MastanKhan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 21,269
- Reaction score
- 166
- Country
- Location
@MastanKhan Uncle sam offered Pakistan not the other way around
You are not living in 50s Bomber , bombers are cheap in which it can save sorties and can bring destruction in bigger time but if you compare older bombers birds with modern jet you will see the difference, Pakistan dont need a bomber Period . Why is that bcz they will be sitting ducks you wont deploy them against some militia who doesnt know anything about sams you are putting them against one of the biggest airforce and modern air force which has better combo of hi to low end sam system
Whats with twin jet Pakistan isnt getting twin jets no matter how much people b**** about pdf or some random guy says we need this and that
1st they wont have infrastructure 2nd it time consuming and waste of money and resources just because to boost ego of some random keyboard warriors
Paf soul reason is to protect its borders from incoming threats which f16 can perform very well there there is no aircraft in indian inventory which f16 cant beat
Even if Pakistan get these 8 birds block 50+you know much advantage will Pakistan get with this bird it will save time ,money, resources
You all keep blaming PAF for being a incompetent just answer one thing for no where paf raised a squadern of birds while india is been talking for years to add a new single bird
They are way better at there jobs than most of you keyboard warriors think
Hi,
Thank you for your indulgence-----I am not talking about bombers purely---but fighter bombers---deep strike aircraft and air superiority capabilities as well.