I
n 1880 there were 400 thousands Arabs, today - 5 million.
there were an estimated 411,000 of whom 4% were jews, most of them holding foreign passports.
Thats not true. First of all most of the lands were bellong to state. Secondly large portions of land were and still belong to churches (for example Israeli parliament is built on land bought from church). Thirdly most of the Arab lands were belong to rich landlords from Beiruit, Damascus, Cairo.
Wrong again and let me tell you why:
According to the British Mandates Survey of Palestine prior to the 1947 partition plan: The Jews before 1920 owned an estimated 650,000 dunums (1000 sq. meters) fast forward just as of 1945, the land ownership of jews, (including what was purchased from arabs) had grown to 1,588,365 dunums (1000 sq. meters) which is exactly
6% no more no less! meaning arabs still owned 94% of Palestine and the myth about Arabs selling most of the land to jews, DEBUNKED. You do know that there was an enforced death penalty for anyone who sold Palestinian land to the arriving jewish colonialists.
Palestine was not a british state, it was a mandate handed down by the league of nations and does not entitle land ownership, only control.
Palestine was an A Mandate
The A Mandates (applied to parts of the old Ottoman Empire) were 'certain communities' that had
...reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognised subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory.
– Article 22, The Covenant of the League of Nations (1924)
This reflects reality as almost every single palestinian family including mine, still hold the ownership documents of the land, which israel of course doesn't want to accept or recognize.
240 times. Muslim population of UK also grew similary I guess. It did not happen at expence of local population.
349 point something rounded up to 350, check your numbers again.
And of course it ended up being at the expense of the local population. Why else were 80% of the Palestinian population forced into exile and still after 62 years not allowed back home? in my world this is ethnic cleansing.
Muslims constitute 3.86% of the total population in the UK, they never intended to come colonize and take over the UK, what a strange comparison.
Palestinians own lots of lands in Israel and areas A and B.
I am still talking about occupied land, not what a few own.
It was established on sand dune.
True, but it was still established in 1935 before Israels creation, meaning in Palestine. I don't mind Holon, it was one of the few places not established on top of Palestinian cities or villages.
Not less fair than other states. You can also ask 1.5 milion of Israeli Arabs. The overwhelming majority of them will tell you that they want to be citizens of Israel and not Palestine.
Way less fair, how many other states can "pride" itself by being created out of ethnic cleansing and lies? not many.
I know a lot of these people you talk about, of course they don't want to live in Fatah's (corrupt) mini state in Ramallah and the West Bank.
I don't ignore the good sides of the modern Israeli society and its achievements, but still this doesn't justify occupation.