Screambowl
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 8,167
- Reaction score
- -39
- Country
- Location
If you're talking about the concept of 'tawalla', it's a Shia thing - majority of Muslims is Sunni, we don't have that.
I don't want to get into a religious debate, since all I'll be doing is repeating the same points over and over again and going in circles.
I'll make only one point here: All of you trying to prove that Islam is violent, what do you think you'll achieve if you succeed? You're saying the same thing as the terrorists are, and the majority of Muslims very strongly disagree with them ,whether you believe it or not
You say Muslims should 'reform' themselves to be more peaceful or whatever, but when we show you that all that's needed is some simple reasoning and Islam is perfectly peaceful if that reasoning is followed, you people argue and argue and argue to try and prove that Islam is barbaric or whatever. It's utterly and completely pointless.
First of all I am not trying to prove Islam is violent.
I have asked some very good questions and receiving very awkward answers like .. comparing mecca to museum , pentagon, some official government. and ver bad reasoning for stopping non Muslims to see Kabah. Stampede, Visa regulations.
Why don't you simply accept that Saudi Arabia believes in Muslim Ummah, their rules are according to the BOOK, and so does every muslim
and no Muslim will want a non Muslim to enter Mecca because non Muslims like Hindus are not pak as Muslims.
I quoted Tawalla to be explained by you to prove that, the firmness of rules are weak. Shia's are not restricted to only 5 Pillars. As argued by @Akheilos