What's new

The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything

I'd also like to say not all females think alike,If that was the case I wouldn't have made this thread in the first place.

This is definitely true if talking about most subjects, however my key point is that women have a group-think mentality in particular when it comes to gender relations, discussions and issues. I can definitely find many instances of women that will fight for men's rights and against misandry and anti-male double standards. However, as a percentage, such women would not make a large percentage of all women. The traits I discuss are innate to female nature WRT how they interact with men.

Let's take western countries where women have been "liberated" and have at least as many rights as men (and, as I argue, many more privileges that men don't). Women want "equality", but you'll rarely see them fighting for negative quality. That is, equality that doesn't benefit women. Examples of such include disparity in health care research spending, divorce and child custody courts, workplace fatalities, suicide rates, homeless rates and the plethora of social double standards. All these double standards, inequalities and disparities favour women and thus you will only see infrequent instances of women fighting these inequalities. This is why I say that women do not care about men. If women could replace the services provided by men, such as labour, reproduction and the logical male mind that allows a functioning society, women will gladly do so.

OTOH, men will fight for the rights of women and even grant them privileges over men (i.e. their own gender). They will even put other men down in order to make women happy. The typical "all men are pigs", "all men are assholes" and "all men want is sex" sexist bullshit is repeated not only by women but great number of men. This tells me that men care about women and how they feel. Indeed, as I mentioned in post #98, all of this male behaviour is natural. Men are programmed to be female doormats in order to get a chance to reproduce/have sex and to get female validation. And by no means all men will follow this paradigm, and in fact I think a small-scale evolution is happening where men are increasingly realizing the nature of women and not deciding to bother with them in a serious manner.

Right now misandry is so incredibly entrenched in all societies across the world that many don't even realize it, or feel the misandry is not really misandry and consider it "normal". But this is changing rather quickly with the internet. In Western nations particularly, MGTOW phenomena and MRA movement are becoming increasingly popular among men.

This question may sound racist but if you could accumulate and tabulate women of different ethnicities from good to bad or Bad to Good,How would you do it?

This is a difficult question, because one could look at it in several ways. For example, a lot of toxic behaviour seen in western females (particularly anglo countries) will not be seen in South Asian and Middle Eastern ones. However, I believe the reason for that is because the South Asian and Middle Eastern societies make such behaviour socially immoral and regulate such behaviour. If the same women were to be born and raised in a western culture, they will likely turn out to be no different than the white and black females that are incredibly toxic.

Is your question also about how brainwashed the females are about men, about "female oppression", how full of double standards and hypocrisy they are? Or how would they treat individual men? A lot of women have all those traits I mention but will still be really nice to men, albeit wanting them to slave to a woman. Others will be outright toxic, have extremely high expectations and an ego the size of jupiter.
 
.
I am talking about female nature, like I've said repeatedly. This concept applies to vast majority of females irrespective of colour, culture, etc.

you didn't actually answer clearly to this below point i made in post# 141... if anything, many younger ladies are not thinking clearly when they select boyfriend or husband... these ladies would be better off having sugar daddies...

"i don't see what young ladies see in young males, especially 99 percent of those males still in college... nowadays in india, there is a especially silly motorcycle with a sloping seat that goes very high at the back... i have seen college males swinging that unstable noisy bike through already chaotic traffic, with a female sitting on the so high backseat... they look silly to an onlooker... also, any sudden brake and the female will go flying and will become a statistic... i don't understand why she chose such a crude and reckless male... i don't understand what the college male or young jobnik can provide to the female, when most such males don't control their own destiny ( and that throws out smc's theory of scheming female wanting resources. :D ), unless that young male is ambitious or dreamy or ruthlessly dreamy/ambitious."

I oppose feminism because they demand additional rights

you are correct, really... and what do you think of the above??

and I'v also butted heads with Krista once on this issue.

why don't you invite her to pdf?? she will have another platform for her ideas... i support her mostly, only thing is i see idea as good from a socialist perspective.
 
.
Logical assumption as males tend to resolve issues with War , females have other offers on table
 
.
All she needs is a bit of spanking and things will get back to normal.
Advice: Get in touch with the nearest guy, for this Holy service.
 
.
you didn't actually answer clearly to this below point i made in post# 141... if anything, many younger ladies are not thinking clearly when they select boyfriend or husband... these ladies would be better off having sugar daddies...

"i don't see what young ladies see in young males, especially 99 percent of those males still in college... nowadays in india, there is a especially silly motorcycle with a sloping seat that goes very high at the back... i have seen college males swinging that unstable noisy bike through already chaotic traffic, with a female sitting on the so high backseat... they look silly to an onlooker... also, any sudden brake and the female will go flying and will become a statistic... i don't understand why she chose such a crude and reckless male... i don't understand what the college male or young jobnik can provide to the female, when most such males don't control their own destiny ( and that throws out smc's theory of scheming female wanting resources. :D ), unless that young male is ambitious or dreamy or ruthlessly dreamy/ambitious."

I already answered this in an earlier post right here:
The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything | Page 11

Particularly the paragraph that begins with "My friend, you're a simpleton".
 
.
I already answered this in an earlier post right here:
The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything | Page 11

Particularly the paragraph that begins with "My friend, you're a simpleton".

rather than insult me again with "simpleton" tag you could have wondered about your own words in that para where you implied that a college boy or jobnik is "alpha male".

really?? how??

that category of male doesn't generally make him own destiny.
 
.
^^ I will give you a more detailed explanation later today. Also check out my explanation of why I call these alpha males. It's not because they can't control their own destiny.
 
. .
rather than insult me again with "simpleton" tag you could have wondered about your own words in that para where you implied that a college boy or jobnik is "alpha male".

really?? how??

that category of male doesn't generally make him own destiny.

To re-iterate why I call these men "alpha males", I am copy pasting the following. These are males that would be "alpha" in an animal kingdom if humans were nothing more than animals. These people are NOT human alphas, they are evolutinary alphas. They are physically strong, have confidence and have a bit of a bad boy style. However since women are less evolved than men, they consider these men as alphas and these men make them tingly.

Now, women go after these men for multiple reasons. One reason is for "fun". This is common in western states where women go after these men because they make them very sexually turned on, although they know the relationship will not last. Their goal is to always land a resource slave once they are done going around town. Then there is a different group of women who are very sexually turned on by these men but want to have a long-term relationship with these men hoping they will get a decent job later on and become rich, particularly when it is time to have a family.

It is also worth noting that at this point in their life, what females want in men is different than what they want in men as they approach the age of 30 and they look to get married and have kids. They have a very naive view at this age. Their converges onto them as they approach the age of the 30.

So, this basically changes very little.
 
Last edited:
.
When I see two women with argument it ends , with a comment and then smirk

When two men argue , they end up fist fighting

Now balloon this up to national level and you see Male Harmones cause wars

Which is why it is predicted a time will come when men would be less then female (Either disease or perhaps sterilization or who knows women will imprison men) in future
 
.
In regards to violence between men and women, this area is perhaps one of the most gynocentric areas of human life in all cultures.

I discussed in one of the previous posts that in various domestic violence experiments, a female found to be violent against men is generally met with indifference and with often people smirking as if its something funny, or as if the guy deserves it (they assume the guy did something, and implicit endorse the female-on-male violence).

When this double standard is brought up to public, there are a plethora of gynocentric and misandric arguments brought up to defend this behaviour. I will go through the arguments that I have heard in this regard, especially from pus$y-whipped males.

1) The woman is weak so she cannot cause much damage.

A: Female-on-male domestic violence often involves the female using objects to hit the man, such as kitchen appliances and utensils, shoes and high heels, etc. This argument is overly simplistic and only applies in the animal world, it does not apply to humans because the females have a significant amount of objects available that they can use to cause significant physical damage. Another angle on this kicking a man in his testicles. Kicking a man in testicles is consider comical, never mind that the pain is so excruciating.

2) The man is able to defend himself - the fact that he is not means he wants to be hit.

A: This argument is wrong on so many levels.

First, as per issue #1, the man cannot defend himself in all cases.
Second, women complain about victim blaming. If this is not victim blaming then what is it?
Third, are we seriously teaching women that it is OK to be violent against men, and that the onus is on men to stop them from being violent or to shield themselves from the violence? This seems wrong on so many levels for obvious reasons. We never teach women to respect men, to treat them well, to be courteous to them, etc. Yet boys are taught all those things for dealing with men. This goes hand in hand with the general double standards of women not being taught responsibility and accountability for their actions the same way men are taught. The "he can defend himself" double standard seems to be just an extension of these more general double standards.

3) He must have done something wrong.

A: Would women like to be hit by men every time they do something wrong?

4) Women are naturally emotional, so let them do what they want

A: Men are naturally aggressive, so let's them do what they want. Yes? Something being natural is not an excuse for hurting someone else.


The fact that I even have to explain this to so many people tells me how deep the hole of misandry and gynocentrism goes. This issue of female-on-male violence is especially huge in South Asian and Middle Eastern countries where a man will be beaten to smithereens even if he is retaliating to a female. In western countries men are slowing realizing the social double standards and less and less will act like white knights, though significant portions still do.
 
.
People may laugh it off but its west we r talking abt. They don't have any moral standards to lean back to, thanks to their zealousness with materialism and consumerism. 50-60 years ago people in the west may have laughed off talks abt homosexuality becoming legal but now its a reality. Its very much possible for these zealots to make selective castration of "defected" males part of universal declaration of "women's rights" 50 years down the line. Its a morally and intellectually degraded society in a downward spiral. The idea of eugenics originated in the west after all and they sunk low enough to actually have experimented with such ideas.throughout the first half of the 20th century.
 
. .
People may laugh it off but its west we r talking abt. They don't have any moral standards to lean back to, thanks to their zealousness with materialism and consumerism. 50-60 years ago people in the west may have laughed off talks abt homosexuality becoming legal but now its a reality. Its very much possible for these zealots to make selective castration of "defected" males part of universal declaration of "women's rights" 50 years down the line. Its a morally and intellectually degraded society in a downward spiral. The idea of eugenics originated in the west after all and they sunk low enough to actually have experimented with such ideas.throughout the first half of the 20th century.

The attitude I talk about is more common among people of Middle Eastern and South Asian parts of the world than west..
 
.
@levina @Spring Onion Your comments please! :dirol:

i dont agree with SMC, he needs to check out Rural areas of Pakistan where women are into more physical labour work than he can even think of.
Secondly more than resources women want a strong man who can stand all kinds of situation not the sissy ones

@levina @Spring Onion Your comments please! :dirol:

i dont agree with SMC, he needs to check out Rural areas of Pakistan where women are into more physical labour work than he can even think of.
Secondly more than resources women want a strong man who can stand all kinds of situation not the sissy ones
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom