The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything

[asq]

Every man in this workd is born of women and when he grows up he marries one, so behind every successfull man there is a woman, but than who is behind every unsuccessful man, there is a woman,

 

[Thəorətic Muslim]

Nothing speaks volumes about gender equality than jerking a guy off cause he's hot, then castrating his balls.

 

[SMC]

forgive me, but let us look at the big picture... the entire argument of the "callous selfish female" vanishes if we look at the problem being because of capitalism, consumerism, wrong tradition.

the pressure on the male to earn money for the family etc exists because (a). money system exists, (b). even basic utilities in capitalist societies have to be paid for... then there is consumerism where companies project a cell phone as must-have and some fat-free milk brand as "essential"... why is a cell phone necessary at all ( forget the latest ) and why isn't the idea of fat-free foods denounced as stupid??

why blame the female solely when it is also the male who didn't rebel against the capitalist system... a almost-true-communist state like libyan jamahiriya provided basic necessities and even more-than-survival money to the citizen ( male and female )... in later years, consumerism came into the libyan jamahiriya and one of the reasons its citizens were shocked into not resisting immediately.

This has nothing to do with capitalism, communism or socialism, this comes down to female nature. Capitalist system hasn't existed since forever. Before it was physical labour that was extracted out of men by women. With capitalism, women just capitalized on a system that allowed them to transfer the wealth to them from men. They couldn't do this without capitalism - or to be more specific - the money system. Communism will not make a difference here. Remember, without the money system they used men for direct resources extracted out of their labour that may or may not be tradeable for other good and for protection. So they consider men their slaves in either scenario.

Women have massive egos largely due to the way they are raised and have men and boys treat them. Women are the most privileged class to have ever existed in history. Men are constantly told to respect women and never hit women even if a woman hits them first. They are told to compliment women and be nice and courteous to them. They are taught you must provide for a woman and protect her. Men will screw each other over just to get validation of women. I described this in greater detail in the following post: The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything. But are women taught anything remotely similar about men? Even remotely similar? Are they even told that they must EVER respect men? No, in fact quite the opposite. They are often told men are the enemy and to be vary of them. Is it therefore any surprise that women are so full of themselves when it comes gender relations? This is a social order FOR WOMEN BY WOMEN. This is what women teach their kids and this is how they grow up. This is female nature on display. Again, see the links here. Women could not care less for men. Most of them will be indifferent if all men were to disappear from the earth if they were able to reproduce independently and there was no need for male labour.

With the divorce laws in western countries, the slavery is a little more explicit and obvious. You work 10 hours a day and hand over 70% of what you make to a woman (who is legally able to work herself) after you get dragged through a divorce court.

Let's remember that despite all the hoopla women make up how important career is to them, most of them don't give anywhere near as much of an effort into their job as men. Don't take my word for it, ask the US Department of Labour in the feminist motherland of the USA.

They will claim they want equality, but in reality they only want selective equality. That is, equality only when it benefits women. They don't want women forcefully drafted for war like men are in the US. They do not try to equalize the disparity in suicides between men and women. They do not try to equalize the homeless rate, the workplace fatality ratio, the disparity on health care spending between the genders and definitely not the highly anti-male divorce and family courts. They will try to pass laws that will basically result in a man getting jailed and perhaps convicted based plainly on a word of a woman. The rape, domestic violence and child abuse laws are basically "guilty until proven innocent". India has something similar WRT to dowry laws. Again, these are people who say they are "fighting for equality". They want all the rights and privileges, but they want none of the responsibilities and accountability.

In western countries, female nature is on pure unadulterated display because society does not try to stop it. The rich women that don't need a man financially will always shack up with an "alpha male", that is a male that is an "alpha" in an evolutionary sense and would be a human alpha if humans were no more than animals living in animal kingdom. This IS female nature. So whenever they tell you they "just want a nice man", see them for who they are -- they are either lying or deluding themselves. While this alpha does not provide the resources that a "nice guy" might provide, he is a protector and is ready to beat the sh*t out of other men if necessary. This makes these women tingle big time. They love seeing men beat the sh*t out of each other. In South Asian and Middle Eastern culture, such behaviour is highly shunned upon. So the women will not dare do this.. though it's just a matter of time.

The following is a long video but goes a long way into explaining the female privileges and gynocentrisms of the world.. it has nothing to do with capitalism and communism, it all comes down to human and particularly female nature. Female privilege and gynocentrism is NATURAL - men are wired that way, and obviously women are as well.

and..

More and more men in western countries are starting to wake up to this and there's a big shift going on WRT gender relations.

have you looked at how stupidly today's "young" people ( 12 to 30 ) dress generally... t-shirts worn on the outside, t-shirts with garish logos, stupid haircuts, male one-fourth pants ( cut off below knee ), mini skirts on thin female legs, shorts worn by males as acceptable outside wear, canvas shoes, strange colors like orange, shirts untucked on one side, chains hanging off pants, garish loose jackets inspired by gangsta rappers, hugely loosely male clothes inspired by gangsta rappers, low cut jeans, jeans with balloon backsides but tight otherwise...

add to all that their rude, aggressive and arrogant behavior and language ( especially in indian males ).

yesterday, i was looking at youtube vids of "drunk girls", essentially ladies being stupid or falling off staircases/tables/balconies because of being drunk... i was laughing but also thinking why do they need to do that... when did drinking alcohol become so important... why do these drinking houses ( pubs ) need to exist... it was the english who brought tea into india, yet england ( and britain ) now seems flooded with pubs where people deem it acceptable to funnel down alcohol...

there has been a decades old "rise of the stupids" in many societies, especially especially those which was capitalist, traditional ( esp. south asia ), consumerist.

Not sure how this is relevant. Or perhaps my previous comment answers this.

The kinda women you're talking about dont even make 30% of the total population(females). And there're always exceptions in nature.
But you can NOT pull such sweeping statements just because you had a bad experience...most prolly thats the case.

The women are describe are the rule and not the exception. The females you describe are the exception. What I describe is female nature and how they've evolved. Some of this nature is on display in South Asian countries, but to get a pure unadulterated view one must look at western nations. There, the female nature is unabated and not shunned by the society.

well that guy thinks all the females think alike, which is not the case.
And any sane female would prefer a guy who treats her well rather choosing an arrogant and obnoxious mouthed guy with $$s. I decided not to bang my head against a wall so I quit drilling sense into him. Lol

Women "just want a nice guy" again? HAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOL. Very few men will be tricked by this non-sense anymore. We know this is complete non-sense. Is this delusion speaking or are you making this up? Listen, I treat most people really well, including women. I am just highly aware of female nature and never let them manipulate me using the vast array of manipulation tactics that they learn through their teen years. I force them to respect and treat me as an equal. If they ask me why I haven't shacked up with a woman and attempt to manipulate and shame me into doing it, they are promptly obliterated by logic and they never look at me the same way again. Perhaps it is the first time they find a guy that is able to see through their veil of "beauty and innocent" and see their manipulative and controlling nature.

he said he is soon to be married... he is fearful.
the keywords being "any sane female"... another word is maybe "non-fake".

Let me correct you right here. I will NOT get married and I will not be manipulated into it. It is especially females and female-worshipping white knights that pressure men into marriage. It will not happen. And yes, cue the usual internet female "no woman would want you anyway". As if female shaming tactics are not something I've heard a trillion times before. Why are they pressuring me into marriage if no woman would want me?

i don't understand what the college male or young jobnik can provide to the female, when most such males don't control their own destiny ( and that throws out smc's theory of scheming female wanting resources. ), unless that young male is ambitious or dreamy or ruthlessly dreamy/ambitious.

My friend, you're a simpleton. First, it is already proven that you also see men as females' resource slave by your comments. The argument you put forward has been discussed a million times before. And it is really as simple as follows. The passage of life I describe primarily is the age where both the male and the female will look to get married. But in their youth, women want an "alpha male". I describe this in an earlier post, however to re-iterate, these are males that would be "alpha" in animal kingdom if humans were nothing more than animals. These people are NOT human alphas, however since women are less evolved than men, they consider these men as alphas and these men make them tingly. In their youth, they will attempt to go after these men. These men will protect them, and the females hope that one day these men will provide for them like resource slaves.

Sooner or later the women will realize that these men have little value in modern world of knowledge and skills, and that we're not living in an animal kingdom after all. This is when they will start to go after the "nice man" that has a good job and that is ready to be their resource slave. Eventually they'll get tired of these men anyway and want to go back to the alphas.

This kind of behaviour is controlled somewhat in South Asian and Middle Eastern societies and is not extremely common. In western nations, where female nature is out for everyone to see, it's dime a dozen.

his face will burn reading that.

Seriously.. how old are you? Do you not think I've never heard this before from women? How they'll attack and shame a man into submission if they are losing the arguments? How they'll attack his manhood and whatnot, if he threatens to not be tricked by their manipulation?

 

[Levina]

blasphemy...

ehh... does such a color really exist or is it you in deliver-sarcasm-to-jamahir mode??

Lol
I wasnt being sarcastic nor do I've to lie about it.Lol.
My friends and hubby were fine with it while my mom was scandalised.
This time I will try a less shocking color, for sure.

The women are describe are the rule and not the exception. The females you describe are the exception. What I describe is female nature and how they've evolved. Some of this nature is on display in South Asian countries, but to get a pure unadulterated view one must look at western nations. There, the female nature is unabated and not shunned by the society.

Women "just want a nice guy" again? HAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOL. Very few men will be tricked by this non-sense anymore. We know this is complete non-sense. Is this delusion speaking or are you making this up? Listen, I treat most people really well, including women. I am just highly aware of female nature and never let them manipulate me using the vast array of manipulation tactics that they learn through their teen years. I force them to respect and treat me as an equal. If they ask me why I haven't shacked up with a woman and attempt to manipulate and shame me into doing it, they are promptly obliterated by logic and they never look at me the same way again. Perhaps it is the first time they find a guy that is able to see through their veil of "beauty and innocent" and see their manipulative and controlling nature.

I was wondering if I should even read your post, because I know you would 've recycled the same words and sentences.By now I'm certain that I'm banging my head against a wall.
Yes women 're manipulative, women choose their partner on the basis of the $$$s that he earns. Is that what you wanted to hear?
And is it wrong?
A man expects his wife to be pretty, to be a good housewife, one who never resists any of his demands and on and on... in short she has to be an all in one package. So if she expects him to be a good provider then is it a crime?
Big deal!!!
And dont bother to reply back to this post. I wont be reading it.

 

[SMC]

^^ If you're not interested in a reply they don't ask a question. Better yet, don't even reply to me. Or I am counting on too much logical thinking here?

Here's the key difference between men and women: women want men for the resources that they provide. If the resources were provided by the state and there was an alternative way to have kids, women couldn't care less about men. Whatever women do, they make it socially acceptable under the guise of "liberation" and "freedom" from men. But they shame men into conforming to female double standards and games if they do not approve of what men do. They are master manipulators. Regardless, men like women for who they are and will basically treat them with utmost respect and dignity. en are constantly told to respect women and never hit women even if a woman hits them first. They are told to compliment women and be nice and courteous to them. They are taught you must provide for a woman and protect her. Are women taught anything remotely similar about men? Not even close, quite the opposite - they are taught they must be vary of men and try to beat them everywhere they can. Is it such a surprise that women nowadays have an ego the size of jupiter?

 

[halupridol]

Lol
I wasnt being sarcastic nor do I've to lie about it.Lol.
My friends and hubby were fine with it while my mom was scandalised.
This time I will try a less shocking color, for sure.


I was wondering if I should even read your post, because I know you would 've recycled the same words and sentences.By now I'm certain that I'm banging my head against a wall.
Yes women 're manipulative, women choose their partner on the basis of the $$$s that he earns. Is that what you wanted to hear?
And is it wrong?
A man expects his wife to be pretty, to be a good housewife, one who never resists any of his demands and on and on... in short she has to be an all in one package. So if she expects him to be a good provider then is it a crime?
Big deal!!!
And dont bother to reply back to this post. I wont be reading it.

ofcourse not,,,its not a crime.
but,,gals 'just wanting a nice man who loves n respects thm',,,is,umm well,,a big fat lie.
in most cases it is not the primary critaria.
most working women (90%) marry someone who earns more or atleast same as thm,,,obviously there r exceptions.
for example,,,,u will find hundreds of male docs marrying female nurses,,but till now never met one female doc who married a male nurse.

 

[Levina]

ofcourse not,,,its not a crime.
but,,gals 'just wanting a nice man who loves n respects thm',,,is,umm well,,a big fat lie.
in most cases it is not the primary critaria.
most working women (90%) marry someone who earns more or atleast same as thm,,,obviously there r exceptions.
for example,,,,u will find hundreds of male docs marrying female nurses,,but till now never met one female doc who married a male nurse.

I knew it!!
Females 're smarter.
And seriously I dont see anything wrong in a gal wanting to marry a rich guy.

 

[halupridol]

I knew it!!
Females 're smarter.
And seriously I dont see anything wrong in a gal wanting to marry a rich guy.

yes,nothng wrong in tht...
but thn there goes 'just a nice man' argument.

 

[Levina]

yes,nothng wrong in tht...
but thn there goes 'just a nice man' argument.

Well thats what you men wanted me to accept.
So yes every gal wants a man who should be rich and stupid. accepted!!
I give in...you guys should celebrate now.

 

[jamahir]

Every man in this workd is born of women and when he grows up he marries one, so behind every successfull man there is a woman, but than who is behind every unsuccessful man, there is a woman,

why automatically blame the wife... many mothers in south asia are really responsible for their sons to have turned out unjust, regressive and stupid... if there is injustice and non-progress and war in south asia, it is because many mothers here didn't make their sons to walk on the road walked by real men like lenin, iqbal, bhagat, nasser, gaddafi, che guevara etc... so let us also blame that south asian tradition of "mother is holy whatever her wrongs" for the situation south asia is in.

^^ If you're not interested in a reply they don't ask a question. Better yet, don't even reply to me. Or I am counting on too much logical thinking here?

no need for such words, sir.

and i will reply to you after i have seen your vids.

Lol
I wasnt being sarcastic nor do I've to lie about it.Lol.
My friends and hubby were fine with it while my mom was scandalised.
This time I will try a less shocking color, for sure.

you are something... what is the reaction in kerala and the gelf?? and it would be funny if you land up in north korea with your dual color hair.

most working women (90%) marry someone who earns more or atleast same as thm,,,obviously there r exceptions.

aao thakur aao...

you too, like i asked smc, must look at the political system of the societies you describe... your perspective is of a obeying citizen of a capitalist society ( and all the troubles it gives to its citizens )... please do look at this my reply to smc.. ( The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything | Page 10 )... let us look at the big picture instead of getting stuck in details.

 

[Levina]

you are something... what is the reaction in kerala and the gelf?? and it would be funny if you land up in north korea with your dual color hair. .

Nooo.
why would that be funny? dual colors 're preffered most of the time, first color is a base and 2nd color is usually lighter shade of the first color , like this gal
http://www.short-haircut.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Blonde-hair-colour-ideas-2013.jpg
she has dual colors but it looks more natural. Lol.
I experiment a lot with my hair style...ended making many blunders too.

 

[jamahir]

Nooo.
why would that be funny? dual colors 're preffered most of the time, first color is a base and 2nd color is lighter shade of the first color usually, like this gal
http://www.short-haircut.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Blonde-hair-colour-ideas-2013.jpg
she has dual colors but it looks more natural. Lol.

she does, actually.

i get it now... i thought dual color is having sides or stripes of two colors... like left red, right blue... or braids of two colors... i didn't think it would be as simple as posted.

I experiment a lot with my hair style...ended making many blunders too.

i hope you are careful with the colors because hair is sensitive... i am quite worried about my hair, i have a classic 1940's hairstyle and don't want to lose it... makes me stand out, you see... gives me a distinct distinguished air... okay, enough of singing my praise.

 

[Levina]

she does, actually.

i get it now... i thought dual color is having sides or stripes of two colors... like left red, right blue... or braids of two colors... i didn't think it would be as simple as posted.



i hope you are careful with the colors because hair is sensitive... i am quite worried about my hair, i have a classic 1940's hairstyle and don't want to lose it... makes me stand out, you see... gives me a distinct distinguished air... okay, enough of singing my praise.

I'm all for experimenting...we 've one life and you can either experiment with your clothes or hairs..I try both. Lol
Go ahead and try a new style, trust me it boosts your confidence too.

 

[jamahir]

I'm all for experimenting...we 've one life and you can either experiment with your clothes or hairs..I try both. Lol
Go ahead and try a new style, trust me it boosts your confidence too.

ah, well... i will keep my classic style in clothing and hair.

believe me, it takes great confidence and self-assurance in wearing cravats in these times... below is johnny depp in the soon-coming film, mortdecai... he plays a british detective... though, in the first picture his cravat is not neatly sitting...

and of course, one of my heroes... carlos ( the jackal )...

 

[Levina]

ah, well... i will keep my classic style in clothing and hair.

believe me, it takes great confidence and self-assurance in wearing cravats in these times... below is johnny depp in the soon-coming film, mortdecai... he plays a british detective... though, in the first picture his cravat is not neatly sitting...

and of course, one of my heroes... carlos ( the jackal )...

View attachment 185234

Dont you get bored of repeating the same style??