To whom does the term 'Aryan' belong?

[Srinivas]

@Srinivas I do not know about you, but I can tell a Punjabi, Pathan and Kashmiri from far away!
@Srinivas I am seriously surprised with you rejecting SCIENTIFIC PROOF!

Just coz someone eats the same food as you doesnt make that person an Indian or anything else or what not?!

Sceintific proof tell that there percentage of gene found more in a particular area. Punjabis, pathans and also Kashmirs also consists of people who are dark skinned and dravidian like features.

there is no such thing as pure race in Indian Sub continent.

Even Pakistanis have the features of South Indians, there are also dark skinned people in Pakistan.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

@curioususer

What did i tell you ? What did this thread come down to ?

I have experience on this forum buddy Try this discussion on a different forum with more educated people.

 

[Srinivas]

and varuna and mitra .

indeed those who went southward they were consumed by dravidian gods and practices.

the rigveda did NOT mention ram, krishna, vishnu, brahma, ect etc.

Also the vedic aryans were not idolworshiping

Yes you are correct to some extent. But most of the Ramayana happened in modern day UP. and Mahabharata Happened in North west India.

The practices which we see now a day in Hinduism are a mixed ones from various groups, not related to one group.

 

[Nair saab]

Dravidians are south Indians if Im not wrong. So yes we are dravidians too and extremely proud of it.

Your wrong i am a South Indian... But i am not a Dravidian...

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

Your wrong i am a South Indian... But i am not a Dravidian...

There is no such race as a dravidian. It is a language group. You speak a dravidian language if you are South Indian.

 

[dabong1]

aryan...dravidians and aliens.

These aryans came thousands of years ago and after that plenty of other races-groups-tribes have come into the pak-indo region and have all mixed.
Using the colour of your skin as some sort of yardstick is totally false as any peoples who move to hot region go darker over time and if the same peoples moved to a cold region would turn white.

I dont why i am wasting my time on such a silly thread

 

[Spring Onion]

The only "pure race" are the aborigines or some hidden tribe..... everything is a mix and a remix.

the point of debate is not purity of the race but the main point that aryans and dravidians were two different races. Hindus are not aryans. if mixure of later aryans that could be BUT not aryans basically

 

[Fuego]

Your wrong i am a South Indian... But i am not a Dravidian...

Oops!!
My bad!
So we all are Aryans and Dravidians may be??

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

Indo-Aryan 72%, Dravidian 25%, Mongoloid and other 3% (2000)

This is what the CIA world fact factbook says about India

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html

 

[bronxbull]

well going against the norm and faith is one thing BUT Rigveda describing eating of beef/cow sacrifice and worshiping god in non idol form is quiet another.

yeah but those practices alone dont define it,it is not the hard and fast rule to keep.

 

[Fuego]

the point of debate is not purity of the race but the main point that aryans and dravidians were two different races. Hindus are not aryans. if mixure of later aryans that could be BUT not aryans basically

Then who are aryans according to you

 

[bronxbull]

and varuna and mitra .

indeed those who went southward they were consumed by dravidian gods and practices.

the rigveda did NOT mention ram, krishna, vishnu, brahma, ect etc.

Also the vedic aryans were not idolworshiping

First two were human beings who came later and the second two are not gods in the strict sense.

 

[dabong1]

This aryan-Dravidian stuff is all bull5hit and has no relevance to anything in normal life.

 

[Spring Onion]

Yes you are correct to some extent. But most of the Ramayana happened in modern day UP. and Mahabharata Happened in North west India. The practices which we see now a day in Hinduism are a mixed ones from various groups, not related to one group.

to bold part. in mahabharata the dravidian god defeats the vedic aryan god

 

[dabong1]

First two were human beings who came later and the second two are not gods in the strict sense.

Sry i think i missed something there.......the hindus have a "adam and eve" story?