Whats wrong of using some linguistic parts of our ex-slave nations? We owned you with your language and everything for centuries. Be cool with that buddy.
You did not rule anything. This was already explained in the past. 2/3 of all Ottomans were Arabs. There was no conquest at any point in history. Hence why you cannot mention a single Arab-Ottoman war until 100 years ago when a few Arabs revolted and brought the Ottoman entity to an end within less than 2 years.
On the contrary, you wannabe Turkic Anatolians were Arabized (after being ruled by actual Arabs for centuries, half of Turkey was ruled by Umayyad, Abbasids etc. for centuries until the Seljuk arrival) later to be Turkfiied by some 1.5 meter tall barbarian Turkic steppe nomads (Seljuks) who adopted Arabic and Persian culture because their own was worth nothing. Later the Arabized Ottomans came who were the biggest Arab wannabes to the point that they considered Arabs holy and their clerics.
That is why your entire culture, alphabet (Arabic), language (Ottoman language being an Arabic dialect basically), bureaucracy, system (copying the Arab Caliphate that ruled for 1000 years prior), titles (Caliph and Sultan), religion (Islam) etc. was based on Arabic culture and past Arab empires and caliphates.
All Arab territories were ruled by local Arab rulers. Whether the Sharif of Makkah or the Emir of Mount Lebanon in Lebanon.
That is why Turkish influences in the Arab world can be counted on 1 hand. A superior culture cannot be eroded by a weaker one whose entire history evolves around copying others.
In your imaginary fantasy, if we assume that your fairytale is right (forgetting that you are actually the conquered entity on all fronts), what does that tell you that Arabs never adopted your fake identity, spoke Turkic etc.? Talk about a failure. Arabs after ruling Spain and Portugal for 800 years, have left a vastly bigger legacy on all fronts be it language, culture, architecture, cuisine, music etc.
Sad.
Here is my final post in this thread. Wasted enough of times on some Arabized and Turkified lot that live in their own fantasy world were DNA is being denied and living an open lie despite being ridiculed by everyone in the process that is not a wannabe Turk.
Özay Mehmet wrote in his book
Islamic Identity and Development: Studies of the Islamic Periphery:
[28]
“
The ordinary Turks [Turkmen, or Yörüks] did not have a sense of belonging to a ruling ethnic group. In particular, they had a confused sense of self-image. Who were they: Turks, Muslims or Ottomans? Their literature was sometimes Persian, sometimes Arabic, but always courtly and elitist. There was always a huge social and cultural distance between the Imperial centre and the Anatolian periphery. As Bernard Lewis expressed it:
"In the Imperial society of the Ottomans the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages." (Lewis 1968: 1)
In the words of a British observer of the Ottoman values and institutions at the start of the twentieth century:
"The surest way to insult an Ottoman gentleman is to call him a 'Turk'. His face will straightway wear the expression a Londoner's assumes, when he hears himself frankly styled a Cockney. He is no Turk, no savage, he will assure you, but an Ottoman subject of the Sultan, by no means to be confounded with certain barbarians styled Turcomans, and from whom indeed, on the male side, he may possibly be descended." (Davey 1907: 209)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Turkism
I might be talking with some Arab, Greek, Kurdish, Armenian, Assyrian etc. offspring that is a wannabe Turk. Go take a DNA and have some peace. Stop living a lie.
In 20-30 years time those 3.5 million Syrian Arabs will magically turn into 1.5 tall pure Mongoloid Turkic-Mongol steppe nomads that came to Anatolia 1000 years ago, lol, when history will be rewritten once again.
You already forced most people in present day Turkey (back in 1934) to adopt fake Turkified names when you introduced surnames, lol.
The surname law specifically forbade certain surnames that contained connotations of foreign cultures, nations, tribes, and religions.[6][7][8][9] New surnames had to be taken from the Turkish language. The surname could be used with the ‑oğlu ending, and it was forbidden to use Armenian endings such as ‑ian or ‑yan, Slavic endings such as ‑of (or ‑ov), ‑vich, ‑ic, Greek endings such as ‑is, ‑dis, ‑pulos, ‑aki, Persian endings such as ‑zade, and Arab endings such as ‑mahdumu, ‑veled, and ‑bin, "referring to other ethnicities or taken from another language." For example, names such as Arnavutoğlu (the Albanian’s son) or Kürtoğlu (the Kurd’s son), could not be used. Names of clans or tribes could not be used, or re-used.[10] Additionally, names could not be duplicated in the same district, and, in case of any dispute, the family that registered first got the right to keep the claimed name.[11]
As a result, many Greeks, Bulgarians, Albanians, Bosniaks, Jews, Arabs, Armenians, Assyrians, Georgians and Kurds were and are still forced to adopt last names of a more Turkish rendition,[6] sometimes directly translating their original surnames, or otherwise just replacing markers such as Pontic Greek “‑ides” (son of) with Turkish “‑oğlu” (Kazantzoglou, Mitroglou, Mouratoglou, etc.).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surname_Law
Talk about being insecure about yourself and your culture and living a lie. Statistically speaking those that I have interacted with, 95% of those are descendants of Turkified and Arabized people of unknown origins. They don't even know themselves. In KSA you have people of foreign origin and their surnames remain the same, including the actual Turkic ones (Uzbek mainly). Pathetic.