What's new

Turkish Politics & Internal Affairs

Do you agree with what I wrote?

  • I agree

    Votes: 5 38.5%
  • I agree but,....

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • I don't agree

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 5 38.5%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Not much, but we have very popular ones, including Tomris Khatun, who led her army and defeated Persian armies in central asia and defended her lands :P

There was Jeanne D'arc too. :p: :cheesy:

Bro, really ???

How many women did you saw as the head of general staff ??? Or How many women generals you have seen in the world history ? Many of the defense ministers of the European countries are female and i refuse to believe that this is a coincidence.

Many women over the world were named defence ministers. India has recently named (again) a woman as MoD. However,I agree with you that if the goal is naming women defence ministers to push 'feminist' and 'equality' agendas,then that is just entire BS.
 
.
Bro, really ???

How many women did you saw as the head of general staff ??? Or How many women generals you have seen in the world history ? Many of the defense ministers of the European countries are female and i refuse to believe that this is a coincidence.
I was just joking, it was a stupid joke sry bro, however they might just as well be as qualified as our defense minister since they are all politicians, not soldiers.

Another point is Europe is largely tending towards pacifism compared to Turkey because they have a strong economy and soft power while no armed conflicts in close proximity, Military doesnt have a as important role in politics as in Turkey because they have more options than us when it comes to dealing with conflicts in FP.

Bottom point is In Turkey someone from military as Defence minister might make sense but for Europe its not necessary at all which is probably the reason for so many female ministers.

All this a side im pretty sure the European countries wouldnt be where they are now if they had elected incompetent people to those positions, at least compared to Turkey they have less problems with competency of their politicians.

PS: im also against selecting people to positions just for their genders.

He is right you know man's nature and woman's are different no matter how many equality stories you spread.
I believe in equal rights and opportunities but i never claimed that man and women are equal, this is not possible from biological point of view.
Dont know which equality stories i have spread but i dont need to know everything anyways.
 
.
I was just joking, it was a stupid joke sry bro, however they might just as well be as qualified as our defense minister since they are all politicians, not soldiers.

Another point is Europe is largely tending towards pacifism compared to Turkey because they have a strong economy and soft power while no armed conflicts in close proximity, Military doesnt have a as important role in politics as in Turkey because they have more options than us when it comes to dealing with conflicts in FP.

Bottom point is In Turkey someone from military as Defence minister might make sense but for Europe its not necessary at all which is probably the reason for so many female ministers.

All this a side im pretty sure the European countries wouldnt be where they are now if they had elected incompetent people to those positions, at least compared to Turkey they have less problems with competency of their politicians.

PS: im also against selecting people to positions just for their genders.


I believe in equal rights and opportunities but i never claimed that man and women are equal, this is not possible from biological point of view.
Dont know which equality stories i have spread but i dont need to know everything anyways.
I didn't accuse you for anything I was just talking about SWJ mentality.
 
. . . . .
How weak Turkey in reality is shows your conflict with the Kurds... your nation is not able to end it... not in a military way and not in a peacefull way...

The conflict with the PKK is not just a national conflict. Turkey can not end this without the support or cooperation from Syria, Iran and Irak. Turkey always was able to deal with kurdish seperatist riots in Turkey, although Turkey has a much bigger kurdish population than eny of this states.
But the whole PKK scenario is something else. This terror organsation was not able to defend just one Hill in 40 years of fight against Turkey, but they have their bases in Syria, Iran and Irak... To end the PKK on military level, Turkey needs to operate in these countries. Not just for a few days, or few weeks, but probably for a few jears. And then, their would be still european media claiming Turkey would attack "kurds" and not fighting the PKK. Also Europe and USA are supporting kurdish seperatism, not to give the Kurds their promised land, but to let them fight and to destabilize middle eastern countries. They supported the PKK always but it was never done officialy, until the ISIS crisis started. They will still led the Kurds down, when it comes to estabilish a Kurdish National State, just for Kurds to suffer and join radical groups again and again.
The strategy is letting the fight continue and ensure that nobody can win it.

I dont think that Syria, Iran and Irak also had or have any interest in ending Turkey-PKK conflict. Because I think Turkey, Syrian, Irak and Iran also support kurdish seperatism movement, against each other. So for Turkey their is need to invade these states, to end the conflict with the PKK and this is just not realistic.
 
. . .
We stand 100% with Turkey on this matter

Sometimes it is best to take a break for 5-10 years till political climate changes no point to invite folks who drop weapons for Terrorist from C130

Refugee crisis created in Syria 100% US fault from their weaponization of rouge group

Only people who should be allowed in people over age 60 coming in for cultural exchange


No need we dont want none of your type in the US.... all a bunch of damn terrorists ans sympthiZers
 
.
Erdogan rejects ‘moderate Islam’ as a Western tool to weaken Muslims

5a063f76fc7e93591d8b4567.jpg


The idea of ‘moderate Islam’ was invented by the West and is being used to weaken the ancient religion, Turkey’s President Recep Erdogan has said in reference to Saudi Arabia’s reforms, while also lashing out at the EU’s “discrimination” of Muslims.

Last month, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, vowed to restore “moderate” Islam to the kingdom considered to be "home" of the religion. The Gulf monarchy currently follows a Salafist or Wahhabi version of Islam that is often described as being "ultraconservative" and administered through Islamic Sharia law. In what appears to be a direct reference to Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince, Erdogan denounced a “moderate” interpretation of Islam in a speech delivered at the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Women’s Advisory Council on Friday.

The term ‘moderate Islam’ is being lathered up again. The patent of moderate Islam belongs to the West. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam; Islam is one. The aim of using such terms is to weaken Islam,” Erdogan said in Ankara.

“Perhaps the person voicing this concept thinks it belongs to him. No, it does not belong to you,” he added, recalling, that he was “asked about ‘moderate Islam’ at meetings in the European Parliament many years ago.”

The thrust of Prince Mohammed bin Salman's Vision 2030, is to socially transform the Wahhabi brand of Sunni Islam, which bans gender mixing, concerts and cinemas. Starting in the summer of next year, women in Saudi Arabia will be permitted to drive. In the new year, women would also be allowed to attend sporting events as the monarchy continues to usher in its liberalization reforms.

Last month the Prince unveiled a plan to construct a $500-billion state of the art city across its borders into Jordan and Egypt. The new mega-city is to be erected with the aim of diversifying the Arab country’s economy and reducing its dependency on oil.
 
.
there is no difference between Islam and moderate Islam .moderate Islam is equal to changing Islamic teachings and trying to prove orders and rules of ALLAH ALMIGHTY ALONE wrong and
deficient which is unlslamic as only ALLAH ALMIGHTY ALONE IS most perfect of all and we humans are not perfect and have very less knowledge
 
.
Just to be clear, in the UE, you have this logic...

Moderate/Good Muslim = One who drink, don't pray and do not have a beard... ( and in option, one who can insult his religion, for the sake of freedom of speech)

Have Fun...

Ps: ANd if someone tells you that it's not what Moderate/good muslim def in UE is...but it's that he should not kill non-believers and explode himself... Just tell him to f*ck off... it's a just a pr*ck who can't distinghuish a Terro from a Muslim...

And if by any chance, he tells you that Terro is part of Islam, so therefore there is a problem with your religion... just answer that TO THIS DAY... Conquistadors ARE prayised by the Holy Church... And ISIS compared to them is ANgelic...
 
.
we are constantly asked this deliberate stupid questions what about secularism ? usury enslavement?
rich vs poor?, moral degradation? or lets talk about false flag operation?, crisis actors?, operation gladio? infiltration of Muslim countries although western countries have been enslaved infiltrated long time ago.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom