I only point to mullahs because they pretend to be pure and all that while they do the underlined :
Please note I don't interfere in gay men's lives unless you don't bother me, don't commit force or propaganda while being in influential position and don't go out in pride marches.
LOL
Like murtad proggies never did that
I can quote your
gulag and salt mine speech right here if you want
If you're talking about the TLP kind then yeah they are your polar opposite partners in crime
they do harm to Islam just like your murtad kind does
But if you're referring to respected scholars then yeah they are doing something for Islam and Muslims unlike you murtad pigs
Read again the entirety of my idea and you were the one I had replied to and apply your brain :
First of all why are you using a screenshot? Why not reference your post right here?
But anyway I'll link it instead
1. "Complete rejection" are Ghulam Ahmed Pervez's words, not mine. I only speak for putting those texts to the test of reason and rationality and only then decide what to keep and what to reject. As Pervez says these works were created beginning a 100 years after the death of the Last Prophet but from them we know of nice things like the utter respect he and his comrades had for that sublime creature the cat. Yet the ritualist Tableeghi Jamaatis in my neighborhood who claim to be only spreading the words of Hazrat Muhammad will do the contradictory thing of hurrying to the mosque while five feet from them a cat is screaming because he or she is being attacked by five dogs, dogs that the TJ fellows themselves allowed to breed and gather in their neighborhood, dogs that are supposed to be haraam. Now, would Hazrat Muhammad have respected and adored the subtle cat but would not have been subtle about human rights ? Would he have tolerated dogs being around his house where his cat Muezza lived and if that cat would have ventured out of the house would have been tortured to death by the dogs ? Will those dunderhead TJ fellows think of such things ?
[1] Like I asked you before, Why did you quote someone who you don't even agree with?
[2] Who the hell made you the authority on what to keep or what to reject?
[3] Who the hell is Pervez to question the authenticity of Sahih Bukhari?
This is the reality of
Ghulam Ahmed Pervez
“All that is stated in the Glorious Qur’an of Sadaqah (voluntary charity), inheritance, and other financial rulings are temporary, and are intended to gradually rise up to an independent role, namely [he calls it] the system of Rububiyyah (Lordship). Thus, when the time comes, these rulings will come to an end, since they are temporary and subordinate.”
“The Prophet (peace be upon him) and his Companions deduced from the Qur’an rulings that turned out to be Shari’ah. Likewise, all those who follow him are consultative members of a central government entitled to infer from the Qur’an rulings that, in turn, become the Shari’ah of their age, while they are not required to apply the preceding Shari’ah. Moreover, such a process is not limited to only one aspect of the Shari’ah, but it rather applies to the acts of worship, transactions, and morals. That is why the Qur’an did not specify the details of worship.”
“Allah (Exalted be He) says: Obey Allâh and obey the Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority.” [Al-nisa: 59] The meaning of obedience to Allah and His Messenger is obedience to the center of the Ummah (nation based on one creed), that is, the central government, while ‘those who are in authority’ refers to the assemblies held under its rule. Thus, the government alone assumes legislation. Besides, obedience to Allah does not mean obedience to His Book, the Qur’an, neither does obedience to the Messenger mean conformity with his Hadiths. For every central government instituted after the age of revelation enjoy the position of the Messenger, and, thus, obedience to Allah and His Messenger surely mean obedience to such a government. Even more, the Messenger was obeyed because of being the commander and leader of the central government, while what was obeyed was the central government itself.”
“The Glorious Qur’an states that the Prophet (peace be upon him) does not deserve to be obeyed, and that he does not have the right to impose obedience to him on Muslims. Besides, obedience to Allah (Exalted be He) and His Messenger (peace be upon him) means nothing but obedience to the center of the religious system, which implements the rulings of the Qur’an only.”
“Paradise and Fire do not refer to certain places, but they rather refer to the conditions of man.”
“Belief in Predestination, both the good and the evil thereof, is a Magian subterfuge made as a creed for Muslims.”
It is clear from these quotes of your beloved Ghulam Ahmed Pervez that he is a murtad atheist just like you don't quote this pig again in any argument anything he says is synonym of falsehood
[4] What the TJs in your neighborhood is none of my business I'm a Muslim and I follow Islam the way it is I don't follow the rest of the crowd to know what Islam is and how to follow it
But you're a murtad atheist so it makes sense you go with the crowd instead
[5] Already answered this here in
my post here
In case you forgot Allah forgave a vile woman just because of her once act of kindness towards a thirsty haram dog don't bark when you don't know what shit you utter from your filthy mouth
And who the hell told you I think Prophet Muhammad didn't care about human rights? He was the best humanitarian the world has ever witnessed
Prophet Muhammad even visited the sick woman who threw garbage on him every day
Don't dare question his character a vile filthy person like you should worry about his own
[6] Yes he would he was tolerant towards animals AND humans
[7] As I said in point 4 I literally do not care what your neighborhood TJs do they have no affect on me practicing/learning Islam
So all of it is "sahih" just because 10,000 mullahs and their supporters declare it so ? You won't apply your reasoning to it ? And if you cannot think of possibilities then you are a bot, a drone, not a thinking being. Stop using computers which operate on "what if this and what if that".
[1] A communist atheist talking about reasoning how ironic LOL
[2] What's there to reason? It is crystal clear what those hadiths mean what even is the problem?
[3] Possibilities? Like I said in point 2 it is crystal clear without any shadow of doubt there are no contradictions between Quran and Hadiths, But murtads like you with limited cognitive functions cannot understand that
[4] "What if this and What if that" LOL the irony of this statement I don't recall using this terminology instead it was you who always resorts to what ifs and what about ism and I have our previous posts to expose your bullshit (Even in this very post you resorted to this)
For example,
Hazrat Muhammad have respected and adored the subtle cat but would not have been subtle about human rights ? Would he have tolerated dogs being around his house where his cat Muezza lived and if that cat would have ventured out of the house would have been tortured to death by the dogs ?
Don't utter bs without looking at your post history first you clown
Only respond if you have anything new to say otherwise keep your trap shut and don't bother tagging me
but chose to not answer. I have answered dozens of such posts from Hindutvadis right from when my membership began in 2014. So you answer to today's exchange.
