What's new

Tunisia becomes breeding ground for Islamic State fighters

.
It's amazing how such a small country can raise too many scumbags. What's wrong with Tunisia? Wasn't it ruled by a secular dictator for a long time? Although history proves that being secular in governing doesn't prevent the rise of extremists in a country, and Egypt, Syria and to some extent Jordan proved that well.

Edit: Add Saddam's Iraq to the list too.
 
. .
It's amazing how such a small country can raise too many scumbags. What's wrong with Tunisia? Wasn't it ruled by a secular dictator for a long time? Although history proves that being secular in governing doesn't prevent the rise of extremists in a country, and Egypt, Syria and to some extent Jordan proved that well.

Edit: Add Saddam's Iraq to the list too.

ISIS is full of North Africans, mainly Moroccans and Tunisians
 
.
It's amazing how such a small country can raise too many scumbags. What's wrong with Tunisia? Wasn't it ruled by a secular dictator for a long time? Although history proves that being secular in governing doesn't prevent the rise of extremists in a country, and Egypt, Syria and to some extent Jordan proved that well.

Edit: Add Saddam's Iraq to the list too.
Secularism in Muslim countries have always failed and its anger which was there under that secular retard which is now coming out
 
.
According to logic of people here, nothing works in Muslim majority countries except for theocracy but that's extremism itself where minorities are crushed and what's ISIS is doing is done in a different way. But that's also not enough for them, when they establish a theocratic government in one country, then want to expand it further into other muslim majority countries and perhaps if all muslim majority nations are theocracies they might want to expand their rule into non-muslim countries. Their needs can't be satisfied even if the whole world is an Islamic theocracy.
 
.
According to logic of people here, nothing works in Muslim majority countries except for theocracy but that's extremism itself where minorities are crushed and what's ISIS is doing is done in a different way. But that's also not enough for them, when they establish a theocratic government in one country, then want to expand it further into other muslim majority countries and perhaps if all muslim majority nations are theocracies they might want to expand their rule into non-muslim countries. Their needs can't be satisfied even if the whole world is an Islamic theocracy.

You do reliaze that they make up less than 0,03% of Tunisia's population right and even less in all other countries?
 
Last edited:
.
Secularism in Muslim countries have always failed and its anger which was there under that secular retard which is now coming out
Still they want to go to Foreign secular countries and demand all rights. Irony.. isn't it?

Iraq and Turks always have inherit hate against Kurds and Yazidis. Not to mention, Saddam alone killed Thousands of Kurds in 70s and 80s. All these Salafi Wahabi ideology need to be removed but then none of the Islamic nations have that courage.
 
. .
You do reliaze that they make up less than 0,2% of Tunisia's population right and even less in all other countries?
I was talking about the comment above mine. You can't say that secularism is a failure as there are many successful muslim majority countries with a secular government (Kazakhastan is an ideal example).

My guess is that the problem is rooted in inequality created by those "secular" governments. This division alienated many conservative sections of the seociety and they were ignored for a long period of time to a point that they could be easily brainwashed today.
 
.
I was talking about the comment above mine. You can't say that secularism is a failure as there are many successful muslim majority countries with a secular government (Kazakhastan is an ideal example).

My guess is that the problem is rooted in inequality created by those "secular" governments. This division alienated many conservative sections of the seociety and they were ignored for a long period of time to a point that they could be easily brainwashed today.

Make that 0,03% actually.

Who are they? Those "they" are a tiny, tiny, tiny minority in Tunisia and all other countries. Yet certain retards are ready to paint whole countries with the same brush let alone all of the world's 1.7 billion Muslims.

Amazing.

What the hell are you talking about? Why are you talking about secularism? Did anyone mention anything about secularism? Whether Kazakhstan is a success story is debatable too...
 
.
You do reliaze that they make up less than 0,03% of Tunisia's population right and even less in all other countries. Who are they? Those "they" are a tiny, tiny, tiny minority in Tunisia. Yet certain retards are ready to paint whole countries with the same brush let alone all of the world's 1.7 billion Muslims.

Amazing.
Majority of them are Arabized Berbers just like ceylal
 
.
Still they want to go to Foreign secular countries and demand all rights. Irony.. isn't it?

Iraq and Turks always have inherit hate against Kurds and Yazidis. Not to mention, Saddam alone killed Thousands of Kurds in 70s and 80s. All these Salafi Wahabi ideology need to be removed but then none of the Islamic nations have that courage.
Turks are not wahabis Mr most belong to sufi group
 
.
I was talking about that the comment above mine. You can't say that secularism is a failure as there are many successful muslim majority countries with a secular government (Kazakhastan is an ideal example).

My guess is that the problem is rooted in inequality created by those "secular" governments. This division alienated many conservative sections of the seociety and they were ignored for a long period of time to a point that they could be easily brainwashed today.
Actually, secularism works in many countries and we have seen a lot of very good examples like Egypt prior to 2008, Turkey currently, Iran before Revolutions etc, Indonesia and even Pakistan before 70s. The only problem is that current Islamic countries are creating an ideology which is more Arab than Arab so they are inclining towards Salafi wahabi ideology. This is resulting the problem. If you see, all these secular to Radical transformation happened by one leader in these countries.
 
.
Majority of them are Arabized Berbers just like ceylal

Ceylal is not an Arab. He is an Berbarian. Most Algerians and Moroccans are of an Arab-Berber stock. They are all mixed today. Add a bit of Sub-Saharan and Turk into that mixture. Tunisians are mostly of an Arab stock outside of the Berbers in the South (Sahara).

That Ceylal clown has nothing to do with Arabs. Outside of him probably having Arab blood like all other Algerians out there.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom