What's new

Turkish Peace Operations in Syria (Operation Olive Branch) Updates & Discussions

Again post evidence or stfu

We are not in court. I haven't any evidence, just like you don't have any. But I'm using simple logic, and there is no chance that the PKK has lost that many fighters.

So the numbers your defense ministry releases should be taken with a mountain of salt. They are published to influence simple minded Turks like you in order to masquerade the failure in Eastern Turkey and Northern Syria.
 
Who the fk are the commanders of this operation? They must retire immediately. Why are they so fkd up in the heads? Why they dont think about the mothers of our soldiers? They dont take any measures about the security of our soldiers. The TURKISH ARMY with so many technological and technical resourses have the power to conquere whole Syria in less than 4 months the second biggest army in NATO. What the fk is going on? Cant you put some radars to detect ATGM nests and snipers and then destroy them with guided rockets/bombs? Put 2 UAVS in the skies and 2 in reserve. Put some acoustic detectors to detect snipers and send the coordinates. Put 4 look not 40 I said 4 attack helicopters in use and give them hell. Instead our tanks and vehicles DONT EVEN HAVE CAGE ARMOR WITH KNOWN INCREASED ATGM THREAT!??!?!?! WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO TELL TO THEIR MOTHERS WHEN THEY ASKED HOW IT HAPPENED? "We were able to prevent all of this but we are oldchool guys you know.... and we live in 1950 and dont even want to put optics on your sons rifles. Yeah". SORRY FOR THE DISRESPECT BUT YOU DISRESPECT MY NATION.
 
The TURKISH ARMY with so many technological and technical resourses have the power to conquere whole Syria in less than 4 months the second biggest army in NATO.

No, you can't. That is the whole issue. Your army hasn't fought a real war near its own borders for almost 100 year. The Syrian army has exposed the weaknesses of the Turkish army when it comes to this kind of fighting. Its performance hasn't been any better than the performances of the Iraqi army post-2014.
 
I didn't exaggerate that.

The Turco-Persian wars were won by the Persians
The Ottoman-Safavid war wasn't won by any party, and both empires lost and won certain battles (losing a battle isn't losing a war).
Go back to your beloved Wiki and read carefully. There are Gokturk and Ottoman victories in wars not just battles. Then come back and apologize to everyone on this thread for exaggerating.
 
No, you can't. That is the whole issue. Your army hasn't fought a real war near its own borders for almost 100 year. The Syrian army has exposed the weaknesses of the Turkish army when it comes to this kind of fighting. Its performance hasn't been any better than the performances of the Iraqi army post-2014.
Turkish army is ready. The problem is the commanders of the turkish army. Dont you ever question the power of the turkish army.
 
Aamaq (IS) statement:

- IS captured 2 tanks & bulldozer
- TSK/ES death toll is at 70+ following 3rd suicide attack after they fled to Azraq
 
C0R0TAjXcAArMNb.jpg
 
Aamaq (IS) statement:

- IS captured 2 tanks & bulldozer
- TSK/ES death toll is at 70+ following 3rd suicide attack after they fled to Azraq
What is your problem? You want to proof that the turkish army is incompetent? Stop disrespect our martyrs in this way. If you want to tell us the casualties if you want we can meet in Turkey and I will take you for 1 month to one of our martyrs family you can talk to them in this way.
 
What is your problem? You want to proof that the turkish army is incompetent? Stop disrespect our martyrs in this way. If you want to tell us the casualties if you want we can meet in Turkey and I will take you for 1 month to one of our martyrs family you can talk to them in this way.
He is Iranian - they think they are always enlightening humanity.
 

Read the article. It was mainly between Byzantines and Persians, in which Turks served as a proxy. They attacked Persian allies only, and it was the Byzantine army which captured Georgia from the Sassanids.

You lost two wars when the fighting was between Turks and Persians only:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Perso-Turkic_War
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Perso-Turkic_War


So now the Safavids were Persian? I thought they were Turks?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman–Safavid_War_(1603–18)[/quote][/QUOTE]
 
Read the article. It was mainly between Byzantines and Persians, in which Turks served as a proxy. They attacked Persian allies only, and it was the Byzantine army which captured Georgia from the Sassanids.

You lost two wars when the fighting was between Turks and Persians only:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Perso-Turkic_War
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Perso-Turkic_War



So now the Safavids were Persian? I thought they were Turks?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman–Safavid_War_(1603–18)
You F'n smartarse! Apologize! You got wrecked!
 
What is your problem? You want to proof that the turkish army is incompetent? Stop disrespect our martyrs in this way. If you want to tell us the casualties if you want we can meet in Turkey and I will take you for 1 month to one of our martyrs family you can talk to them in this way.

Where did I disrespect your martyrs? I
 
Where did I disrespect your martyrs? I
The way you are talking about the casualties of the turkish army and the waay you want to exagerate this and in one way try to lie about this is disrespectfull. I will say it again but in more direct manner. If you have the courage to talk in this manner and serve information to the families of our martyrs in this way then you can talk what you want here but if you dont then dont talk anymore and leave the thread you are giving only more pain in our hearts.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom