ChineseToTheBone
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Messages
- 199
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Amazing job! Thank you for your great work.This is my CG
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Amazing job! Thank you for your great work.This is my CG
But where is the IRBM threat to China? I suppose India, but the China has land based missiles for that.
.
nice 055, so huge, the completion is looking good for first ship, look like already able to sea trial,
hopefully can get side view...
Say
22 YJ18
16 YU8
32 HQ19
26 CJ10
32X4 HQ26
The most awesome fire power on the planet!
效费比太低,没必要。布置在青藏高原的远火旅或者东十旅就能承担同样的任务,且火力强度会大很多。更重要的是这些火力打击单元完全处在我空军的保护范围之内。
Who got the bigger ball ? Who is the real man?What Sonar system does it used? Why isthe sooner hull is far more smaller than those US' DDG??
Dude, Standard-6 could intercept ICBM with its max height of 600km.
So the logic of armament development of PLA, we should get what the US has owned or been developing
Now, China develops technologies for the sake of technology advancement, not only for any imminent threat.
Where's IRBM threat coming from? 055 will be used anywhere in the world whenver situations arise, which could be any.
So China can stop developing High Speed Rail now, cuz where is the railway threat to China?
India threat? Please, do not insult Chinese intelligence.
Apparently, you know little about China millitary.No it can't. Even Raytheon don't claim that. It has only ever been tested against MRBMs, not even IRBMs.
In my humble opinion, that isn't a great logic. And I'm not sure it is followed by the PLA.
Each country has its own specific military requirements because each country has its own likely military threats.
The US is an interventionist power, therefore it requires a weapon for basically everything. Hence it needs a ship based ABM to intercept ballistic missiles fielded by many of its opponents like Iran and China.
That doesn't hold water for me. If you want to advance your military technology for future (but not current or foreseeable) threats, you set up an advanced research program. That's why the US has DARPA.
Anywhere around the world? But China is not an interventionist power. China's primary area of concern is South China Sea and maybe the pacific. In none of these theatres does China face a TBM/MRBM threat. Unless, as I've already asked, China considers continuing South Korean BM development or India's BM program a threat.
What has high speed rail got to do with the anti-ballistic missile capabilities of China's new DDG?
More to the point, what is a "railway threat"?
So then where's the threat that requires ship based ABM?
Apparently, you know little about China millitary.
I overtly point out that China is developing the ABM to counter the threat from US.
That doesn't hold water for me. If you want to advance your military technology for future (but not current or foreseeable) threats, you set up an advanced research program. That's why the US has DARPA.
Anywhere around the world? But China is not an interventionist power. China's primary area of concern is South China Sea and maybe the pacific. In none of these theatres does China face a TBM/MRBM threat. Unless, as I've already asked, China considers continuing South Korean BM development or India's BM program a threat.
What has high speed rail got to do with the anti-ballistic missile capabilities of China's new DDG?
More to the point, what is a "railway threat"?
So then where's the threat that requires ship based ABM?
Yes. It is obvious that the main rivalry of PLAN is US navy.So you think China is developing a naval ABM to counter US ICBMs?