what
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2010
- Messages
- 2,848
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I'm getting old.It's CGI.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm getting old.It's CGI.
They dont want to scare some countries, once they are done, they will order moreto bad its only 4 vessels.
They dont want to scare some countries, once they are done, they will order more
We thank the Greek prime minister's special efforts. Nothing is better than a hard tension on Sea, for Navy's upcoming projects.STM says istif class will be get set sea this year they are working hard because of greek odds
unfortunately none!What fighter jets turkish navy inducts in their Spanish LPD which they previously try to induct F 35 which jet can replace them
Any future plansunfortunately none!
We need a Ship-Class that can be slotted in inbetween Istif and TF-2000 Destroyer.
4 Istif will replace aged Yavuz Frigates, 6 Burak Class corvettes are getting old and will not be able to serve for a longer time (10+ years) and 8 OHP will be replaced (if possible financially) with 7 TF-2000 Destroyers. Which means the Fleet is going to shrink which we can't afford and as an counter we actually need to enlargen the fleet with new incoming threats and hostilities in the Easter Med. Talking about large surface vessels the fleet will look something like this in 2035+ if we ignore obvious blockades and delays.
7 TF-2000 AAW (Multi-Role?)Destroyers
4 Barbaros Multi-Role Frigates MLU
4 Istif Light Multi-Role Frigates
4 Ada ASW Corvettes
19 Ships
2020 (Present)
8 OHP AAW Frigates
4 Barbaros Multi-Role Frigates
4 Yavuz Multi-Role Frigates
6 Burak ASW Corvettes
4 Ada ASW Corvettes
26 Ships
7 fewer ships for the navy isnt good and with budget contrains we could even see the number of TF-2000 go down to 5 or even 4 which would mean the Navy would be left with 16-17 Ships to protect our coasts and our interests/assets in the open sea and still perform our NATO duties as we have been doing for the last 70 years. This new class could be a cheaper alternative but still with enough firepower to be a force projection on its own in the Aegan and East Med. The menpower used for the Burak Corvettes could be shifted over to a new Class of Frigates after their retirement meant to bridge the gap between the Istif Frigates and the TF-2000 destroyers. This Class could also be produced then on a later date again to replace the then near retirement Barbaros Class. But even if 7 Destroyers are produced this Class needs to be taken into consideration, enlarging the fleet should be one of the top priorities not only for the Navy but for the Armed Forces in general.
STM and other Turkish firms could be tasked already to design such a ship.
Of course all of this hinges on budget and time frames.
But I think it is of the utmost importance for the Navy to already start thinking about this or else we are going to be caught with our pants down.
I agree with some of your points, but it is also relevant to look at quality and not quantity.
The 2030 fleet will be significantly more powerful and capable. In addition, purchasing and building corvettes is fairly cheap and fast. As such, we don't know whether Turkey is planning a replacement for Burak in the coming decade.
I'd easily see an improved Ada design doubling the overall number of the class before the decade is out.
No concrete ones yet, they are thinking about developing jet powered UCAV's.Any future plans