What's new

Time for a fresh start - Rename Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know, crime is crime. Criminals are everywhere. Just want Pakistan to become wealthy by any means necessary. Too much suffering.

So why do These bradford hooligans or criminals but political workers of tlp terrorists?

If wealth was the aim. India is on Paper still richer than Pakistan.

But Pakistanis are happier People than indians.

Humans cant buy happiness.

So how about those mutton chops. You keep Ignoring that. It will be 80s Britain. Good ol bradford crusade.
 
.
Did I target you on a personal level in any way? Like Indus said deconstruct by argument by all means, that's what I want but don't insult me.
How is that insult?... I just stated the obvious..isn't ...millions of people migrated to Pakistan ..so what is so fancy or special about the couple who procreated you?
 
Last edited:
.
How do you as a surinamese fit in this chop suey of apparent identity crisis if we take our amish thread starter.

Well from what I have observed and seen is that there are different groups of immigrants:

Some of these groups are:
1. Immigrants who want to be accepted by the Dutch and act Dutch
2. Immigrants who are neutral and can be a mixed bag in culture and attitude
3. Immigrants who dislike the Dutch and have the highest chance to become radicalized
4. Immigrants who are isolated, cannot even talk Dutch and hardly interact with the Dutch

Me personally I would say I am neutral in my attitude towards the Dutch.
I do not need acceptance nor do I need to dislike them.

Regarding culture I would say I am used to typical immigrant ideas regarding food (a lot of) and family (a lot of drama). But just because I am used to them, does not mean I like them. The food I like, the drama I do not.

In social ideas I would say I am more progressive, simply because I do not care.
For example I do not care for all the rules our ancestors had.
These rules hold our people and our progress back.

I do not think that I have an identity crisis.
When I look in the mirror, I see a Hindustani. I see myself.
I always defend my own culture, even though we do not have much.

And why do you find Peace Order and rule of law as boring? Indian genes acting up?

No, I was just joking.
Of course I like my peace in my neighborhood.
 
. .
So why do These bradford hooligans or criminals but political workers of tlp terrorists?

If wealth was the aim. India is on Paper still richer than Pakistan.

But Pakistanis are happier People than indians.

Humans cant buy happiness.

So how about those mutton chops. You keep Ignoring that. It will be 80s Britain. Good ol bradford crusade.

india isn't richer than Pakistan. Not even close lol...

Look up the median wealth per capita figures. You are mistaking "average GDP per capita" with prosperity. GDP is a production figure and "average" is a very deceptive measure since a few billionaires can move the 'average' towards higher numbers---meanwhile 90% of pop lives in shit.

Median is a much more accurate measure of prosperity of a common man.
 
.
I thought you said you were from Surinam

There are different etnicities in Suriname:

- Hindustani's (descendants of British Indian contract labourers)
- Creole's / Maroons (descendants of African slaves)
- Javanese (descendants of Indonesian labourers, Indonesia and Suriname were both colonies of The Netherlands)
- Chinese (descendants of Chinese labourers from Macau)
- Indians (like Native Americans, first inhabitants of Suriname)
- Dutch
- other etnicities (Brazilians, Haitians, Dominicans etc.)

So I am called a Surinamese Hindustani (in Dutch: 'Surinaamse Hindoestaan')
 
Last edited:
.
india isn't richer than Pakistan. Not even close lol...

Look up the median wealth per capita figures. You are mistaking "average GDP per capita" with prosperity. GDP is a production figure and "average" is a very deceptive measure since a few billionaires can move the 'average' towards higher numbers---meanwhile 90% of pop lives in shit.

Median is a much more accurate measure of prosperity of a common man.
I think what you are asking is too much for a troll.
 
.
india isn't richer than Pakistan. Not even close lol...

Look up the median wealth per capita figures. You are mistaking "average GDP per capita" with prosperity. GDP is a production figure and "average" is a very deceptive measure since a few billionaires can move the 'average' towards higher numbers---meanwhile 90% of pop lives in shit.

Median is a much more accurate measure of prosperity of a common man.

Clap claps clap

I was making a Rhetorical point.

You still owe me a word in Urdu for forrest abcdefgh bhayya
 
.
How is that insult?... I just stated the obvious..isn't ...millions of people migrated to Pakistan ..so what is so fancy or special about the couple who procreated you?

Its not special. I used it as an example to support my argument you thick f**k.Think laterally. Somebody needs to hit the deport button on you.
 
.
Yes its True most People in bradford cannot speak english and have made it a No Go areas for the son of soils of England.

Acid attacks have also risen. Most now refer London to as Acidistan

Sorry you are reading amplified propaganda.
 
. .
Its not special. I used it as an example to support my argument you thick f**k.Think laterally. Somebody needs to hit the deport button on you.
Your frustration and desperation are visible and that's typical of your lot but still it was neither a favour nor special in anyway..so why did you mention?
 
Last edited:
.
What is there to deconstruct? There is an entire movement behind Pakistan, even the name had a meaning and was a specifically designed part of the campaign for the nation. You talk about wanting identity but then shit over what little identity you already have by suggesting you want a new name. The term Stan is very relevant to our culture and our heritage. It has it's roots in Farsi, it's a term used to describe a homeland, it's also aligned with our ethnic roots as central Asians. The linguistic alternative is desh, a term the Bengali's use, a term which finds it's origins in India and in sanskrit or whatever. We aren't them, we're genetically different, we're ideologically different, we use a different script for our text!

Alternatively we could take something from greek, or latin - maybe call it Narnia or Hogworts? Something trendy with better potential for hash tags? Maybe we can give it a spanish origin name? Why are you people so hooked up on Indus? The IVC was only a part of our history, it's not the start and it's not the end. If the borders have been drawn differently and we'd had all the land we originally asked for, would the indus obsession still persist?

Identity is what you make of it. People spilt blood sweat and tears for Pakistan. They rallied behind the term Pakistan, they fought for Pakistan, respect the heritage, respect the sacrifice and respect the name - for f--ks sake!
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom