If someone patents a technique for making clean water out of anything and then decides not to sell it or asks an exorbitant price. Would you be ok with kids in your country and other places dying of thirst when you know this thing can solve your problem?
Or better yet, if someone buys massive acres of farmland and then ruins it.. is that fair or is the law the allows him to keep something that could benefit all humanity fair?
If i create something and sell it at a price
(any price exorbitant or not) what rights do you think you have over it? Even if your children are dying, what rights do they have over my rights for a proper living which i make by selling the said item?
or, if i ruin my farmland, who are you to talk to me about my stuff? Buy your own land, do with it what you want.
Have you ever worked for a living? I mean worked with your own head, not doing stuff on orders from superiors???????
I'm sorry, this may sound harsh, but when you start working with stuff you created out of your head, to which IP applies and you ar living off it, then maybe you can talk, but up until then your logical fallacies are just a p
iss poor attempt of justifying theft.
Needless to say they are epicly bad examples, tailored specifically to make people agree with your "common" sense of justifying theft.
IE.....if someone creates a device to make clean water, he would not be selling at exorbitant prices because he would be cutting himself away from profit, high prices means only developed world could afford, but we already have water so the device wouldn't sell. He would be forced to price it down.
Second example-who'd buy masses of land and pay loads of money for it, if it will all be ruined. Noone.
