What's new

U.S. Hyper-Sonic Missile (Mach 20) Loaded On B-52

. .
It's just a test, which China has tested for many times in past decades.
Wait until you made one, far from it.

From the video, I can see it's just another ballistic missile, not even a glider, nor wave rider.

Show you a true glider, watch and learn. This is called hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV). Yours are just propaganda to fool those has no technical background.
1608173219390.png
 

Attachments

  • 1608172893215.png
    1608172893215.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 53
Last edited:
.
It's just a test, which China has tested for many times in past decades.
Wait until you made one, far from it.

From the video, I can see it's just another ballistic missile, not even a glider, nor wave rider.

Show you a true glider, watch and learn. This is called hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV). Yours are just propaganda to fool those has no technical background.
View attachment 697097

The ARRW HGV is inside the nosecone of the missile. It’s a wedge shaped HGV.


Roper: The ARRW Hypersonic Missile Better Option for USAF


And let me know when China has successfully tested a 4000km Mach 17 HGV that can strike within 6 inches of the target.:lol:
 
.
The ARRW HGV is inside the nosecone of the missile. It’s a wedge shaped HGV.


Roper: The ARRW Hypersonic Missile Better Option for USAF


And let me know when China has successfully tested a 4000km Mach 17 HGV that can strike within 6 inches of the target.:lol:
That's bull$hit. There isn't any HGV can be accurate as 6 inch, no need neither. Only fools believe that kind of bull$hit, purely propaganda.
 
.
And the Chinese morons thought they led the world in hypersonic weapons development.
 
.
And the Chinese morons thought they led the world in hypersonic weapons development.

They never did. China’s hypersonic solution is less advanced, which is why they could deploy earlier. It’s a “good enough” approach. US hypersonics require extreme precision, so it’s taken longer to advance.
 
.
They never did. China’s hypersonic solution is less advanced, which is why they could deploy earlier. It’s a “good enough” approach. US hypersonics require extreme precision, so it’s taken longer to advance.
China hyper-sonic is safe to say 5-10 years ahead of US.
 
.
That's bull$hit. There isn't any HGV can be accurate as 6 inch, no need neither. Only fools believe that kind of bull$hit, purely propaganda.
You doubt that the U.S. can achieve such accuracy?:what:

Its not needed? I mean I guess it depends on the situation. Accuracy helps.
TELEMMGLPICT000196574924_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqmC6NzUL7te5kQMAZIWGBput9nUk1H7v6_BKIaSlv1w.jpeg
 
.
You doubt that the U.S. can achieve such accuracy?:what:

Its not needed? I mean I guess it depends on the situation. Accuracy helps.
TELEMMGLPICT000196574924_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqmC6NzUL7te5kQMAZIWGBput9nUk1H7v6_BKIaSlv1w.jpeg
So you want to use hyper-sonic for killing one man?
I can see you don't have much tech background, the faster you fly, the harder you maneuver.

There is no way you can be as accurate as 6 inch while still flying at 17-20 mach.

So far all HGV(including China, Russia and US) will have to slow down to maneuver, no exception.

6 inch accuracy need 1-2 mach. 3+ mach is quit difficult to maneuver.

Faster than 5 will create a lot of trouble for radar, infrared sensor for terminal guidance.

I am kind of wasting my time, you guys relies on CNN, Fox and youtube for military tech.
 
. .
So you want to use hyper-sonic for killing one man?
I can see you don't have much tech background, the faster you fly, the harder you maneuver.

There is no way you can be as accurate as 6 inch while still flying at 17-20 mach.

So far all HGV(including China, Russia and US) will have to slow down to maneuver, no exception.

6 inch accuracy need 1-2 mach. 3+ mach is quit difficult to maneuver.

Faster than 5 will create a lot of trouble for radar, infrared sensor for terminal guidance.

I am kind of wasting my time, you guys relies on CNN, Fox and youtube for military tech.
Sure why not kill one man? The U.S. sent a squadron of fighters to kill an admiral during WW2. They even thought of a Global Strike weapon to kill the terrorists from half way around the world.

So you are saying China's and Russia's weapons have to slow down under mach 3 to hit their targets? Even China's ASBMs?
 
.
Hypersonic HAWC Won’t Fly This Year Due to Ongoing Test Problems

This missile is not ARRW, and the missile just delayed testing, it never launched. This is a hypersonic air breathing cruise missile, not HGV. During development its common to have hiccups along the way. Thats normal.
China hyper-sonic is safe to say 5-10 years ahead of US.

Again, let me know when China has an ICBM ranged HGV capability that can strike within 6in of its target. Because the US does.....
 
.
It seems to be similar to Russia's Kinzhal hypersonic air launched ballistic missile.

Again, let me know when China has an ICBM ranged HGV capability that can strike within 6in of its target. Because the US does.....

6 inches? More like 0.0001 inches. Just like US's claim F-22 has RCS of a fly, it's a fake. F-22 has bigger RCS than F-15 in reality.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom