What's new

Two Years of Balakot Lies: Our Punitive Response


We shot down your MIG and then you tried to hit back by shooting down our unarmed Navy Atlantic plane.

So you guys have a habit of losing your planes to us.
IAF MIG was shot down during the Kargil war and the Atlantic shootdown happed after 1.5 months after the formal withdrawal of Pakistani forces ..get your facts correct
 
.
lol kulbhushan is a businessman kidnapped from iran by your forces . we will get him released .

but abhinandan was a pilot who was chasing attackers ,

we were ready to attack that night had you not released him before deadline . your generals knew it .
Pakistan sent in PAF's strike packages into Indian territory which struck bombs and created craters at unpopulated areas and later PAF shot down 2 IAF aircrafts. Both these actions by PAF could have started a war so although Pakistan was exercising restraint yet took all the actions despite knowing that there are high chances of a war starting anytime. If India had the guts to retaliate to PAF strike, then India wouldn't be giving excuses and showing ARMRAAM to international media, instead India would have started a war. Abhinandan's capture was used as excuse by India to show they "freed" him from Pakistan's clutches thus earning an iota of glory in all this facade that was lost from very start by India.

So now that its understood that both countries knew that the war could start before Abhinandan's capture, what stupid logic is releasing him before an assumed threatened deadline or God knows what will happen.
 
.
IAF MIG was shot down during the Kargil war and the Atlantic shootdown happed after 1.5 months after the formal withdrawal of Pakistani forces ..get your facts correct

exactly you tried to take revenge after the war was over. typical indian tactics.

and attacked unarmed target. so typical
 
.
after our surgical strike with 12 fighter planes bombing balakot madarsa , pakistan was taught the lesson , we were ready to an all out attack on that night on pakistan if our pilot was not returned .
India didn't start a war on 40 fallen soldiers, so India will start a war over 1 pilot ?
 
.
The single most critical aspect of the Balakot strike was that "A Certain message was delivered to the concerned party and message was well received"

Message!? For 2 years afterwards India still accused Pakistan of supporting cross border fighters, and there was absolutely no discernable change in Pakistan policy to India. What exactly was the "message", or do we file this claim in the same file as

"300 dead"
"F-16 shot down"
"12 Privthi missiles made us hand back Abhi"


More BS....
 
.
Message!? For 2 years afterwards India still accused Pakistan of supporting cross border fighters, and there was absolutely no discernable change in Pakistan policy to India. What exactly was the "message", or do we file this claim in the same file as

"300 dead"
"F-16 shot down"
"12 Privthi missiles made us hand back Abhi"


More BS....
why would India stop any of its propaganda against pakistan? it will do all it takes to keep Pakistan on its toes, engaged and reactionary ...

I see Indian action similar to a magician, .. it created a diversion before pulling out the actual trick on 5th August next year.. Pakistan was so full with what happened on 27th Feb that, they didn't see what was coming on August 2019 ..
 
.
why would India stop any of its propaganda against pakistan? it will do all it takes to keep Pakistan on its toes, engaged and reactionary ...

I see Indian action similar to a magician, .. it created a diversion before pulling out the actual trick on 5th August next year.. Pakistan was so full with what happened on 27th Feb that, they didn't see what was coming on August 2019 ..

Pakistan and the world know it is propaganda, it is not even subtle or convincing, and whats more, your "reaction" did much to destroy the little remaining credibility of Indian Media in global eyes, which actually makes it easier for Pakistan to win any PR battle. That is how stupid you folks are.

Leads to global headlines like the below






 
.
Pakistan and the world know it is propaganda, it is not even subtle or convincing, and whats more, your "reaction" did much to destroy the little remaining credibility of Indian Media in global eyes, which actually makes it easier for Pakistan to win any PR battle. That is how stupid you folks are.

Leads to global headlines like the below






do you want me to pull out may be couple of thousand news articles citing Pakistan as the home to terror organizations or supporting kashmiri terrorist ? This is an information war and Indian narrative is easily galloped by the west and the world.. Pakistan is trying to fight back but you guys are much behind in shaping the narrative ..
 
.
do you want me to pull out may be couple of thousand news articles citing Pakistan as the home to terror organizations or supporting kashmiri terrorist ? This is an information war and Indian narrative is easily galloped by the west and the world.. Pakistan is trying to fight back but you guys are much behind in shaping the narrative ..


No, every western source sites India as being the largest hub of fake news in the world.

Pakistan news sources are actually considered more reliable. So in effect, the policy of claiming black is white and white is black, is actually self defeating. The more you do it, the more credibility you lose. Unlike in India, western standards evidence based reporting are much higher. Read the below and I will leave this and your pathetic responses. No need to give you and your fake news more oxygen

India has more fake news than anywhere else in the world, report says

 
.
No, every western source sites India as being the largest hub of fake news in the world.

Pakistan news sources are actually considered more reliable. So in effect, the policy of claiming black is white and white is black, is actually self defeating. The more you do it, the more credibility you lose. Unlike in India, western standards evidence based reporting are much higher. Read the below and I will leave this and your pathetic responses. No need to give you and your fake news more oxygen

India has more fake news than anywhere else in the world, report says

Did you ever wonder why Pakistani narrative Kashmir is hardly heard in the west ? because the narrator has zero credibility .. that is the single line answer for all your global position
 
.
View attachment 720485Simple question to any Pakistani who dares to answer.

If there was no damage to Madrassa complex in Balakot, and all the GPS guided bombs (which are pre fed with target co-ordinates of facility even before the aircraft takes off.) overshot their targets and fell in the forest few hundred meters away from their targets.

Because apparently "PAF scared the IAF aircrafts into releasing their bombs early and turn tail.

Apparently releasing the bombs early causes them to overshoot their target instead of falling short ( that is Pakistani logic here.)

What took Pakistan 45 days to even allow journalists near Balakot facility( in the mean time Reuter journalists were driven away from Balakot facility by Pakistan army ?

Even when on guided tour by Pakistani army 45 days after bombing, the journalists were not allowed into the building, which IAF claimed it targeted..why?

Why hasn't India released pictures of the craters created by the Pakistani SOW attack on their brigade headquarters to show how poor the Pakistani targeting capabilities were .

Isn't attacking or attempting to attack military assets of a nation an act if war ?

Why didn't India retaliate against the Pakistan SOW attack?
 
.
Did you ever wonder why Pakistani narrative Kashmir is hardly heard in the west ? because the narrator has zero credibility .. that is the single line answer for all your global position
Then why is India smoking from every hole as Pakistan raised the issue in Geneva and now feeling even more conticipated with a dose from OIC.

 
.
"Punative response "
@Saudang
A great title...
Which raises the question.

Why didn't India retaliate after the Pakistani SOW attack which was an act of war by any definition?

No nation in the world with such a large air force would have tolerated such a violation of its airspace and attack and not retaliated ,
 
.
Did you ever wonder why Pakistani narrative Kashmir is hardly heard in the west ? because the narrator has zero credibility .. that is the single line answer for all your global position

Unsure if anything you or Indian press says is true. Officially largest spreaders of fake news globally, you parrot the Indian line, so technically, all you do is spread fake news on here.
 
.
If the Balakot incident had really targeted the madrassa and resulted in the deaths of children, I would assure you that General Bipin Rawat and his military leadership, who were present at the brigade headquarters, would not have been spared.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom