Dhaka to 'stop crackdown’

Status
Not open for further replies.
These are all argument for argument's sake,not argument leading to exposing that RAW was involved.

How do you actually perceive that these arguments stand a chance??

1.IC-814 was hijacked from Kathmandu, than landed at Amritsar, Lahore, Dubai and finally landed at Kandhahar---So RAW must be involved...

2.Their initial demand was release of 35 Islamic militants and ransom of about $ 200 million to the Indian authorities.---so RAW must be involved.

3.Indian govt released only three militants and what about the money(ransom)---So RAW must be involved...

Let me ask you,is there any hard and fast rule for hostage negotiation,any common pattern,upon which your claim is based??

4. Not a single passengers were killed only one injured(died later)---So RAW must be involved...

Would you liked to have some more killed so that it might have seemed not an involvement of RAW???
How do you even think that this claim stands??Okay...what is the normal number of people that should get killed during a hijack??

5.The hijackers were in save heaven than why the militants were so liberal ?--So RAW must be involved...

Just think about what you are saying.The hijackers are bargaining on the basis of the hostages.Do you possibly think killing those very hostages will increase their bargaining potential???What was they looking for afterall?Killing some hostages or freeing the terrorists??

All that you have said does not show that RAW was involved.You have just assumed that.Where is the direct link??

The truth about the Ganga hijacking By Khalid Hasan

It is thirty-two years since the Indian Airlines flight that had taken off from Srinagar on the morning of January 30 for Delhi was hijacked and brought to Lahore by two young Kashmiris cousins, Hashim and Ashraf Qureshi. The official Pakistani story has been that the Ganga hijacking was elaborately planned by Indian intelligence to be used as an excuse to ban Pakistani aircraft flying over India in order to keep its beleaguered garrison from being supplied. Hashim and Ashraf were denounced as Indian agents, although when they brought the plane to Lahore they were greeted as heroes and freedom fighters. On a popular level they continued to be seen like.

I was at the time a reporter working for The Pakistan Times and just happened to be at Lahore airport when the plane landed. In the first few days, there was no bar to us walking across the tarmac and talking to the two hijackers. Later, however, our access was blocked. I was also present when Zulfikar Ali Bhutto arrived from Dhaka. A crowd had gathered at the airport. And many among them had jumped over the railing to greet the PPP leader. I was already on the tarmac. They wanted Bhutto to go towards Ganga. Bhutto said to me, “Look, I don’t know what this is all about and who these people are, so I won’t say anything.” He was practically pushed towards the parked aircraft by the crowd. He exchanged a few words with the two young men.

The late Aftab Ahmed Khan was then head of the India desk at the Foreign Office and had remained in Lahore throughout the episode. He also briefed the press where we subjected him to some hard questioning. Years later in London I asked him about Ganga. He said it had been set on fire by the ISI. On the day that happened, he told me, he was disallowed access to the plane. Even the West Pakistan chief secretary, Afzal Agha, a Srinagar Kashmiri, could not get through. Both Hashim and Ashraf were later tried and sentenced, the special court having found them to have been “Indian agents”.

My cousin KH Khurshid appeared as a witness in that case. His testimony which I saw for the first time a few days ago sheds new light on this strange event and separates truth from the falsehood in which it has so far been kept wrapped by the Pakistani establishment. Khurshid, who was personal secretary to the Quaid-e-Azam from June 1944 until the Quaid’s death in 1948, told the court that he had arrived at the airport on February 2, 1971, at about 7.00pm having been told that the situation was tense and that PIA had stopped its daily supply of food to the hijackers.

The late Jammu and Kashmir National Liberation Front (JKNLF) leader Maqbul Butt arrived in Lahore from Peshawar. Muslehuddin, who was working for PTV News, and I were the first people to meet him and we briefed him about the situation. We also helped arrange his press conference at the Hotel International. The hijackers Hashim and Ashraf had asked to meet Butt. Sardar Abdul Vakil Khan, the SSP of Lahore, took Khurshid and Maqbul to a room where Hashim sat with some officials. He told Butt that “these men” were telling him to set fire to the plane. Butt said that would be unwise.

As Khurshid and Maqbul were being escorted out, the SSP said, “ Khuda ke liye hamari jaan chhorh do, jahaz ko urha do” [For God’s sake spare us and destroy the plane]. And that is what happened, but not at the hands of the hijackers.

After the destruction of Ganga, the two hijackers were taken away. In the next few days, Maqbul and the entire leadership of JKNLF was arrested and tried for “treason”. All these brave and innocent men remained in jail for two years and were finally released by the Lahore High Court which called them “patriots fighting for the liberation of their motherland”. However, Hashim was not released until 1980 and only after he won his appeal in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

While Ashraf stayed on in Pakistan, Hashim settled in Europe. He returned to India a couple of years ago and was arrested for the 1971 hijacking. What kind of an “agent” then was Hashim Qureshi who was jailed by both India and Pakistan?

In my view, it establishes that he was a Kashmiri patriot. The theory that India arranged the hijacking because it wanted to ban Pakistani over-flights makes no sense as India could have banned the over-flights anyway by merely saying that the Yahya regime was ferrying troops and arms to crush the people of East Pakistan – which it was - and India did not wish to be party to it.

Hashim had crossed into Pakistan a couple of years earlier and met Maqbul. When he was crossing back, he was picked up, interrogated and released. One Indian account says he “confessed” that he had been trained by Pakistan to hijack an Indian plane and agreed to become a double, another story that makes no sense. You don’t need “training” to hijack a Dakota, just a toy gun which is what the two cousins had when they hijacked Ganga. Another **** and bull story floated by MB Sinha, a former Indian intelligence officer, in a book said that Hashim agreed to “hijack” an Indian plane to Pakistan, befriending Maqbul Butt and infiltrating JKNLF.

This is absolute nonsense because the total JKNLF cadre could be counted on the fingers of one hand. If that was all India wanted, it could simply have sent an agent or two to Pakistan instead of getting one of its own planes hijacked. According to Sinha’s book, Hashim was instructed not to hand over control of the plane to Pakistan but to insist that he would only do so if Bhutto came to meet him and his comrade. This, says, the author with a rather rich imagination, was to establish his credibility with “his Pakistani masters and help India at the same time”. This is another ridiculous claim because first, Hashim never made any such demand and second, Bhutto’s meeting the hijackers was accidental. Sinha goes on to say that Hashim was instructed to blow up the plane after meeting Bhutto, which is utter rubbish because the plane was blown up not by Hashim, who had no means of doing so, but by the ISI.

In April 2001, Hashim Qureshi wrote to a Jammu newspaper after it published a fanciful article about the Ganga hijacking that he was and remained a Kashmiri patriot working for an independent Kashmir. He quoted KH Khurshid in his defence. Why did Yahya’s military destroy the plane? Because by then it had decided to jettison East Pakistan and also because it was inept beyond belief with some very strange notions.

Hashim, who has since been released, has turned pacifist but he still believes that Kashmir should be independent of both India and Pakistan, a position no patriotic Kashmiri differs with. It is time Kashmir stopped being treated as a choice piece of real estate by the two states.

This entry was posted on Friday, April 11th, 2003 at 8:44 am .

Was the hijack staged
Pakistan has consistently alleged that this hijack was staged by Indian intelligence agencies. Soon after the hijack, India banned all Pakistani flights over its airspace. This meant that the distance between West and East Pakistan became three times the orginal distance and thus made it more difficult for Pakistan to transfer resources from West to East. It may have played its part in the overall outcome of the war.


The aircraft was hijacked by two Kashmiris, Butt and Hashim Quereshi. One of them was a Border Security Force man. What made the affair curious was the fact that Ganga was one of the oldest aircraft in the Indian Airline fleet and was already withdrawn from service but was re-inducted days before the 'hijack'. Even more tellingly, a deputy inspector general of the BSF based in Jammu, bristling at the involvement of one of his men in hijack, had gone public to say that he had objected to the induction of Butt into the BSF but was overruled by a 'higher intelligence agency'. (Source)

Conclusion
From the prima facie , it does appears that the hijack was staged by Indian intelligence agencies. In hindsight it appears to be clever plan that worked perfectly. Though there are some unanswered questions. Like why was Quereshi arrested by Indians when he returned back to India.
 
Last edited:
.
^^ Did you actually read that piece or you just stopped reading after you reached that portion which you have highlighted in red. Here is an excerpt from that piece only:

'In my view, it establishes that he was a Kashmiri patriot. The theory that India arranged the hijacking because it wanted to ban Pakistani over-flights makes no sense as India could have banned the over-flights anyway by merely saying that the Yahya regime was ferrying troops and arms to crush the people of East Pakistan – which it was - and India did not wish to be party to it. '

The author further says:

'This is absolute nonsense because the total JKNLF cadre could be counted on the fingers of one hand. If that was all India wanted, it could simply have sent an agent or two to Pakistan instead of getting one of its own planes hijacked. '

Pathetic.
 
.
^^ Did you actually read that piece or you just stopped reading after you reached that portion which you have highlighted in red. Here is an excerpt from that piece only:

'In my view, it establishes that he was a Kashmiri patriot. The theory that India arranged the hijacking because it wanted to ban Pakistani over-flights makes no sense as India could have banned the over-flights anyway by merely saying that the Yahya regime was ferrying troops and arms to crush the people of East Pakistan – which it was - and India did not wish to be party to it. '

The author further says:

'This is absolute nonsense because the total JKNLF cadre could be counted on the fingers of one hand. If that was all India wanted, it could simply have sent an agent or two to Pakistan instead of getting one of its own planes hijacked. '

Pathetic.

Rediff Blogs
 
.
^^ Did you actually read that piece or you just stopped reading after you reached that portion which you have highlighted in red. Here is an excerpt from that piece only:

'In my view, it establishes that he was a Kashmiri patriot. The theory that India arranged the hijacking because it wanted to ban Pakistani over-flights makes no sense as India could have banned the over-flights anyway by merely saying that the Yahya regime was ferrying troops and arms to crush the people of East Pakistan – which it was - and India did not wish to be party to it. '

The author further says:

'This is absolute nonsense because the total JKNLF cadre could be counted on the fingers of one hand. If that was all India wanted, it could simply have sent an agent or two to Pakistan instead of getting one of its own planes hijacked. '

Pathetic.

Is Indian RAW Agent S.B.S. Tomar Behind the Hijacking Drama?

Names of Passengers and Crew on Board Hijacked Indian Airlines Plane

By Syed Adeeb

WASHINGTON, DC, USA, December 28, 1999 (PNS): Pakistan Television (PTV) and Pakistan's Foreign Ministry Spokesman Tariq Alt af have disclosed that S.B.S. Tomar, an agent of India's infamous intelligence agency, Research & Analysis Wing (RAW), is also on board the hijacked Indian Airlines plane and he is guiding, directing and controlling the five or six hijackers.

PTV reported on Tuesday, December 28, 1999 that "According to sources, the RAW agent aboard the hijacked plane is S.B.S. Tomar who is holding the cover post of First Secretary in the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu, Nepal. According to information, this very RAW agent is controlling the entire operation from inside the plane."

"I have just now been told by a reliable source that an Indian RAW agent is on board the aircraft," Pakistan's Foreign Office Spokesman Tariq Altaf told reporters during a news briefing held on Monday, December 27, 1999 in Islamabad. Later, Tariq Altaf told journalists that the name of the Indian RAW spy is: "S.B.S. Tomar."

S.B.S. Tomar, the name of the Indian RAW agent, is definitely on the list of the names of passengers and crew on board hijacked Indian Airlines Flight No. IC-814, which was scheduled to fly from Kathmandu, Nepal to New Delhi, India.

Indian Airlines flight schedule from Kathmandu to New Delhi for Friday, December 24, 1999 was as follows: Flight No. IC 814 (Airbus 300) Departs Kathmandu at 1350, Arrives in New Delhi at 1510 - (Non-Stop Daily Flight - 7 Days a Week) - J-Class Fare = $170, Y-Class Fare = $142.

Indian Airlines Flight IC-814 was hijacked from Indian airspace on Friday, December 24, 1999 and taken to Lahore, Pakistan (permission to land not granted); Amritsar, India (First Stop); Lahore, Pakistan (Second Stop); Afghanistan (permission to land not granted); Dubai, United Arab Emirates (Third Stop); and Kandahar, Afghanistan (Fourth Stop), where Indian negotiators tried to cut a deal with the hijackers.

Indian Airlines official logo reads: "a perfect take-off". Following is the name list of Indian Airlines Flight IC-814, which includes 178 passengers, including five infants, and 11 crew members (For some reason, the name of Mr. S. Kumar appears twice in the Indian Airlines Flight IC-814 list of passengers and crew):

PASSENGERS
1. AGARWAL/A MR 2. AGGARWAL/A MRS 3.
AGGARWAL/G MR 4. AGGARWAL/S MR 5.
AHUJA/R MR 6. ARORA/H MR 7. ARORA/ MRS 8.
BAISLA/A MS 9. BAISLA/G MS 10. BAISLA/K MS
11. BAISLA/P MAS 12. BANSAL/P MRS 13.
BANSAL/SK MR 14. BARARA/S 15. BHAT/UB 16.
BHATT/J MR 17. BHATTACHARYA /A K MR 18.
BHATTACHARYA /S DR 19. BHOJWANI/B MR 20.
CALABRESIA 21. CHAPAGAIN/N P MR 22.
CHHABRA/CP MR 23. DAHALI/R D MR 24.
DAWAR/M MS 25. DHANASEKAR/S MR 26.
DHITAL/S MR 27. DOGRA/R MR 28. DUBEY/K
MAST 29. DUBEY/S MR 30. DUBEY/S MRS 31.
GANGAHAR/A MS 32. GANGAHAR/N MRS 33.
GARG/P 34. GARG/R MS 35. GARG/S MRS 36.
GHOSH/R K MR 37. GIORI/R MR 38. GOEPERT/D
MRS 39. GOEPERT/G MR 40. GOEL/D MR 41.
GOEL/S MRS 42. GROVER/A MR 43. GROVER/R
44. GROVER/V MRS 45. GUPTA/ASHOK 46.
GUPTA/ATUL 47. GUPTA/L N MR 48. GUPTA/A
MRS 49. GUPTA/S MRS 50. GUPTA/S MR 51.
GUPTA/H MRS 52. GUPTA/A MRS 53. GUPTA/V
MR 54. GURU/K MR 55. HISADA/C MS 56. JAIN/A
MR 57. JAIN/A MR 58. JAIN/A MS 59. JAIN/A MS 60.
JAIN/AP MR 61. JAIN/S MRS 62. JAMES/F MR 63.
JONSHAN/D MR 64. JOSHI/A DR 65. KACHROO/R
MR 66. KALRA/P 67. KALRA/S MRS 68. KALRA/
MR 69. KANNAN/K 70. KANNAN/RP MR 71.
KAPOOR/S MR 72. KAR/S MR 73. KATARIA/P MRS
74. KATARIA/R MR 75. KATHURIA/AA MR 76.
KATYAL/R MR (Killed by Hijackers) 77. KATYAL/R
MRS 78. KAUR/R MRS 79. KAUR/Y MS 80. KC/B
DR 81. KHANDELWALA/ MR 82. KHARWADKAR/
83. KHURANA/A 84. KOUL/K MAST 85. KOUL/U
MRS 86. KULASEKAR/R 87. KUMAR/A MR 88.
KUMAR/A MRS 89. KUMAR/D MR 90. KUMAR/R MR
91. KUMAR/RAVI MR 92. KUMAR/S MR 93.
KUMAR/S MR 94. LLORET/A MRS 95.
MACHEREL/G MRS 96. MACKLIAN/S MS 97.
MAHESH/N MR 98. MAHESH/N MS 99.
MAHESHWARI/H MS 100. MAHESHWARI/M MAST
101. MAHESHWARI/ MR 102. MAHESHWARI/ MRS
+ INF 103. MASOCH/M MR 104. MAYORAL/J MR
105. MEENU/K MRS 106. MENON/V MR 107.
MENON/ MRS 108. MISTRI/ZI MR 109. MORE/V R
MS 110. MORENO V V MS 111. MUSTAQ AHMED/
MR 112. NAITHANI/A MR 113. NAIDHANI/A MRS
114. NAIDHANI/B MR 115. NAIDHANI/K MS 116.
NAIDHANI/R MR 117. NAIDHANI/S MRS 118.
NEENA/ MRS + INF 119. PARTHASARATHI/R MR
120. PATHAK/R MS 121. PERUMAL/B MR 122.
PRASADBABU/G MR 123. QAZI/SA 124.
RAGHAV/R CAPT 125. RAGHAV/S MS 126.
RODRIGUEZ/FC MRS 127. SAHANI/S MR 128.
SAYYED/SA MR 129. SETHI/A MR 130. SETHI/S
MR 131. SHARMA 132. SHARMA/AA MR 133.
SHARMA/A MR 134. SHARMA/KK MRS 135.
SHARMA/K MS 136. SHARMA/M MR 137.
SHARMA/RK MR 138. SHARMA/S MR 139.
SHARMA/S MAST 140. SHARMA/S MAST 141.
SHARMA/S MRS 142. SHARMA/V MR 143.
SHRESTHA/H MRS 144. SHRESTHA/JL MR 145.
SHRESTHA/S MRS 146. SINGH/D MR 147.
SINGH/IQBAL MR 148. SINGH/R MRS 149.
SINGH/RP MR 150. SINGH/S MR 151. SINGH/V MR
152. SINGH/V MR 153. SINGOTIA/S MRS 154.
SINGOTIA/S MR 155. SONI/D K MR 156.
SWARUP/A MR 157. TAMRAKAR/G MR 158.
TANDON/BK MR 159. TANEJA/I MR 160.
TAYAL/RK MR 161. TOLIA/M MRS 162.
TOMAR/SBS MR 163. TULASI/M MR 164.
TYAGI/CM MR 165. TYAGI/G MR 166. TYAGI/P
MRS + INF 167. VERMA/I MRS + INF 168. VERMA/
MRS 169. VERMA/RG MR 170. VERMA/S 171.
VOHRA/R MR 172. VOHRA/ MRS + INF 173.
VOUGLA F MRS 174. WARD/P MR

CREW
1. SHARAN D CAPT 2. RAJINDER CAPT 3. JAGGIA
FLIGHT ENGR

CABIN CREW
4. SHARMA ANIL F/P 5. SATISH F/P 6. RAJANI A/H
7. SABITA A/H 8. MUKHERJEE A/H 9. DEBNATH
A/H 10. MAZUMDAR A/H 11. MENON A/H

Names of Passengers Released by Hijackers of Indian Airlines Flight IC-814 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates:
1. Dr. B. K. TANDON 2. Mr. R. P. SINGH 3. Ms.
SHAKTI VOHRA 4. ADITYA VOHRA (Infant) 5. Ms.
INDU VERMA 6. SHAURYA VERMA (Child) 7. URVI
VERMA (Infant) 8. Ms. USHA KAUL 9. KARAN KAUL
(Child) 10. Ms. NEENA KUMARI 11. SIMRANJEET
KAUR (Child) 12. Ms. BHAVNA DUBEY 13.
SAMAKSH (Child) 14. KSHITIJ (Child) 15. Ms.
SEEMA JAIN 16. ARUSHI (Child) 17. AAKANSHA
(Child) 18. Ms. GEETA BAISLA 19. PRASHANT
BAISLA 20. KRITI BAISLA 21. AAKANKSHA BAISLA
22. Mr. SATNAM SINGH 23. Ms. PUJA TYAGI 24.
VISHAL TYAGI (Infant) 25. Ms. NAMRATA
GANGAHAR 26. Ms. KASTURI 27. ASHI
GANGAHAR (Child) 28. ANIL KHURANA (Released
by the hijackers in Kandahar, Afghanistan)

"One dead body identified as Mr. Rupin Katyal has also been handed over," the Indian Airlines says.

Source: INDIAN AIRLINES
 
.
Absence of evidence does not boil down to the conclusion that any security agency that you may think of is involved in any particular incident.

Pakistan News Service, December 28, 1999

RAW agent on board seized Airbus, says FO__Indian HC phone lines not disconnected : FP

ISLAMABAD - Foreign office spokesman Tariq Altaf Monday claimed that a RAW agent was aboard the hijacked Indian airlines now stranded at the Kandahar airport.

"A reliable source just informed us that "RAW agent was on aboard the aircraft you can make your own conclusions," said the foreign office spokesman at a news briefing here on Monday. The spokesman refused to give any detail about the disclosure, saying "the identity of the RAW agent would be made public in due course of time." There is a considered opinion among the officials circles here that India has engineered the hijacking drama in order to defame Pakistan's new leadership, especially in the context of expected visit of President Clinton to South Asia, Tariq Altaf added.

"Now as Pakistan seems to have moved in the direction of signing the CTBT, the New Delhi is set about raising new "phantoms of terrorism" by the so-called Islamic fundamentalists in order to sabotage the possibility that Clinton might come to Pakistan as well," he maintained. Asked to comment on some of the information and statements attributed to the hijackers, the spokesman said "nobody knows who are the hijackers, their demands and identity are so far a mystery and no one can say anything with certainty."

Tariq Altaf said Pakistan had no sympathy with any desperate individual's act. "We condemn terrorism no matter what nationalities of the hijackers are." The spokesman said Indian government Monday had requested for an overfly of an airbus on its way to Kandahar which was immediately given. "So far, according to our information, the Indian plane has not yet left New Delhi."

On Sunday also, he said, the Indian authorities had sought permission for the overfly of an airbus with a capacity of 179 passengers. He said the Indian government had informed that the aircraft would enter into Pak territory at 1215 hours and exit at Zhob on its way to Kandahar. "Surprisingly no Indian aircraft went to Kandahar," he informed. On the other hand, he said, Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee Sunday said that his country had not requested for overflying.

Tariq Altaf said Pakistan was deeply concerned over the increasing tense situation developing in Kandahar. He expressed full sympathy on behalf of government of Pakistan with the sad plight of the hostages of the plane.

"The government of India appears to be least active," he said, adding the Afghan government had publicly invited Indian government to send its delegation to resolve the crisis. The United Nations had sent its delegation to Kandahar but Indian government did not give it negotiating mandate, he regretted.

Responding to a question about the reports that Russia had called for a meeting of the UN Security Council on the issue, Tariq Altaf said," we hope the Security Council will call on India to immediately send a delegation to Kandahar and resolve crisis." The spokesman regretted that India has unleashed a vilification campaign against Pakistan instead of making efforts for the release of hostages. "They are trying to establish some sort of nexus between Pakistan, Afghan government and so-called Islamic fundamentalism." He said the hijacking of the plane seemed to be the part of Indian ploy to malign Pakistan. Meanwhile, a spokesman of Foreign office in a statement on Monday took a strong exception to the Indian Media's report that the telephone lines of the Indian High Commission in Islamabad have been cut by the authorities.

The Spokesman said, " malicious lie on the Indian media is that the telephone lines of the Indian High Commission in Islamabad have been cut by the authorities. This is completely false, indeed ridiculous. The lines are intact," he added. He said the latest twist to the Indian canard of Pakistan's involvement in the Indian Airlines plane's hijacking is the announcement by the Indian media of the names of four so-called Pakistani nationals.

"Curiously the Indian media which has regularly announced the number of the people of various
nationalities on board the aircraft has in the last four days never mentioned the presence of any Pakistani among them."

The Indian media is also alleging that the delay caused by the Pakistani authorities in granting over-flight permission to the Indian aircraft headed to Kandahar resulted in the cancellation of the flight.

This is a false allegation. A verbal Indian request for flight clearance was received on telephone at noon. The flight clearance was immediately granted. Subsequently, the Indians sent a written request as required by the rules including the necessary particulars two hours later to which a written permission was granted immediately", the statement added.
 
.
Dear nForce & Abir,

I request you please donnot ask any more querry to me on this matter. What I read, what I got I posted hear. Wheather there was RAW's involvement or not I donnot know.

" Char nare bhai char,bhool kore bhai ashe chilam amra gacher tule, taina bole, hetai ashe emon gadhao ache".

Regards.
 
.
They are given their fare share of water. Period. There is a whole set rules which covers different amount of water-flow during different time of year. Any diversion from the treaty amounts to crime punishable by International court.


Farakka is very important for West Bengal.

I agree with you Abir.I know that KPT has to be shut down in absence of Farakka dam.I am neither denying the treaty,nor should any responsible and educated Bangladeshi.

What I am trying to point out is this dam has become a symbol for tension.You know about the treaty,I know about the treaty,many others know about the treaty,but many common people on the both side of the border don't.Hence it has been misused for political games.
When water volume in a particular year becomes low,then Bangladesh complains about choking the river,while in reality both the sides are suffering equally.You see,it is Government of West Bengal which is controlling the dam,not the Bangladeshi people.Hence it is always Bangladesh which complains.

I would personally like to see a Joint-Observation Committee comprising people both from West Bengal and Bangladesh in order to avoid mistrust,confusion and misinformation.
 
.
New clues on IA airbus hijacking emerge
BY OUR POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT

Interesting new light is now being shed on the eight-day Indian Airline Airbus hijack drama following the return of the Nepalese hostages on board the ill-fated IC 814 flight.

Among them is that connected with the defamatory charge by ZEE News that Nepali national Gajendra Man Tamrakar, a passenger and later hostage on flight IC 814 that took off from Kathmandu on December 24 for Delhi, is a terrorist and smuggler.

Although it has now conclusively proven that Tamrakar was himself merely a hostage in the Christmas Eve-New Year's Eve hijacking episode -- and ZEE News has since shown clips indicating that Tamrakar is innocent -- what is significant is that ZEE News has attributed the source of its "news" to the government of India.

That, according to news/political analysts, clearly suggests that the whole nasty smear campaign against Nepal and her portrayal as a haven for terrorists, particularly of the ISI brand, was the handmaiden of Indian officials, presumably those connected with its super-intelligence outfit, RAW!

What that means in practical terms is that rather than focusing on the supposed inaccuracies or bias of the Indian media in the hijack incident, one must rather zero in on Indian officialdom which, as is well known, has been trying assiduously over the years to position Nepal squarely under India's security umbrella, a la Bhutan.

It is in that connection that the screaming silence of the Indian media in reporting that SBS Tomar, first secretary (political) at the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu, was a passenger assumes great and obvious significance.

As much is made plain as Tomar's name has been indicated as a passenger on flight 814 on December 24 by none other than Indian Airlines and in view of the serious charge by an official Pakistani spokesman in Islamabad (vide last week's issue) that Tomar, allegedly a RAW agent, was masterminding the hijack operation.

Also revealing is the disclosure of Nepalese passengers/hostages that at a relatively relaxed point in the hijack drama they were permitted to indulge in "antakchhari" popularized by an Indian TV musical game show and which is avidly watched by many in Nepal.

Given that disclosure, astute observers in Kathmandu presume that the hijackers were none other than Indians although they are fully aware that the government of India has alleged that they are Pakistani/Afghan nationals.

What lends further credence to such speculation is that, according to the disclosure of Roshan Bikram Dahal, published in The Kathmandu Post in a front page news item on January 3, "the hijackers used to address each other by nicknames like Doctor, Burger, Shankar, Bhola and Chief." Attention may in particular be drawn to the names Shankar and Bhola which are patently Hindu names (both are used to signify Lord Shiva).

That apart it is also meaningful, say analysts, that according to disclosures of the Nepalese passengers/hostages who have returned home, the hijackers spoke mainly in Hindi and sometimes in English, again suggesting that they were Indians, not Pakistanis or Afghans.



Excerpts from "India increases pressure for PM's visit", People's Review,
January 13-19, 2000:

BY OUR DIPLOMATIC CORRESPONDENT

While the full, authenticated facts of the Christmas Eve hijacking of an Indian Airline airbus remain as murky as ever -- despite the propaganda barrage unleashed by India -- one thing appears incontrovertible: that New Delhi is putting pressure on Prime Minister Krishna Prasad Bhattarai to pack his bags and make an official trip to India soon.

.....

Indeed, it is meaningful, India-watchers here say, that Indian Ambassador K.V. Rajan attempted at an abruptly called interaction programme with the media the other day, courtesy the Reporters' Club, to cool down frayed Nepalese tempers by regretting Indian media reports on the hijacking -- reports that were tantamount to a smear campaign against this country.

.....

The interest of the government of India in having Bhattarai over to, among other things, get him to agree to a host of security-related understandings and agreements -- written and unwritten -- is crystal clear. Despite or perhaps because of that there is a groundswell of enlightened opinion here that is against an official visit by the prime minister to India at a time when Indian officialdom has repeatedly and publicly voiced claims that India's security is being threatened from Nepalese soil, particularly and allegedly from Pakistan's intelligence agency, the ISI.

It is also being pointed out that while India has been crying herself hoarse over Pakistan's alleged involvement in the hijack incident, no other government on earth has -- thus far, at least -- backed the Indian claim.

Indeed, if one were to go by claims alone, one should then accept Islamabad's charge that the hijacking was a "stage-managed" affair designed to "prove" that Pakistan is a terrorist state.

The bottom line thus is that an official visit by the prime minister to India at such a time is not only inappropriate but could be suicidal as far as preserving this country's independence and sovereignty is concerned.



People's Review, January 6-12, 2000
Pakistan denies allegations

BY OUR REPORTER

Pakistan has denied Indian allegations of her involvement in recent Indian Airlines aircraft hijack. In a statement of the Foreign Office Spokesman of Pakistan, it is stated that without a shred of evidence, the Indian External Affairs Minister has made a new allegation against Pakistan.

"Earlier the Indian Airlines published the list of passengers aboard the hijacked plane. It did not include any Pakistan nationals. The baseless allegation now can only expose India's prejudice and malevolence not to mention ingratitude for the cooperation of authorities extended throughout the hijacking crisis," it is stated in the statement.

"We did everything possible to ensure the safety of the hostages aboard the hijacked plane during its unwelcome stay at Lahore airport. Mr. Jaswant Singh expressed gratitude to our Foreign Minister," it is said.

The Indian officials reportedly conducted the negotiations through specialized communication equipment, which they had flown to Kandahar. If the officials obtained some particulars about the hijackers, these have not been disclosed to facilitate identification, the statement reads. "No one else listened to dialogue between the Indians and the hijackers".

"The Indian Minister did not desist even from attributing a false statement to the Information Minister of Afghanistan. The latter has clarified that he did not say that the hijackers had left Afghanistan for Quetta in Pakistan".

Pakistan Government issued immediate instruction of all immigration checkpoints in the provinces of Balohistan and NWFP on December 31 when the hijacking ended, to arrest persons bearing the names of hijackers announced by the Indian Government if they sought entry into Pakistan, it is said.

So far no such person has presented himself at any of the checkpoints in Pakistan, it is claimed. "Those who suggest Pakistan should arrest hijackers make the naive assumption that the hijackers have entered Pakistan. To the best of our information, such an assumption is unwarranted," it is stated.

