normalindiancitizen
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2009
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 0
Power is right????
All right, Arunachal is yours???? Lol.
Come and get it, I defy you.
You have the power dont you??
This Indian Land Is Chinese Land
- Thread starter SBD-3
- Start date
- Status
Power is right????
All right, Arunachal is yours???? Lol.
Come and get it, I defy you.
You have the power dont you??
Check your brain if it is damaged!!!!!
dont loose ur cool..ur head will need stiches..
back to the point.....if u dont have any furthur arguments left so its fine(as u dont really have...)...or just answer the question(s) asked in the initial post....
dont loose ur cool..ur head will need stiches..
back to the point.....if u dont have any furthur arguments left so its fine(as u dont really have...)...or just answer the question(s) asked in the initial post....
ok as there is no reply to my above post so it is accepted there is no proof for chinese claim on Tibet... thanks.. than please free those peeple... and also do see video below...
Last edited by a moderator:
Communist
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2008
- Messages
- 3,489
- Reaction score
- 0
hmmm. So whats your point?
Do you want to say this Indian land is Chinese land? Or what?
OK please let me know the history of Tibet. Hope you know how to write English. Make it brief please. Thanks.
Last edited by a moderator:
hmmm. So whats your point?
Do you want to say this Indian land is Chinese land? Or what?
OK please let me know the history of Tibet. Hope you know how to write English. Make it brief please. Thanks.
go through the post again...
Communist
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2008
- Messages
- 3,489
- Reaction score
- 0
Oh, I thought China belonged to Tibet.
OK if you say Tibet never belonged to China. Then where did Tibet belong?
Oh, I thought China belonged to Tibet.
OK if you say Tibet never belonged to China. Then where did Tibet belong?
u need to go through the whole thread again....
.. dont troll...use ur mind if u can put some pressure on it....if Tibet is not part of China than what could it be... a 1st grade student can answer that.... dont expect any furthur reply to ur trolling...if u have anything realted to topic post...
Communist
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2008
- Messages
- 3,489
- Reaction score
- 0
u need to go through the whole thread again....
OK but how is Tibet's belongingness relevant here.
u need to go through the whole thread again....
.. dont troll...use ur mind if u can put some pressure on it.... dont expect any furthur reply to ur trolling...if u have anything realted to topic post...OK but how is Tibet's belongingness relevant here.
u need to go through the whole thread again....
OK but how is Tibet's belongingness relevant here.
u need to go through the whole thread again....
Communist, dun bother to talk to him! He's hopeless
navtrek
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,169
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
For studies from English side, see : Full text of "Himalayan Battleground Sino Indian Rivalry In Ladakh"
For summaries from Chinese side, see Öйú´Óδ³ÐÈÏÀ*´ï¿ËÊôÓÚÓ¢ÊôÓ¡¶È_ÍøÒ×ÐÂÎÅÖÐÐÄ (China has never admitted that Dalakh is part of British India)
An interesting point from the Chinese study is that, Dogra's belligerent mentality, false desire to be a second-rank British-ish imperialist, and therefore its hawkish wars against Tibet caused the Sikh Dynasty to be substantially weakened. When the evil British saw the opportunity, it annexed the dynasty relentlessly.
Today’s India must learn the lesson from Dogra history, and make peace with its neighbors. If it is to repeat Dogra’s behavior, the same unfortunate fate will also repeat.
I’ll find time to discuss two treaties that follow the Dogra Tibet War in 1841-1842, between Dogra and Tibet.
BTW, your laughable analysis of Dogra-Dalakh-Tibet stops at 1834.And you recklessly assert that you have proven something.
And even funnier, in your next post, you incredibly and audaciously claimed that the whole 19 century is the Sikh rule of Dalakh, just very much like a British imperialist of 19 century.
Remind you again, there was only British India during that time, if you are not history illiterate.
To end all this interpretation of history which has gone to an extent of disproving the existence of India, Which is stupid by itself
Finally a pic which will prove that not even Tibetans claim Ladhak or Aksai-chin as a part of Tibet i.e.( China )
yellow indicated TAR(China)
purple indicates region of Tibet cultural influence
yellow & orange indicates Tibet claimed by Tibetans.
So there u have it now neither the Chinese nor the Tibetans claim Aksai-chin to be a part of China,
Which proves that it was occupied during 1962
People are open to disprove.Tibet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
guys, don't waste your time on this topic.
as long as our WS-2D guided rockets can flat new delhi from our border, as long as our CJ-10 missiles can hit their PM's office in a single shot, there is nothing to worry about india.
we should just focus on the current economic development and keep widening the gaps. do we need to worry about tibet? not really, we can capture new delhi and declare it as an indepdent nation, we can divide india into pieces, both are on the table.
as long as our WS-2D guided rockets can flat new delhi from our border, as long as our CJ-10 missiles can hit their PM's office in a single shot, there is nothing to worry about india.
we should just focus on the current economic development and keep widening the gaps. do we need to worry about tibet? not really, we can capture new delhi and declare it as an indepdent nation, we can divide india into pieces, both are on the table.
Wow this Crap has been going on for 15 Pages.....
Did anyone look at the title of the thread....the starter was stupid enough to say ...This is an Indian land....so if this is an Indian land (As claimed by the thread starter)....How can it be a Chinese land (again claimed by thread starter).....
How can one land that allready is Indian land.....become Chinese land.
Did anyone look at the title of the thread....the starter was stupid enough to say ...This is an Indian land....so if this is an Indian land (As claimed by the thread starter)....How can it be a Chinese land (again claimed by thread starter).....
How can one land that allready is Indian land.....become Chinese land.
To end all this interpretation of history which has gone to an extent of disproving the existence of India, Which is stupid by itself
Finally a pic which will prove that not even Tibetans claim Ladhak or Aksai-chin as a part of Tibet i.e.( China )
yellow indicated TAR(China)
purple indicates region of Tibet cultural influence
yellow & orange indicates Tibet claimed by Tibetans.
So there u have it now neither the Chinese nor the Tibetans claim Aksai-chin to be a part of China,
Which proves that it was occupied during 1962
Tibet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yes, Aksai Chin was occupied by China during 1962! This is a recognized disputed territory.
The map you had shown is not drawn by China or Tibet.
- Status
Similar threads
