What's new

To solve Kashmir, see LoC as border, says PM Pak envoy S K Lambah

that what is exactly happening in AJK atleast. Rest of yr post however is stupid. We will never give up our regional interests.

What regional interests is that exactly? Bleeding India by sending terrorists in Kashmir? That hasn't worked. India is still here. We on the other hand are getting poorer and poorer.
 
The separatist sentiment in J & K is limited to only Kashmir Valley. Don't just assume that if an area is Muslim majority they would want to be with Pakistan especially Shia areas.Kashmiris are also only looking for freedom not joining Pakistan. In short kuch nai milega.
theMuslim League secured and won 425 out of 496 seats reserved for Muslims (and about 89.2% of Muslim votes) on a policy of creating an independent state of Pakistan,.. muslims in subcontinent showed they didnt wanted to be a part of India.. Pakistan accept 1/4 the size of its population from india.. many couldnt moved as they have weak will and didnt want left behind the properties and jobs .. although after freedom india tried to make muslims against Pakistan .. but in genral they like Pakistan .. they have to prove their loyolities every day in india ...Hindustan is for hindus , ur recent Choice of PM , electing the most anti muslim leader showed how important is their feelings for u
 
Can we engineer a new population exchange pleeeeease? Your Kalash and Hunza folks for our Azaadi-seeking folks. :meeting:

The Kalasha and the Hunza people are native to that region. Why should they leave their lands? As for the Azaadi folks, they will always remain but can be controlled by giving their children decent education and jobs.
 
I guess Indians have to talk to the Saudis and Chinese to make it happen.
 
India will also has to drop its claim on Gilgit-Baltistan region. The people there have no interest in joining India.


And Pakistan on Jammu , Leh and Ladakh . Hindu and Buddhist dominated areas will not even think about it for a second .
 
well from oyu side of boder a minority of kashmiris may wish to make an independent kashmir ... no one wants to join india .. from their side of border alot of people wants to join pakistan ... Kashmir is not a peace of land for us... We do it for the innocent mislims of kashmir ... Pakistan stood for muslims all around the globe .. though we are weak now ... our enemy is much bigger and stronger then us ... we shoul now bow down ...

You do it for control over water, which of course is everything to fight for. End of story!
 
theMuslim League secured and won 425 out of 496 seats reserved for Muslims (and about 89.2% of Muslim votes) on a policy of creating an independent state of Pakistan,.. muslims in subcontinent showed they didnt wanted to be a part of India.. Pakistan accept 1/4 the size of its population from india.. many couldnt moved as they have weak will and didnt want left behind the properties and jobs .. although after freedom india tried to make muslims against Pakistan .. but in genral they like Pakistan .. they have to prove their loyolities every day in india ...Hindustan is for hindus , ur recent Choice of PM , electing the most anti muslim leader showed how important is their feelings for u

How is this even related to Kashmir, Sheikh Abdullah was the most popular leader of Kashmir who didn't believe in Two Nation Theory and Muslim League had no presence there. ;)
 
What happens to the monkey trap then?, what happens to the PA's extended budget based on the Kashmir banana? what happens to the thousands of jihadis that are being trained to fight in Kashmir?
I guess Indian Army's budget is shrinking every year......
 
Pakistanis need to be stop being delusional that they can conquer Kashmir on horseback against India. Best solution will be to accept LoC as a border. Or Maybe turn all of Pakistani and Indian administered Kashmir into an autonomous region with Kashmiris electing their own president and parliament, while India and Pakistan control the border and defence of Kashmir and collect taxes on behalf of an autonomous Kashmir.

1st option is most practical. second one is Utopian! good but not feasible!
 
How is this even related to Kashmir, Sheikh Abdullah was the most popular leader of Kashmir who didn't believe in Two Nation Theory and Muslim League had no presence there. ;)
its related as 90 percent of muslims all over india supported Pakistan ...just trying to tell u muslim as whole wanted Pakistan .. Opnion of a famous leader cant be considered as opnion of majority .. btw u jailed him and put him in exile ..
 
What regional interests is that exactly? Bleeding India by sending terrorists in Kashmir? That hasn't worked. India is still here. We on the other hand are getting poorer and poorer.
In WWII a adjutant of British Africa army's Desert Rats came to Gen Montgomery and said that what we r doing in Norway (supporting partisan) and fighting against Nazis is like banging yr head against wall and if its ever going to work? Then the legendary General said 'u only r viewing the pain suffered by the person banging his head against wall but u dont know for sure that the brick in the wall is also getting weaker'' And in the end we know how these partisans and desert rats of gen Montgomery change the outcome of battle from literally jaws of defeat. It prompted the Churchill to said after the defeat of desert fox of nazis in africa that ''This is the beginning of the end''.

What my friend is needed, is to stay determined, patient and committed. At this time we r gaining an upperhand in the regional affairs and r now showing to the enemy what we can do and what needs to be done.
 
its related as 90 percent of muslims all over india supported Pakistan ...just trying to tell u muslim as whole wanted Pakistan .. Opnion of a famous leader cant be considered as opnion of majority .. btw u jailed him and put him in exile ..

No, its not related. ;)

In WWII a adjutant of British Africa army's Desert Rats came to Gen Montgomery and said that what we r doing in Norway (supporting partisan) and fighting against Nazis is like banging yr head against wall and if its ever going to work? Then the legendary General said 'u only r viewing the pain suffered by the person banging his head against wall but u dont know for sure that the brick in the wall is also getting weaker'' And in the end we know how these partisans and desert rats of gen Montgomery change the outcome of battle from literally jaws of defeat. It prompted the Churchill to said after the defeat of desert fox of nazis in africa that ''This is the beginning of the end''.

What my friend is needed, is to stay determined, patient and committed. At this time we r gaining an upperhand in the regional affairs and r now showing to the enemy what we can do and what needs to be done.

Why you wrote this here.
 
In WWII a adjutant of British Africa army's Desert Rats came to Gen Montgomery and said that what we r doing in Norway (supporting partisan) and fighting against Nazis is like banging yr head against wall and if its ever going to work? Then the legendary General said 'u only r viewing the pain suffered by the person banging his head against wall but u dont know for sure that the brick in the wall is also getting weaker'' And in the end we know how these partisans and desert rats of gen Montgomery change the outcome of battle from literally jaws of defeat. It prompted the Churchill to said after the defeat of desert fox of nazis in africa that ''This is the beginning of the end''.

What my friend is needed, is to stay determined, patient and committed. At this time we r gaining an upperhand in the regional affairs and r now showing to the enemy what we can do and what needs to be done.

Its funny how pakistanis keep comparing themselves to great nations all the time.

The reality is it is a puppet of superpowers which hasnt achieved anything other than gaining some land from India because most Muslims - thhe muslim kings, leaders and muslim league - were british allies working against the freedom of India. The part of kashmir that you got was also because of the Afghan pushtuns who ransacked the Kashmiri people and the king.
 
BB.jpg
In WWII a adjutant of British Africa army's Desert Rats came to Gen Montgomery and said that what we r doing in Norway (supporting partisan) and fighting against Nazis is like banging yr head against wall and if its ever going to work? Then the legendary General said 'u only r viewing the pain suffered by the person banging his head against wall but u dont know for sure that the brick in the wall is also getting weaker'' And in the end we know how these partisans and desert rats of gen Montgomery change the outcome of battle from literally jaws of defeat. It prompted the Churchill to said after the defeat of desert fox of nazis in africa that ''This is the beginning of the end''.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom