What's new

"The real terrorist was me" : US Soldier (must watch it)

More US soldiers' atrocities against the Iraqis...

amer_atro_see-saw.jpg


amer_atro_gi-eat-child.jpg


amer_atro_child-tort2.jpg


amer_atro_child-tort1.jpg

Watch the true face, above pics are in rare category. See bellow the routine job in Iraq.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Watch the true face, above pics are in rare category. See bellow the routine job in Iraq.


Do you think you are posting something that hasn't been seen or completely dissected on this site before? On top of that you post a version that has been edited to leave out an RPG being found on one of the bodies. The news crew should never have put themselves in the position they did. If you hang with armed insurgents in an active war zone simply because of your journalistic competitiveness. You put yourself in extreme danger to be mistaken as an insurgent. I have seen reporters do similar things in Afghanistan. They embed themselves with Taliban trying to stand out among their peers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Do you think you are posting something that hasn't been seen or completely dissected on this site before? On top of that you post a version that has been edited to leave out an RPG being found on one of the bodies. The news crew should never have put themselves in the position they did. If you hang with armed insurgents in an active war zone simply because of your journalistic competitiveness. You put yourself in extreme danger to be mistaken as an insurgent. I have seen reporters do similar things in Afghanistan. They embed themselves with Taliban trying to stand out among their peers.

On the bodies? It can be clearly seen in the FLIR. The Reporters take their own chance because they wanted film of an attack upon Americans.
 
.
Do you think you are posting something that hasn't been seen or completely dissected on this site before? On top of that you post a version that has been edited to leave out an RPG being found on one of the bodies. The news crew should never have put themselves in the position they did. If you hang with armed insurgents in an active war zone simply because of your journalistic competitiveness. You put yourself in extreme danger to be mistaken as an insurgent. I have seen reporters do similar things in Afghanistan. They embed themselves with Taliban trying to stand out among their peers.

What Int. Law says, how to deal insurgents? The must be insurgents for US but after all they are freedom fighters to liberate their country from illegal occupation of US. Who gave the mandate to forces to declare them rebels, terrorists or whatsoever? If forces have to decide or kill people on the spot then what is the need of Civilian Iraqi govt or establishing judicial set up ? They were innocent civilians otherwise wikleaks was not going to release that video.
 
.
What Int. Law says, how to deal insurgents? The must be insurgents for US but after all they are freedom fighters to liberate their country from illegal occupation of US. Who gave the mandate to forces to declare them rebels, terrorists or whatsoever? If forces have to decide or kill people on the spot then what is the need of Civilian Iraqi govt or establishing judicial set up ? They were innocent civilians otherwise wikleaks was not going to release that video.

No, Wikileaks realizes thier target audience has little military experience and few powers of critical thinking.
 
.
What Int. Law says, how to deal insurgents? The must be insurgents for US but after all they are freedom fighters to liberate their country from illegal occupation of US. Who gave the mandate to forces to declare them rebels, terrorists or whatsoever? If forces have to decide or kill people on the spot then what is the need of Civilian Iraqi govt or establishing judicial set up ? They were innocent civilians otherwise wikleaks was not going to release that video.

The ones that consider the U.S. to be an occupation force are generally the ones that support the Afghan Taliban. Are you a Taliban supporter?
 
.
On the bodies? It can be clearly seen in the FLIR. The Reporters take their own chance because they wanted film of an attack upon Americans.

agreed, I was cutting a little slack since one of the sound men was carrying a sound boom.
 
.
The ones that consider the U.S. to be an occupation force are generally the ones that support the Afghan Taliban. Are you a Taliban supporter?

US itself was big Taliban supporter, has you forgot history? I don't see any difference in between Taliban, AL-Q and US whose aim is not to let people live in peace.
 
.
US itself was big Taliban supporter, has you forgot history? I don't see any difference in between Taliban, AL-Q and US whose aim is not to let people live in peace.

Good lord, how many times does it need to be pointed out that the Talibs came into being after the US left, and fought against those that the US had previously supported? It gets old.
 
.
Good lord, how many times does it need to be pointed out that the Talibs came into being after the US left, and fought against those that the US had previously supported? It gets old.

No they are the same extremist elements the US and Pakistan supported, alot of them changed their ideology and motives to become the Taliban, some mujahideen left over fought with the Taliban. but they eventually lost as the Us and it's allies turned a blind eye to Afghanistan and it's problems.

So don't try to avoid it.... it was you that funded the mujahideen, then it was you who neglected Afghanistan and let the Taliban rise.
 
.
Good lord, how many times does it need to be pointed out that the Talibs came into being after the US left, and fought against those that the US had previously supported? It gets old.
Funny how despite the facts that these can be independently verified by anyone technically adept enough to use a computer someone always never does check and has the gall to castigate others for 'history'...:rolleyes:
 
.
No they are the same extremist elements the US and Pakistan supported, alot of them changed their ideology and motives to become the Taliban, some mujahideen left over fought with the Taliban. but they eventually lost as the Us and it's allies turned a blind eye to Afghanistan and it's problems.

So don't try to avoid it.... it was you that funded the mujahideen, then it was you who neglected Afghanistan and let the Taliban rise.
Afghanistan was a muslim country. Why not the muslims fixed Afghanistan? After all, they supplied the manpower that made up the mujahedeen.
 
.
Afghanistan was a muslim country. Why not the muslims fixed Afghanistan? After all, they supplied the manpower that made up the mujahedeen.

let me get this straight? You would arm an army to fight your wars and then when you don't need them, you simply abandon them without a source of income. These people were uneducated and were armed to the teeth.

Afghanistan descended into civil war and no-one not even it's neighbours did anything about it.
Don't try to save yourselves by saying it was nothing to do with you.
 
.
Funny how despite the facts that these can be independently verified by anyone technically adept enough to use a computer someone always never does check and has the gall to castigate others for 'history'...:rolleyes:

Just wanted to say, you are right. But I don't even have to use wiki, I am old eneogh to remember, and I paid atention to the news as a youth (military family, and my own career)
 
.
Just wanted to say, you are right. But I don't even have to use wiki, I am old eneogh to remember, and I paid atention to the news as a youth (military family, and my own career)
you shouldn't be using wiki anyway. it can de edited by anyone.
you may have been around to see this happening, but you saw it from a different prospective, one that connived you that the US had nothing to do with it
 
.
Back
Top Bottom