"The Indian Government has so far given no details as to the profile of the hijackers. In the absence of such details, it would be unauthorized route. Nevertheless, our authorities will maintain strict vigilance and make utmost efforts to arrest and investigate persons who look suspicious," the statement reveals. The Government is cognizant of its obligations under the ICAO conventions. Due action will be taken in case the hijackers come into its custody, it is said.



People's Review, Feb 3-9, 2000
RAW official on hijacked flight IC 814: Asiaweek

BY OUR POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT

A stunning new bit of information on the Indian Airlines airbus hijacking on December 24 has surfaced in the Intelligence column of Asiaweek in its January 21, 2000 issue.

In an item entitled "Another Reason Not to Attack", the Hong-Kong based news weekly says that, according to an unidentified source in New Delhi, an "undisclosed reason" why no attack was ordered on the hijacked aircraft in Amritsar was because the brother-in-law of N.K. Singh, "the senior-most bureaucrat in India's Prime Minister's Office" was on the plane. (See also editorial).

Interestingly, the brother-in-law has been identified in the said Asiaweek item as "Shashi Bhushan Singh" who it then goes on to disclose is "a senior police officer assigned to India's premier counterintelligence organization, the Research and Analysis Wing." (RAW). Even more revealingly, Asiaweek adds that Shashi Bhushan Singh "was working -- apparently under cover -- in the Indian embassy in Kathmandu, where the hijackers initially boarded the plane on December 24."

The Asiaweek revelation recalls the charge made by the spokesman of Pakistan's foreign ministry in the early days of the hijack drama (vide People's Review, December 30-January 5 issue) that a RAW agent, identified as "SBS Tomar", first secretary in the Indian embassy in Kathmandu, was masterminding the hijack operation.

As indicated in our earlier report on the subject, SBS Tomar was also shown on the passenger manifest of Indian Airlines flight IC-814 in the immediate aftermath of the hijacking.

Against the backdrop of the Asiaweek revelation, what is striking is that there has, thus far, not only been no official contradiction that a Kathmandu-based Indian diplomat was on board flight IC-814 on December 24 but that no mention at all has been made of the Pakistani allegation in the saturation coverage of the hijacking in the Indian media.

What lends another intriguing dimension to the whole nasty business of the hijacking is that Tomar's initials "SBS" coincides with the name "Shashi Bhushan Singh"!

Follows below the full text of said Asiaweek item:

"Another Reason Not to Attack"

"A source close to the family of N.K. Singh, the senior-most bureaucrat in India's Prime Minister's Office, says an undisclosed reason that PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee's advisers did not order an attack on the hijacked Indian Airlines Airbus in Amritsar was because Singh's brother-in-law, Shashi Bhushan Singh, was on the plane. The Singh family isn't talking publicly, but Shashi Singh is a senior police officer assigned to India's premier counterintelligence organization, the Research and Analysis Wing. He was working -- apparently under cover -- in the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu, where the hijackers initially boarded the plane on December 24."
 
.
Nepal dismisses Indian charges : FP

KATHMANDU (Agencies) - Nepal Foreign Minister Ram Sharan Mahat said Monday good security was maintained at the international airport where a hijacked Indian Airlines jet began its flight. He also told a press conference some of the hostages onboard the plane included family members of Kathandu-based Indian diplomats.

"Our security arrangements are as good as those of any of the international airports," he said, adding however, an investigation had been ordered. Mahat also denied the four Pakistani hijackers boarded the Indian Airlines flight directly after arriving on a flight from Pakistan.

"We deny that the hijackers boarded the IA-814 flight directly at the Kathmandu airport from the PIA (Pakistan International Airways) aircraft. We would not believe this unless it is confirmed by the investigation team," he said.

Two of the Nepalese hostages were from the UNDP offices in Kathmandu and Islamabad, Mahat said. An Indian diplomatic source in Kathmandu gave the names of the hijackers as Ahmed Sheikh, S.A. Qazi, Ibrahim Mistry, Sayed Akhtar Sayed, all Pakistanis, and Gajendra Man Tamrakar, a Nepali. Mahat denied any Nepali citizen was involved. Islamabad also expressed surprise over the latest twist in the Indian propaganda against Pakistan. It said first New Delhi-released list did not include names of any Pakistanis on board the hijacked plane.



Pakistan News Service, January 25, 2000

Nepal finds no Pakistan link to hijack

KATHMANDU (FP) - An investigation into the hijacking of an Indian Airlines jet from here on Christmas Eve has found no evidence to back allegations the Pakistani secret service was involved, Nepalese sources close to the inquiry said Monday.

"The probe has failed to collect any solid proof of involvement by the ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) in the hijacking," one investigation source said. But the head of the five-member investigation committee, Hem Bahadur Singh, declined to comment to reporters on whether the ISI was involved.

"We have wrapped up the security and other matters in the report," said Singh, a former police inspector general.

In a 64-page document to Civil Aviation and Tourism Minister Vijaya Kumar Gachheddar, the investigators recommended the government beef up security at Tribhuvan International Airport, where the hijacking started.

"After presenting the report to the cabinet on Thursday, I will reveal the gist of the contents of the investigations made by the special five-man committee," Singh said. The eight-day hijack drama, which began when five men seized the flight from Nepal to New Delhi, ended News Year's Eve at Kandahar airport in southern Afghanistan.
 
.
India managed the present government in Bangladesh to sign most of the treaties detrimental to the sovereignity of Bangladesh. The Chittagong Hilltracts treaty between Santu Larma and Sheikh Hasina brokered by India is a loss of one tenth of the land of Bangladesh to India. The 30 years Farakka agreement between Hasina and India without gurantee clause and arbitration presence is a permanent loss of the share of the Ganges water resources.

India, due to her nacked neighbouring policy shamelessly occupied the newly emerged Talpatti land of Bangladesh in the Bay of Bengal; is a great threat to the existence of Bangladesh and not opening the Tin Bigha corridor to Bangladesh nationals while Sheikh Mujib handed over Berubari in 1974 to satisfy the Indians. The present political termoil and disburbance in the economic development of Bangladesh is an organised plan of Indian diplomacy. India cannot be trusted.
 
.
I agree with you Abir.I know that KPT has to be shut down in absence of Farakka dam.I am neither denying the treaty,nor should any responsible and educated Bangladeshi.

What I am trying to point out is this dam has become a symbol for tension.You know about the treaty,I know about the treaty,many others know about the treaty,but many common people on the both side of the border don't.Hence it has been misused for political games.
When water volume in a particular year becomes low,then Bangladesh complains about choking the river,while in reality both the sides are suffering equally.You see,it is Government of West Bengal which is controlling the dam,not the Bangladeshi people.Hence it is always Bangladesh which complains.

I would personally like to see a Joint-Observation Committee comprising people both from West Bengal and Bangladesh in order to avoid mistrust,confusion and misinformation.

There should have been more PR from India about Farakka but these conspiracy theorists will anyway find more imagined issues to vent their frustration!

Heck I even saw people blaming India of stealing Bangladeshi fish!

There is a domestic niche audience for them in Bangladesh I reckon. India is good scapegoat for both of her Western and Eastern neighbours!

Relation between West and East part of Bengal always been dependent on who of the two Ladies is on the helm of Bangladesh
 
.
Excerpt from "Bangladesh: An Unfinished Indian Agenda" By G.H. Niaz

In 1975 three helicopters carrying four Indian Generals landed in Dacca, their mission "To escort Mujib-ur-Rehman to Delhi for installation as Vice President of India". Mrs. Indra Gandhi had decided for annexation of Bangladesh, but this mission proved abortive. On this very same day middle ranking officers of Bangladesh Army removed Mujib-ur-Rehman for his pro-Indian crimes, Indian helicopters were burned and charred bodies of four Indian Generals were quietly sent to India.

Khandokar Mustaque Ahmed who took over the charge hushed up this Indian affair. Unfortunately few people in Pakistan and Bangladesh are aware of this incident. Within next three months Brig Khaled Musharaf a known Indian agent led a coup which also proved to be abortive with General Zia-ur-Rehman taking over. Mrs. Gandhi got frustrated and ordered RAW to assassinate the new Bangladesh leader.
 
.
Excerpt from "Bangladesh: An Unfinished Indian Agenda" By G.H. Niaz

In 1975 three helicopters carrying four Indian Generals landed in Dacca, their mission "To escort Mujib-ur-Rehman to Delhi for installation as Vice President of India". Mrs. Indra Gandhi had decided for annexation of Bangladesh, but this mission proved abortive. On this very same day middle ranking officers of Bangladesh Army removed Mujib-ur-Rehman for his pro-Indian crimes, Indian helicopters were burned and charred bodies of four Indian Generals were quietly sent to India.

Khandokar Mustaque Ahmed who took over the charge hushed up this Indian affair. Unfortunately few people in Pakistan and Bangladesh are aware of this incident. Within next three months Brig Khaled Musharaf a known Indian agent led a coup which also proved to be abortive with General Zia-ur-Rehman taking over. Mrs. Gandhi got frustrated and ordered RAW to assassinate the new Bangladesh leader.

Tell the folks who have written these stuffs to contact ABP group in Kol, they are in need of good fiction writers.
 
.
@Al-zakir

You have given a solid proof that the Indian NE wants independence from the colonialist India, specially from the Calcutta Babus. These Hindu Babus also colonized over the Muslim Bangalis for 190 years by borrowing strength from their white British masters. These Babus were given right medicine in 1947 when the muslims took away a big chunk of land to form a separate country.

India, the champion of independence as claimed by many posters, should immediately vacate NE and Kashmir. Kashmir must be ruled by Pakistan. Shame on India for occupying NE land which is not rightfully India's. And shame on Awami League traitors who broke a muslim tradition and handed over NE leadership who took shelter in this country.

I can tell one thing. By this traitorous act, AL has sown the seed of a bigger poison tree in Assam. It is more possible that now ULFA will redouble its fight to break out of Union of India.

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction - this is what Newton stated.

lol :rofl: :wave: :D Come to India and see the reality and pls dont bring religion in to everything :cheers:
 
.
Another conspiracy theorist? Is Bangladesh also full of them? I had a good opinion of BD before, nowadays I am beginning to think it is just a small version of Pakistan!

You are right my dear friend !:victory::victory::victory::chilli::chilli::bounce::bounce::bounce:

"Ager ham apki bhool ko akhome ongli de kar dekhai tu ham mini pakistan bangai, thik hai wohi sai".
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom