What's new

To the Chinese here...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's pretty obvious he's an Indian. He was posting about Dawood and referencing an Indian news channel and claiming to have "inside" information regarding meeting with modi/obama on this issue.

Funny he's a retired dude yet he gets information (and gets to go to white house anytime) like he was President of US.

Yes, I dont think he is who he says he is. And i think 90% of PDF will agree with me. He knows too many trivial things about sub continent that even a seasoned diplomat shouldn't know.
 
.
I read it just fine. The only thing it shows is that your hallucinations have gotten the better of you.



More delusions.
I have no desire to destroy you since you are a non-entity to me,
My only interest in you is if I happen to see you stalking and harassing valuable posters because they beat you in some argument.



Once again, read ENGLISH.
I posted a link to the Swedish government website which flatly contradicted her claims about border guard policy wrt asylum seekers.



I know you well enough to know that you cannot let go of this grudge and you will keep smarting and come back to say crap about me behind my back.



Many people have claimed he is an Indian.
I don't know and I don't want to guess.
All I know is that he is no high level State Dept. diplomat with access to secret information as he claims to be,

I just enjoy watching him play his little charade. It's fun...
I read it just fine. The only thing it shows is that your hallucinations have gotten the better of you.



More delusions.
I have no desire to destroy you since you are a non-entity to me,
My only interest in you is if I happen to see you stalking and harassing valuable posters because they beat you in some argument.



Once again, read ENGLISH.
I posted a link to the Swedish government website which flatly contradicted her claims about border guard policy wrt asylum seekers.



I know you well enough to know that you cannot let go of this grudge and you will keep smarting and come back to say crap about me behind my back.



Many people have claimed he is an Indian.
I don't know and I don't want to guess.
All I know is that he is no high level State Dept. diplomat with access to secret information as he claims to be,

I just enjoy watching him play his little charade. It's fun...

why post twice?
 
.
PS as i said, my wife already explain why the swedish article you quote are inline of wha5 she said, you juat refuse to believe it and without giving any reason (probably citingher bad english again) but this is between you and her so dont quote me on that. Maybe you actually did know Sweden more then a swede even you had never even live there, who knows.

The Swedish 'article' was another topic.

he issue I am talking about is the Swedish border guards' policy towards asylum seekers. There was no 'article' involved. I posted a direct link to the Swedish migration board website which stated their policy in plain English, contradicting her claims.
 
.
It's pretty obvious he's an Indian. He was posting about Dawood and referencing an Indian news channel and claiming to have "inside" information regarding meeting with modi/obama on this issue.

Funny he's a retired dude yet he gets information (and gets to go to white house anytime) like he was President of US.

He could be of Indian ethnicity or even born in India yet he can still work for US state department, those 2 things are not mutually exclusive. I happened to know quite a few indian working in the State department.

And you dont need to be Indian to hate the Chinese here, i am Chinese (even some of the chinese member dont regonize it) yet the chinese member here hate me and i hate them. The Chinese member here hate anyone that does not suit their purpose, indian, pakistani, australian, brits canadian and yes, other Chinese. on the other hand they like whoever suit their purpose.

About the secret information things, once you get the clearance, you will have them forever, whether you retire or not. I worked with NSA for.2 years i can still access some classified ops detail and reddited black op done after i left, ofcourse no current operational detail whatsoever as tuose are almost always need to know basis
 
.
this bashing thread started by self-claimed 'Mr. Hurt' or 'Mr. Impartial' came to page 6 and on going. :D
 
.
He could be of Indian ethnicity or even born in India yet he can still work for US state department, those 2 things are not mutually exclusive. I happened to know quite a few indian working in the State department.

And you dont need to be Indian to hate the Chinese here, i am Chinese (even some of the chinese member dont regonize it) yet the chinese member here hate me and i hate them. The Chinese member here hate anyone that does not suit their purpose, indian, pakistani, australian, brits canadian and yes, other Chinese. on the other hand they like whoever suit their purpose.

About the secret information things, once you get the clearance, you will have them forever, whether you retire or not. I worked with NSA for.2 years i can still access some classified ops detail and reddited black op done after i left, ofcourse no current operational detail whatsoever as tuose are almost always need to know basis
Indeed he can be of Indian origin. But the way he talks, he may never have been what he claims to be.

And I know, many pakistanis hate me here and call me Indian or pakistan hater. But when there is sufficient evidence, we can start to doubt what he claims. The way he talks does not resemble state dept language and also portrays his interest of India.

Finally, well you could for NSA so you'd know. From what I've read, many ex senior officials, as as the cabinet and ex president, they do have access to former and upcoming information. But I'm unsure about the bottom ones. They likely don't have access to new information and likely may not have access to the field they didn't partake. For example, when you worked at NSA, did you come around classified information about ww2 (which public doesn't know)
 
.
The fact that YOU and Mr. State Dept. don't understand is that I am not talking prepared statements.

Contrary to your narrow domain of military knowledge -- and abject cluelessness without -- I am well aware of how official statements are prepared, not just for governments but for corporations.

The issue with Mr. State Dept. is not whether he WRITES his documents but whether he CAN WRITE in proper English prose. His English usage shows a level of deficiency which makes it clear he CANNOT write English prose even at a proper high school level.

The English is just the tip of the iceberg. His 'knowledge' about other world affairs, from Crimea to Middle East is so comically wrong, it's a joy to read.
Neither was I.

The point here is that there is a difference between a 'working knowledge' of the language versus having a 'refined skill' at it. I know plenty of technical specialists, in and out of the military, who took just enough English courses to get their degrees and could not care any less about it. Any English major would have great joy taking apart Henry Kissinger as he speaks but as far as Presidents and the US State Dept goes, the K-man's English is just fine. He could debate global affairs in circles around you without breaking an intellectual sweat while all you could do is yammer about his English skill.
 
.
Neither was I.

The point here is that there is a difference between a 'working knowledge' of the language versus having a 'refined skill' at it. I know plenty of technical specialists, in and out of the military, who took just enough English courses to get their degrees and could not care any less about it. Any English major would have great joy taking apart Henry Kissinger as he speaks but as far as Presidents and the US State Dept goes, the K-man's English is just fine. He could debate global affairs in circles around you without breaking an intellectual sweat while all you could do is yammer about his English skill.
Meanwhile he's laughing his bum off at all of us on how we're feeding this troll (retired state dept)

I'm surprised the mods haven't shut down this thread as this was a mere "rant" post.
 
.
lol as far as i concern, he know nothing in the US, not just state department, every level of US government could hlhage and possibly have a bad standard of English as the US government hire people not on their English standard ( well they do but not the most important) But their abilit6 to work

From top to bottom we have a bunch if first generation foreign born american that speak crap English working in Every Level of our government.

The point he pick your English show that he is extremely ignorant or simply the last desperate trick to try and discredit someone.

Thats strange tho as my English is quite bad ye5 he dos not make these kind of comment to me, yet. l9l
Arnold Schwarzenegger, the accent aside, speaks English with poor grammar, but you would not recognize it by watching his movies or when he gave speeches in front of the California legislature when he was The Governator.

Meanwhile he's laughing his bum off at all of us on how we're feeding this troll (retired state dept)
I do not care if he is a real retired US diplomat or not.

I would not stoop so low as to use English as a condition to take someone seriously on an anonymous Internet forum accessible by anyone in the world. I work with managers and supervisors from Singapore and their English is no better than the people's here.
 
.
I doubt he's from the state dept. Most likely an Indian. Or a really low profile from state dept.

Like who the hell will use such an ID, especially after being retired? Or it's for that e-peen (hey i'm retired state dept, my comments triumph yours)

I don't know what is his origin, but have you heard of Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana and the Vice Chairman of the Republican Governors Association? He is of Indian origin, so does that mean he is lesser American?
 
.
I have chosen to write to you here in this section and spill it it out. What I'm sure is going to be another barrage of expected comments- but away from the main forums.

My very first post regarding the Chinese was a warning to those who felt china's economy was going come crashing down. I called it a pipe dream. I actually know many intelligent and reasonable Chinese in my interactions outside these forums.

I feel a bit bad about reigning in on the Chinese parade here. I guess I'm disgusted with your attitudes on these forums. As I said, the way you behave here is like the the new rich, arrogant in your display of your new found richness.

You attack everyone not on the basis of real national interest. Rather you do it just get down into the sloth. Examples of which is when I've read many Chinese here attack vietnamese and call their women "whores" effectively and get away with it. Or when you attack Indians and troll them constantly or dare say a Japanese who has ever disagreed with you and so and so forth.

I've seen you trying to bully many and just speak to the lowest denomination.

If you don't have Chinese posters who are constantly talking about Nuking another country, we see others who are talking about the appearances and the color of skin of those coming from others countries. This is despicable and not necessary. Sure, some others also use this language against you but they by far few and beyond.

I lost my bearings for which I should apologize to the rest of the community.
Disgusting for a new member like you to generalize all the Chinese posters here, I might not be one of them but this definitely shows how ignorant you are, I just hope that not all American members here are like you. Your posts definitely paints a bad impression to Americans here for me.
 
.
the K-man's English is just fine.

Only an ignoramus like you would believe that Kissinger has bad English.

I don't expect you to have the faintest clue about the importance of having a certain minimum level of English proficiency in order to work at a "high level" in the diplomatic corps of an Anglophone country.

This guy's English is so bad, he wouldn't pass a high school English test, never mind communicating anything to anybody.

He could debate global affairs in circles around you without breaking an intellectual sweat while all you could do is yammer about his English skill.

Since you have once again wandered outside your narrow specialty of cut-and-paste radar specs, it is hilarious to see you yammering away about 'international relations'. This clown doesn't even understand the complexity behind Crimea. He makes claims which are ludicrously false about the Middle East and the subcontinent.

Just because YOU get regularly schooled and humiliated, I can understand your desperate need to live vicariously through somebody else. But you picked the wrong ride.

Better luck next time...

I don't know what is his origin, but have you heard of Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana and the Vice Chairman of the Republican Governors Association? He is of Indian origin, so does that mean he is lesser American?

It's not a question of being lesser or equal; it's about objectivity and bias.

If a Pakistani-American or an Indian-American was commenting on India-Pak matters, it would be reasonable to suspect bias until proven otherwise.

Many hyphenated-Americans on this forum carry a huge chip on their shoulders and exhibit clear bias. That's fine, as long as people are open about it.
 
.
I don't know what is his origin, but have you heard of Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana and the Vice Chairman of the Republican Governors Association? He is of Indian origin, so does that mean he is lesser American?
Yes. According to all the Chinese and many Pakistanis in this forum, the only America is a white-America. Any non-whites that are treated decently and with respect by white Americans are merely props to keep up the facade of a multi-racial and multi-ethnic America. According to all the Chinese, many Pakistanis, and many Indians on this forum, non-white US citizens are at least tolerated or at best pets for white Americans.

I take great pleasure in seeing any Chinese, Pakistani, or Indian on this forum make my origin an issue in any discussion whenever he find his arguments challenged. He -- whoever he is -- believes the US is a racist country but is completely blind to his own latent racism. I always wonder how the Pakistani-Americans, the Indian-Americans, or the Chinese-Americans feels whenever they see such insulting comments, considering they are usually passive about it. My origin is evocative to many and I get a kick out of it.
 
.
My friend, I can't tell you the last time I wrote a paper in my long tenure with the state. I'm an old man , 30 years into it and people at my level shoot off those infamous diplomatic cables, write down our views in bullets and leave it to some junior fella to write a paper. You think we are all wordsmiths and spend our time writing papers do you? Nobody has time for reading a thesis. Would you like to know the famous question we are all expected to be prepared for at my meetings? " Give me your top three". Then again a local like you wouldn't know. Sec of state, senior diplomats comes into a meeting and he/she has 20 minutes or less most of the time, unless its a crisis situation.


Where have you found me lacking on the few topics around international affairs I've written to date. You could have an opposing view - but can you point me to any thread I started here, where my expressed views, were not aligned with our countries and state department? Could you with your great international affairs resume correct me on any?

Can you point out to me a single group that goes around calling the women as basically being whores? Have you ever read how they write to posters from Vietnam? Are you really defending them when it is painfully obvious that they have been getting away with just horrible behaviour. Maybe you are. I saw how childish and immature your reply was to jhungary. You stooped to a level similar to the group in question. You should apologize to him

To the bold part:

I have already called you out on that. You never responded back.

In this thread, you argued that Palestinians need to recognize Israel as a Jewish state if there has to be any peace.

Now anybody with a solid background in International Relations will tell you that under International system and legal code, you don't recognize countries as "jewish" state or "islamic" state or whatever.

All countries are same with same rights and responsibilities.

So I wonder how someone who have supposedly worked in the state department uses such amateurish language.

Even John Kerry has said that Palestinians don't need to recognize Israel as a "Jewish" state.

Why do you think recognition of Israel is not enough for there to be peace? Why Palestinians have to recognize Israel as a "Jewish" state, even though there is no precedent of nation-states recognizing each other as such.
 
Last edited:
.
Only an ignoramus like you would believe that Kissinger has bad English.
Never said Kissinger had 'bad' English. Now I wonder who really have a comprehension problem. :lol:

I watched/listened to Kissinger many times and if I am a nitpicking English major, I could pick apart Kissinger easily. Same with Arnold 'The Terminator' Schwarzenegger.

But here is where you continues to look foolish no matter how many times you declared you 'win' or that you 'schooled' people.

Marbury finds peace, success in China - Columbia Daily Tribune | Columbia Missouri: Basketball
I don’t make nowhere near the money that I made when I was playing in the NBA,” Marbury said...
You really think anybody care for the highlighted, whether it is the NBA or the US State Dept ? People uses 'gonna' in lieu of 'going to' all the time, and those people includes US Presidents. I guess only you would stop taking Barack Obama seriously because he uses 'gonna'.

On an anonymous Internet forum where English is chosen as the working language for debates, nitpicking someone's poor English, no matter where the speaker came from, is a sign of a small and petty mind.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom