MultaniGuy
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,243
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Buraq comes from religion.I meant this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buraq
Evolution is just a hypothesis which is man made.
What is your point?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Buraq comes from religion.I meant this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buraq
Evolution is just a hypothesis which is man made.
Qu'ran claims to be a book of divine revelation.Like bible and koran ...
Qu'ran claims to be a book of divine revelation.
Nice try idiot
Leave it man. This is a case of 'Belief in Belief'. You cann't change it.Yee yeee he did teleport it and you got it in your hand ... Its man made to...
I was joking when I said speak for yourself. Yes there is a lot of similarityYou will be surprised at how much common DNA you share with a Chimp. Or a mushroom for that matter. And I don't mean any disrespect by that.
Yeah and Saudi are foolish to think that way.
Seriously folks, how many of you think that Humans evolved from monkeys. As in monkeys you see in Zoo etc?
No biologist but speak clearly what you are suggesting.If discovery of gene editing,new smart drugs is dependent upon correct understanding of the Theory of Evolution, then this is a shot in the foot...Any Biologist here who can help me out?
You mean monkey to man.If discovery of gene editing,new smart drugs is dependent upon correct understanding of the Theory of Evolution, then this is a shot in the foot...Any Biologist here who can help me out?
No biologist but speak clearly what you are suggesting.
Do you believe in monkey to man.If Muslim scientists are unable to develop gene editing or better drugs because they donot believe in the Theory of Evolution, then it's a bad thing for Muslim nations..else not...If lack of belief in Theory of Evolution hampers their progress in medicine,food technology, forestry,animal husbandry , then it's bad thing...Does lack of conviction in the Theory of Evolution have real world consequences?
Do you believe in monkey to man.
Well, two things.If Muslim scientists are unable to develop gene editing or better drugs because they donot believe in the Theory of Evolution, then it's a bad thing for Muslim nations..else not...If lack of belief in Theory of Evolution hampers their progress in medicine,food technology, forestry,animal husbandry , then it's bad thing...Does lack of conviction in the Theory of Evolution have real world consequences?
Actually I do not think GAs are very convincing models for evolution itself. GAs are stochastic optimization at its core. There are many other similar ones like simulated annealing etc. Most of these are nature inspired but not natural. Similar is the case of Neural Nets. They are biology inspired but they do not simulate biology.I personally have conviction in the Scientific Consensus.... I have conviction in the mainstream Scientific Consensus in any field of which I am not an expert..I also did a bit of work in Evolutionary Algorithm..It's neat how evolution works in Computer Algorithms
Well, two things.
1. Most of the scientists when they are doing research at times use results of science with ease even if they will never admit to believe them in their social and personal discourse. It is as if they leave their religion at the door step of their lab. Yes, humans can be hypocrites.
2. One can selectively disregard a theory and still use its parts. Like some christians believe that only Humans are special creation, rest animals don't matter Or God created all living beings and he did it via evolution. That allows them to still study and accept genetic and molecular basis of life while rejecting evolution. Again, humans can be hypocrites.
So rest assured, even the most staunch followers of religions get their kids vaccinated even if they believe that it is God who controls life. Similar things allow scientists from such countries to conduct genetic research while vehemently denying evolution.
You should see the extent to how some folks of Jewish faith go to keep their technology compatible with their religion.
Actually I do not think GAs are very convincing models for evolution itself. GAs are stochastic optimization at its core. There are many other similar ones like simulated annealing etc. Most of these are nature inspired but not natural. Similar is the case of Neural Nets. They are biology inspired but they do not simulate biology.
We are predominantly of liquid composition. I didn't say one day ape and one day man.
Speak for yourself mate. My DNA and yours are not the same
Its their internal affairs.
If you ask my opinion on Darwinism, its nonsense.
Its just a hypothesis or a theory.
Who is going to accept that their grand mother was a monkey !