What's new

Threat to destroy Indian N-plant stopped attack on Kahuta

PakSher

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
1,052
Reaction score
0
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan had warned India in the early 80s that an attack on nuclear assets in Kahuta would evoke a retaliatory strike on its Bhabha Atomic Research Centre in Trombay.This has been revealed by the then Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal M. Anwar Shamim, in his book “Cutting Edge PAF” launched here on Thursday.

Defence Minister Chaudhry Ahmad Mukhtar, former Chairman of Joint Chiefs of the Staff Committee Admiral (retd) Iftikhar Ahmad Sirohey, former Air Chief Air Marshal (retd) Tanvir Mahmood Ahmad, Lt-Gen (retd) Kamal Matinuddin and former foreign minister Gohar Ayub Khan attended the ceremony.

According to Air Chief Marshal (retd) Shamim, he was called by the then president Gen Zia Ul haq in 1979 to discuss air defence of the nuclear assets in Kahuta. Gen Zia had reliable information that India was planning to attack and destroy Kahuta.

He says he told the president that Kahuta was an indefensible site because it was at three minutes flying time from the border. The reaction time was about eight minutes and by the time the PAF aircraft would reach the area the enemy would have completed the job and would be safe in their territory.

Gen Zia asked how could the most vital deterrent in the country’s armoury be defended and the answer was to acquire most modern aircraft and advanced weapons and the PAF would destroy India’s advanced nuclear facility at Trombay, if they embarked upon this rash course of action.

“We will inflict more damage to them than they can do to us”.

He says he told the president that the multi-role F-16 aircraft with the latest weapons were the best and most suited to meet PAF’s needs.He says that in 1981 the US administration offered F-5Es to be later augmented by F-5Gs, but Pakistan refused to accept any aircraft other than F-16s. This was finally accepted by the United States.

Pakistan received the first batch of F-16 aircraft in January 1983, and he wrote a letter to the president about the task given to him.

“I am now in a position to confirm that Indians will not attack Kahuta because it is amply clear to them that we will retaliate and launch an attack on their atomic station in Trombay, and knowing that they will suffer much more devastation than us, will desist from taking any unwise action”.

He says he told the then secretary of science and technology, Munir Hussain, who was going abroad to attend an international conference on atomic energy, to inform his Indian counterpart of consequences of any adventure to attack the nuclear assets of Pakistan.

When he talked to his Indian counterpart, he said: “No brother, we know your capability and we will not undertake such a mission.”

He says that he also requested Lt-Gen Sahibzada Yaqub Khan, the foreign minister at that time, to declare at an appropriate time the intention of retaliating if any action was taken against the country’s nuclear assets.

“I think he did that while he was in New York. I also invited senior editors of newspapers to inform them of the capability that we had acquired and safeguarded our nuclear assets. They asked pertinent questions and I answered them. As expected the news was published in Indian newspapers next day”.:pakistan::sniper:
 
. .
Pakistan needs to always watch its back due to the continued Indian threat.
 
.
i don't understand why these high value targets are so close to border....
btw why did pres Zia rushed to India to plead for peace with the famous cricket diplomacy..if they're able to stop INDIA by retaliatory strikes ?
 
. .
Ya a prime example is 1965 when Pakistan attacked India when it was still recouping with the loss to China.

Good to know the feeling is mutual.
:cheers:

correct ur information it was india who try to invade lahore and sialkot but paf restricted them :pakistan:
 
.
correct ur information it was india who try to invade lahore and sialkot but paf restricted them :pakistan:

Heard of Operation Gibraltor.

Lets exploit the conditions in India and get our land.

Now whats wrong when we do that to you. we know you are in trouble. we were in trouble back then................. We learnt from you. :D
 
.
.
btw why did pres Zia rushed to India to plead for peace with the famous cricket diplomacy..if they're able to stop INDIA by retaliatory strikes ?

For a moment let us assume Pakistan can't stop India at that time, then why did India refrain from strikes. I hope the answer is pretty clear.
 
.
For a moment let us assume Pakistan can't stop India at that time, then why did India refrain from strikes. I hope the answer is pretty clear.

For the reason we knew that nukes are not going to be used in case of a war. Secondly we knew nukes were going to harm you more than to us on the economic front. I guess our assumptions were correct. :yahoo:
 
.
For a moment let us assume Pakistan can't stop India at that time, then why did India refrain from strikes. I hope the answer is pretty clear.

Because we dont believe in aggression..

We believe only in defending our land wen attacked or responding to provocations...not in pre-emptive aggression.


Hope the answer is pretty clear. :india flag:
 
.
For a moment let us assume Pakistan can't stop India at that time, then why did India refrain from strikes. I hope the answer is pretty clear.

The answer is very clear. India had the upper hand for example in 1971 when Pakistan was on the mat and if we was opportunistic, then lots of concessions could be extracted from Pakistan.

India is different to Pakistan and just because we did not strike does not mean we did not or do not have the capability to do so.

:cheers:
 
.
Because we dont believe in aggression..

We believe only in defending our land wen attacked or responding to provocations...not in pre-emptive aggression.


Hope the answer is pretty clear. :india flag:

defending country.lol.what about 71?
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom