What's new

Three Indian blunders in the 1971 war

i am surprised. are you really pakistani?? because usually pakistani would get angry of reuniting with india.

Its not about reuniting with India, is about reuniting Pakistan & Bangladesh taking borders of Pakistan to 1947 level.
 
.
I know but don't think India could try Pakistan for a crime it didn't commit on Indians or on Indian soil. Therefore your article makes no sense.
Ummm......
When the war ended, all the Pakistani POW's were relocated to India (they wanted to compare our biryani with that in Lahore). Of these 195 had prima-facie cases and were to be tried for war crimes in Bangladesh, but were later repatriated to Pakistan in accordance with the Delhi Accord (I think) to be tried there. Guess what happened next.
Anyway, I won't bore you jamatis with these things. I know you are already having a hard time dealing with the present trials and hangings.
 
.
simple this is term for Sniper in Arabic, because sniper was already a chosen name on PDF so i adopted an Arabic term, and i no need to be false flagger at all.
How would an Ukranian understand arabic???


On topic:
Video of ceremony of surrendering of PA to Indian army in 1971.
Must note that the video says the PA was allowed to keep arms for their protection as they feared Bengali vengeance. Also that Gen.Niazi was pretty much at a loss for words to explain why he gave the order to surrender; he says it was basically a game that they lost, although he could have gone on to fight much longer than he did.
 
Last edited:
.
Ummm......
When the war ended, all the Pakistani POW's were relocated to India (they wanted to compare our biryani with that in Lahore). Of these 195 had prima-facie cases and were to be tried for war crimes in Bangladesh, but were later repatriated to Pakistan in accordance with the Delhi Accord (I think) to be tried there. Guess what happened next.
Anyway, I won't bore you jamatis with these things. I know you are already having a hard time dealing with the present trials and hangings.
Keep on blabbing but most of you are well aware that majority of Bangladesh hate Indians and India.
 
. .
ok. sorry i misunderstood.

Its ok, no need to be sorry, although what you understood can happen like EU if Indian leadership want it sincerely but they want to grab others land and resources and make them slaves.
 
.
Its ok, no need to be sorry, although what you understood can happen like EU if Indian leadership want it sincerely but they want to grab others land and resources and make them slaves.
If that was what we wanted, we would have annexed east Pakistan in 1971. Instead we gave them their own country, and withdrew to India. It's not India that covetes other people's territory or states.
 
.
How would an Ukranian understand arabic???
Your presence on this thread and

On topic:
Video of ceremony of surrendering of PA to Indian army in 1971.
Must note that the video says the PA was allowed to keep arms for their protection as they feared Bengali vengeance. Also that Gen.Niazi was pretty much at a loss for words to explain why he gave the order to surrender; he says it was basically a game that they lost, although he could have gone on to fight much longer than he did.
Well i am able to speak at least 15 languages and there are many personals on this forum which belong to spy agencies, some are x army and some civilians i must tell you that war is always fought when you have reason to fight Niazi knew that East Pakistan is gone and only fighting would led to killing of soldiers on both side for nothing and a clear defeat for him in last, and you said Indian Intel got US message do you think every body is fool even today India is incapable of Decrypting those orders which are given to IBG's 1971 is long gone, and simply just accept that If US was ready to attack India then they would not have stopped, 7th fleet would have destroyed all indian Navy in less then 12 hours,now a simple Ans US was never interested to save east Pakistan because there interest was in WEST Pakistan.
 
.
Well i am able to speak at least 15 languages and there are many personals on this forum which belong to spy agencies, some are x army and some civilians i must tell you that war is always fought when you have reason to fight Niazi knew that East Pakistan is gone and only fighting would led to killing of soldiers on both side for nothing and a clear defeat for him in last, and you said Indian Intel got US message do you think every body is fool even today India is incapable of Decrypting those orders which are given to IBG's 1971 is long gone, and simply just accept that If US was ready to attack India then they would not have stopped, 7th fleet would have destroyed all indian Navy in less then 12 hours,now a simple Ans US was never interested to save east Pakistan because there interest was in WEST Pakistan.
You forgot the part which said Russians intercepted them.
 
.
If that was what we wanted, we would have annexed east Pakistan in 1971. Instead we gave them their own country, and withdrew to India. It's not India that covetes other people's territory or states.

If you are talking about West Pakistan of 1971 then Indra Gandhi wanted to finish it, it was US who did not let that happened.

Well i am able to speak at least 15 languages and there are many personals on this forum which belong to spy agencies, some are x army and some civilians i must tell you that war is always fought when you have reason to fight Niazi knew that East Pakistan is gone and only fighting would led to killing of soldiers on both side for nothing and a clear defeat for him in last, and you said Indian Intel got US message do you think every body is fool even today India is incapable of Decrypting those orders which are given to IBG's 1971 is long gone, and simply just accept that If US was ready to attack India then they would not have stopped, 7th fleet would have destroyed all indian Navy in less then 12 hours,now a simple Ans US was never interested to save east Pakistan because there interest was in WEST Pakistan.

Bold part is 100% true.
 
.
Well i am able to speak at least 15 languages and there are many personals on this forum which belong to spy agencies, some are x army and some civilians i must tell you that war is always fought when you have reason to fight Niazi knew that East Pakistan is gone and only fighting would led to killing of soldiers on both side for nothing and a clear defeat for him in last, and you said Indian Intel got US message do you think every body is fool even today India is incapable of Decrypting those orders which are given to IBG's 1971 is long gone, and simply just accept that If US was ready to attack India then they would not have stopped, 7th fleet would have destroyed all indian Navy in less then 12 hours,now a simple Ans US was never interested to save east Pakistan because there interest was in WEST Pakistan.
If that were true then the US fleet would have been routed to the Arabian sea. Not Bay of Bengal. Secondly to decrypt messages one has to first have the message. Who do you think intercepted the message.
FAIL FAIL FAIL
 
.
no its not like that. sure in your POV we are bullying but believe me we really dont want others land. kashmir is more likely related to our ego, our extreme nationalism and it also has strategic importance for us. other than kashmir we really dont have any issue.
if we see from religious point of view hindu and muslims lived in peace for over thousand years. it was partition that affected communal harmony between hindu and muslims. if you see there was hardly any riots before british came to india. muslim rulers also maintained communal harmony. it is our colonial past and partition which is main reason for hatred between India and Pakistan.

What I don't understand what India will got from Kashmir which is majority Muslim state? if they gave it to Pakistan as big bro then it will nearly end all issues in Sub continent and start new era of prosperity as both will not need huge militaries to finance, even if India wanted to be a world power still it will have peaceful border with Pakistan which is quite long.
 
.
i am surprised that BANGLADESHI doesnt talk about that much how indian put their nose in this matter.. they look for issue to upset relationship between PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH ..
we lost East Pakistan and they lose us.. but reality never change that we are muslims and if india attack on Pakistan or Bangladesh they will fight back together..
what hindu have done before 1947 to muslims would you bother to share detail...
hide your stuff in your longi... or you will be ashamed what you have.
 
.
What I don't understand what India will got from Kashmir which is majority Muslim state? if they gave it to Pakistan as big bro then it will nearly end all issues in Sub continent and start new era of prosperity as both will not need huge militaries to finance, even if India wanted to be a world power still it will have peaceful border with Pakistan which is quite long.
On the other hand, why doesn't Pakistan give up Kashmir. That will also 'nearly end all issues in Sub-continent'.
As far as Muslim majority goes - that is irrelevant, India is a secular country (for real).
And even if the Kashmir issue is resolved, we still need a big military for your all-weather friend.
 
.
What I don't understand what India will got from Kashmir which is majority Muslim state? if they gave it to Pakistan as big bro then it will nearly end all issues in Sub continent and start new era of prosperity as both will not need huge militaries to finance, even if India wanted to be a world power still it will have peaceful border with Pakistan which is quite long.
Not happening bro!
Kashmir is of strategic importance to us, from the resources to the rivers and its position in Asia everything favors India. Giving away kashmir would put Indian capital near the border and also would be opening up punjab to more terrorism. It would then have dominoes effect on India.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom