What's new

Toshakhana Case against Imran Khan in the Dustbin Where it Always Belonged

Imran Niazi's witnesses in the Toshakhana case were declared irrelevant, the request to produce four witnesses was rejected.
The court called for final arguments yesterday.
The case entered the final stage . . .
 
.
The Establishment tout Dilawar has already given the verdict. He's the Agreicultural Department's man to do their dirty work in this case.

It's a pure mockery what's going on, and the way he's behaving. And the IHC CJ Farooq is in the same corrupt boat.

So it's a done decision to disqualify IK.

The farcical and biased nature of proceedings by Dakoo Dilawar is there for all to see:

 
Last edited:
.
Serving Govt. officials, Sarkari witness cannot be called by IK, he can only be called by the court.

Only private witness names can be given by the IK.

And with SC clearing it that Trial court cannot give any indictment before the SC Isb. hearing of IK 3-4 pending cases and that trial should be stopped as this was beyond the jurisdiction and that Humayun Dilawar was partisan and biased as claimed by the IK lawyers.

So the Trial court is practically stopped from giving a judgement by the SC.

And if the Isb CJ, again a prejudiced person, doesn't give relief to IK, he can go to SC. after the Isb HC verdict.

No it is not that, instead SC directed IHC to wrap-up the matter at earliest.
 
.
The Establishment tout Dilawar has already given the verdict. He's the Agreicultural Department's man to do their dirty work in this case.

It's a pure mockery what's going on, and the way he's behaving. And the IHC CJ Farooq is in the same corrupt boat.

So it's a done decision to disqualify IK.

The farcical and biased nature of proceedings by Dakoo Dilawar is there for all to see:


Yes, it seems so. Khawaja Haris will loose another case.

 
. . . .
If convicted, he will be arrested from there and will have to serve the sentence in Adiala Jail.
The appeal will go to the Islamabad High Court. There is a possibility of bail in one month, but the disqualification will remain until the appeal is approved and the sentence is annulled, which may take at least two and a half years.

Serving Govt. officials, Sarkari witness cannot be called by IK, he can only be called by the court.

Only private witness names can be given by the IK.

And with SC clearing it that Trial court cannot give any indictment before the SC Isb. hearing of IK 3-4 pending cases and that trial should be stopped as this was beyond the jurisdiction and that Humayun Dilawar was partisan and biased as claimed by the IK lawyers.

So the Trial court is practically stopped from giving a judgement by the SC.

And if the Isb CJ, again a prejudiced person, doesn't give relief to IK, he can go to SC. after the Isb HC verdict.
Why they were terming this as a victory??
 
. .
Let's be absolutely clear - he's not losing another case.

It's a fixed match and the verdict was decided at its inception by Dakoo Dilawar and Hafiz Whisky.

The nature of the twisted proceedings do nothing other than to corroborate that fact.

Case against NS was not fixed match??
 
. .
Yes you will get more credible investigation than FIA run by pmln

No post of in-questioned screenshots were found in judge's Facebook account: FIA report.

Those who have taken those alleged screenshots should have saved those URLs.

1690978493059.png
 
.
No post of in-questioned screenshots were found in judge's Facebook account: FIA report.

Those who have taken those screenshots should have saved those URLs.

View attachment 943335
It's obvious that Dakoo Dilawar has deleted those posts.

And whether the biased and corrupt FIA (read Hafiz Whisky) was serious in investigating this obvious fact, they could pursue to have them restored:

F2hkBqKbgAEmb5z
 
.
Key point to note is the FIA is NOT saying the defamatory posts by Dakoo Dilawar were fake, and also confirming that the account in question is his.

Moreover, as IK's legal team are stating:

Thousands of social media users, including senior journalists, viewed posts on the account and took screenshots and screen recordings.
Senior journalist Saqib Bashir, president of High Court Reporters Association, also saw these posts on the judge's account and tweeted about it.

Therefore, there is documentary video evidence and witness statements that prove beyond doubt that these posts were in his Facebook account - and therefore he's a biased Establishment tout as we all know.

But a fixed match is a fixed match, and there will be no justice delivered.
 
.
It's obvious that Dakoo Dilawar has deleted those posts.

And whether the biased and corrupt FIA (read Hafiz Whisky) was serious in investigating this obvious fact, they could pursue to have them restored:

F2hkBqKbgAEmb5z

These posts were of 2014 and some posts on fake screenshots has misprinting too. Poor job at Photoshop.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom