<snip>.........<snip>
You have ran around every where but not able to answer why Pakistanis are singled out for terrorist activities every where even from the so called allies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
<snip>.........<snip>
Such things are not a laughing matter as it applies to not only Pakistani's but all south asians and other poor people from third world countries.
And as for you saying it is better to have an Indian passport for not being labelled a terrorist, it is wrong because all muslims are treated as such even from India and Shahrukh Khan's shameful treatment is an example.
I simply responded to your post.
This one:
I dont understand whats getting your panties in a bunch over seeing that article by Los Angeles Times.
You seriously trust that clown shahrukh khan man he will sell anything for coming in to news. And no having Indian passport has never put me in to any trouble. Please don't bring our religion in to it. The fact remains Pakistanis are singled out for terrorism related activities in other countries getting killed in there own country by foreigners with impunity.
You have ran around every where but not able to answer why Pakistanis are singled out for terrorist activities every where even from the so called allies
I don't think you are capable of understanding what I said, it has everything to do with religion and social standing in the current world. All muslims are singled out and even other people resembling them are singled out. The countries named for enchanced check up by US shows that. Yes Pakistani's are singles out because they are all considered to be muslims but what about hindu and christian or jews who are pakistani.
Also foreigners killed your people in your own country and you couldnt do a damn thing about it. Its one thing to have civilsed discussion, anoher to be completely moronic and act as a brainwashed individual.
Mr. abdul1,
You obviously posted the Pakistani Ambassador's lament with great relish and schadenfreude. And so, the predictable flame war ensued. It is very sad that Pakistanis must endure a lot of individual hardship because of the actions of a few extremists in their midst. You Indians could help out by demilitarizing your border with them and letting a UN run plebiscite on governance be held in Kashmir. Why not be constructive with your neighbor? Why do you take such pleasure in taunting them?
Regards,
TS
there king signed for accession with India hence it is Indian territory and why should we give unilateral concessions? It's there job to put there house in order not ours.
I thought India was for democracy. When it suits you, you say that the king sided with India against the Muslim majority and that makes it okay even though Kashmiris protest every day for autonomy and carry Pakistan flags.
During the partition the Muslim majority areas became Pakistan and Hindu majority became Hindustan. the Indians now want the Hindu majority areas and also the Muslim majority areas which had a Hindu ruler. If that was the case then the Mughal ruler was Muslim, why not give the autonomy of your entire state over to Pakistan?
And If Kashmir was a part of Hindustan, why then did your country attack Kashmir in 1948?
and another thing, Where is that letter from that Hindu ruler BTW? other Indian friends tell me that the letter of intent disappeared from the museum or something. I am sure another letter has been forged by now to fool the public. Please post it.
we don't see targeted bombings.
Mr. abdul1,
You obviously posted the Pakistani Ambassador's lament with great relish and schadenfreude. And so, the predictable flame war ensued. It is very sad that Pakistanis must endure a lot of individual hardship because of the actions of a few extremists in their midst. You Indians could help out by demilitarizing your border with them and letting a UN run plebiscite on governance be held in Kashmir. Why not be constructive with your neighbor? Why do you take such pleasure in taunting them?
Regards,
TS