K-Xeroid
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2011
- Messages
- 2,186
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Agree, that Iran would not go that far, it would be suicide for them. Luck? no, Iran chooses not to threaten because it would be destruction for them, threat here I mean by physical actions, not the barking type.
Also, everyone knows, that threatening the US military wise is never a good thing.
Yes, they rely on proxies. I mean what else can they do? bypass proxies and hit us officially and overtly?
Iranians cannot be underestimated , but in a realist world I would rate North korea as more threatening nation then Iran .
But still Iran is a better regional player when it comes on diplomatic and strategic grounds, They have maintained their respectable status in their region , even after U.S exit from Iraq it has become a second Iranian state in a same region . Basically , Iran is not just a country , its a ideology which could be far more dangerous rival then a ordinary totalitarian country . Even Israel don't knows that after striking on Iran , which proxy force or nation would retaliate for them . They are capable of using its third or fourth force , and at the same time , They are spending every moment to make theirselves more stronger and as longer as U.S's potential enemies kept increasing at that rate I'm wondering how longer your allies would like to stay with you. Don't you think that things are getting out of your approach ?